Osama Bin Laden DEAD!

You should change your username to Damn, Spankme.

It's so easy.

Torture (ˈtɔːtʃə)
— vb 1. to cause extreme physical pain to, esp in order to extract information, break resistance, etc: to torture prisoners 2. to give mental anguish to 3. to twist into a grotesque form
— n 4. physical or mental anguish 5. the practice of torturing a person 6. a cause of mental agony or worry
[C16: from Late Latin tortūra a twisting, from torquēre to twist]
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/torture
 
You should change your name back to Retardber.

Definitions 2 and 6 also describes what happens to man students preparing for a particularly difficult test. Is test taking now considered torture as well? :)
 
¯¯¯̿̿¯̿̿’̿̿̿̿̿̿̿’̿̿’̿̿;810487 said:
You should change your username to Damn, Spankme.

It's so easy.

Torture (ˈtɔːtʃə)
— vb 1. to cause extreme physical pain to, esp in order to extract information, break resistance, etc: to torture prisoners 2. to give mental anguish to 3. to twist into a grotesque form
— n 4. physical or mental anguish 5. the practice of torturing a person 6. a cause of mental agony or worry
[C16: from Late Latin tortūra a twisting, from torquēre to twist]
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/torture
Click to expand...

I am not ashamed we caused mental anguish or worry for KSM, are you? Especially since that mental anguish and worry caused him to reveal information which led to the killing of Osama Bin Laden.... I think we can overlook being a little NON-PC in this case, don't you? I mean, every rule has an exception, doesn't it? Of course, if you wish to take the position with the American people, that it would have been better for us to have left him alone and not interrogated him as harshly, in spite of it meaning we wouldn't have killed OBL... well, that's your pinheaded business, but I think most people will disagree with your assessment.
 
And since you fucktarded pinheads brought up the whole "moral" issue of "torture" and stuff.... when can we objectively analyze the orchestrated assassination of an unarmed man after breaking into his home? Waterboarding a few terrorist thugs is "torture" but executing an unarmed man in the privacy of his own home... that's morally okay..... RIGHT???
 
Dixie said:
I am not ashamed we caused mental anguish or worry for KSM, are you? Especially since that mental anguish and worry caused him to reveal information which led to the killing of Osama Bin Laden.... I think we can overlook being a little NON-PC in this case, don't you? I mean, every rule has an exception, doesn't it? Of course, if you wish to take the position with the American people, that it would have been better for us to have left him alone and not interrogated him as harshly, in spite of it meaning we wouldn't have killed OBL... well, that's your pinheaded business, but I think most people will disagree with your assessment.
Click to expand...

I wouldn't expect a Confederate apologist who dabbles in revising US history to be ashamed of a little thing like torture.

Got any evidence that without torture "we" (including yourself?) wouldn't have killed OBL?

Post it.
 
Dixie said:
And since you fucktarded pinheads brought up the whole "moral" issue of "torture" and stuff.... when can we objectively analyze the orchestrated assassination of an unarmed man after breaking into his home? Waterboarding a few terrorist thugs is "torture" but executing an unarmed man in the privacy of his own home... that's morally okay..... RIGHT???
Click to expand...

So your solution to crime is waterboarding criminal suspects?
 
Damn Yankee said:
You should change your name back to Retardber.

Definitions 2 and 6 also describes what happens to man students preparing for a particularly difficult test. Is test taking now considered torture as well? :)
Click to expand...

I guess I have to bow to your obvious experience in being a "man student".

I'd rather not know what that entails, thanks.
 
¯¯¯̿̿¯̿̿’̿̿̿̿̿̿̿’̿̿’̿̿;810498 said:
I guess I have to bow to your obvious experience in being a "man student".

I'd rather not know what that entails, thanks.
Click to expand...

Looks like you got pwend again so you insinuate some kind of weird insult, proving that you got pwned. :)
 
Rightards, desperate to salvage something of a legacy for Bush - are twisting and spinning furiously to let their lust for torture take the credit for OBL's demise.

Unfortunately....

“…waterboarding and other abusive techniques failed to get the name out of Khalid Shaikh Mohammed and Abu Faraj al-Libbi. A New York Times account has both men claiming not to know even the courier’s nom de guerre, which actually may have counted as a kind of confirmation by omission in this case. That says something about the limits of brute force in interrogation.

