Cancel 2016.2
The Almighty
yes, they are all still separate nations Jarod. Some of them are a part of the same currency (Euro), some are not. We are witnessing firsthand how one currency with multiple political systems isn't working out too well.
One world currency
- Thread starter wiseones2cents
- Start date
yes, they are all still separate nations Jarod. Some of them are a part of the same currency (Euro), some are not. We are witnessing firsthand how one currency with multiple political systems isn't working out too well.
No, the change occurs very slowly, how long did it take to overturn Plessy v. Ferguson?
Its simply in its infantcy and is experiencing growing pains. Many of the United States once had different currency, and some different language. I agree the nationhood of the former European nations is up for debate and there are points on both sides to say if they are still seperate nations or not, but they are certantly moving closer and closer to a United States style Federalist nation. For example, much of what was Czechoslovakia (the Czeck Republic) now has almost no national government, they simply have local government and representatives in the EU.
SmarterthanYou
rebel
and every single one of these 'congomeration of nations', or as they used to be called....empires, failed for any number of reasons. including the EU. it's already starting to break up based upon it's fiscal policy.
SmarterthanYou
rebel
58 years, but you can't seriously be saying that plessy was decided based upon the constitution, can you?
The USA has not failed, and the EU has not failed, China has not failed. In fact many nations are finding it impossable to exist without joining such a conglomeration.
They claim it was, and at the time many belived it was... so yes, from there perspective it was, now the view of the Constitution has changed.
Cancel 2016.2
The Almighty
Lol... seriously? No Jarod, it is highlighting why one currency under multiple governments doesn't work. Ask the UK, Denmark and Sweden if they are happy they are not a part of the current Euro mess.
True, I am actually impressed that you knew this. That said, the above also shows that one nation with multiple currencies also does not work.
No Jarod, it is not up for debate. They are all still independent nations as recognized by the United Nations.
Um Jarod... they still have a national government and a President in the Czeck Republic. Each of their regions has local governments just as our states do.
SmarterthanYou
rebel
the usa is failing as we sit here. the EU is failing, note greece specifically, and all the other nations are seriously considering splitting because of it. you are deluded to think that this is the infancy stage of something great.
SmarterthanYou
rebel
thus the idiocy of a living constitution, the idea that it can be changed upon perspective. you do not see the lunacy from this?
If you base your view of "nations" on what the UN calls a nation, you are correct. If you use many other ways of defining nations.... It's not so clear. At what point did the world start considering the US a single nation?
Cancel 2016.2
The Almighty
Seriously... quit digging... the core is going to burn you.
SmarterthanYou
rebel
Cancel 2016.2
The Almighty
What exactly is there to 'argue' Jarod? Are you fucking serious? Do you honestly think anyone doesn't see them as independent nations? Tell us Jarod, what exactly are you basing your position on?
SmarterthanYou
rebel
how is thinking your ridiculous definitions of nations considered ad homs? i think you studied under the 'definition of 'is' school of law.
Cancel 2016.2
The Almighty
As for your other question... the US was first recognized as a country in 1777.
By who?
Cancel 2016.2
The Almighty
Morocco was the first.
Now... are you going to answer my question? What are you basing your position on? Who besides you doesn't think they are independent nations any more?