It took more traditional sleuthing to get al-Kuwaiti’s real name, according to the Times. That meant putting more operatives on the ground in Afghanistan and Pakistan to track him, yielding a partial name. Once they had that, they unleashed “one of their greatest investigative tools“: the National Security Agency’s surveillance net. The NSA monitored email and phone traffic until they had his full name: Shaikh Abu Ahmed.

Last summer, the Associated Press reports, al-Kuwaiti/Ahmed made a fatal mistake: he called someone under NSA surveillance. After showing up on the grid, CIA operatives on the ground were able to hunt him. In July, CIA’s team of Pakistani informants tailed him, writing down his license plate number. That led them to the Abbottabad compound, which was off the communications grid to avoid precisely the mistake that al-Kuwaiti/Ahmed made. Even so, as my colleague David Axe explores in detail, lots of overhead surveillance tools helped U.S. intelligence isolate and understand the compound.

Everyone involved in the takedown of bin Laden can be proud of their contributions — especially the CIA, which has taken a ton of criticism for implementing the old torture program during the years after 9/11. And the torture question isn’t just an operational one, it’s a moral one: even had torture led directly to bin Laden, the morality of torture requires a separate moral judgment (as well as a legal one).

In this rather huge example, those questions appear less relevant. Waterboarding and other torture methods didn’t give the real name and location of the courier. Old fashioned human spying and electronic dragnets did that…”


http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2011/05/surveillance-not-waterboarding-led-to-bin-laden/
 
Damn Yankee said:
Looks like you got pwend again so you insinuate some kind of weird insult, proving that you got pwned. :)
Click to expand...


Torture (ˈtɔːtʃə)
— vb 1. to cause extreme physical pain to, esp in order to extract information, break resistance, etc: to torture prisoners 2. to give mental anguish to 3. to twist into a grotesque form
— n 4. physical or mental anguish 5. the practice of torturing a person 6. a cause of mental agony or worry
[C16: from Late Latin tortūra a twisting, from torquēre to twist]
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/torture

No mention of "man students"...in my post....it's all yours. Must be your penchant for self-pwnage.
 
¯¯¯̿̿¯̿̿’̿̿̿̿̿̿̿’̿̿’̿̿;810508 said:
No mention of "man students"...in my post....it's all yours. Must be your penchant for self-pwnage.
Click to expand...

¯¯¯̿̿¯̿̿’̿̿̿̿̿̿̿’̿̿’̿̿;810498 said:
I guess I have to bow to your obvious experience in being a "man student".
Click to expand...

Self pwnage? How ironic. :)
 
Dixie said:
And since you fucktarded pinheads brought up the whole "moral" issue of "torture" and stuff.... when can we objectively analyze the orchestrated assassination of an unarmed man after breaking into his home? Waterboarding a few terrorist thugs is "torture" but executing an unarmed man in the privacy of his own home... that's morally okay..... RIGHT???
Click to expand...

Painfully dumb analogy, and you're not the 1st to make it. We have every right to pursue the man who perpetrated the biggest attack on U.S. soil in decades. If the guys who take him sense a threat, they have every right to shoot.

But America doesn't torture. Period.
 
¯¯¯̿̿¯̿̿’̿̿̿̿̿̿̿’̿̿’̿̿;810496 said:
[redacted personal insults]

Got any evidence that without torture "we" (including yourself?) wouldn't have killed OBL?

Post it.
Click to expand...


Well, it can either be the enhanced interrogation techniques we know were used, or it was the ice cream and cookies... one of the two.... no other explanation exists. I believe it was the enhanced interrogation, you believe it was ice cream and cookies. We'll leave it at that.
 
Onceler said:
Painfully dumb analogy, and you're not the 1st to make it. We have every right to pursue the man who perpetrated the biggest attack on U.S. soil in decades. If the guys who take him sense a threat, they have every right to shoot.

But America doesn't torture. Period.
Click to expand...

No in your world America instead enters a sovereign nation without their permission to kill an unarmed terrorist in his home, but never ever pours water on his face. Your cognizant dissonance is still showing.
 
Onceler said:
Painfully dumb analogy, and you're not the 1st to make it. We have every right to pursue the man who perpetrated the biggest attack on U.S. soil in decades. If the guys who take him sense a threat, they have every right to shoot.

But America doesn't torture. Period.
Click to expand...


Oh, but are you saying "the ends justifies the means?"
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top