Noone has placed RUsh and Immanuel on the same level, the only point was that Palin was okay with what Rush said and not with Immanuel.
It illistrates her bias.
Has Obama or the admin made a statement on Palin's double standard? Futher, I have not heard anyone argue that Rahm's comments are okay because Rush said it. The point is, why is Palin defending him while condemning Rahm.
I agree, Rahm's position makes his statement different, but that is not how Palin rationalized it.
no it does not. are you saying that everytime palin or someone criticizes obama's chief of staff for something, that if ANY shock jock says the same thing they must issue press releases condemning every shock jock in the world?!?!
please show me where palin defended rush
She said it was just satire and agreed with him that the liberal activists were kooks.
It's also funny how she calls the activists kooks and in nearly the same breath condemns name calling.
Who would have been the subject of said parody?How do you know?
I know it wasn't a parody. Don't be fucking retarded.What was that comeback you just tossed at me in the discussion about Palin...oh yeah, you said I "couldn't know what she was thinking".
Right back at ya...you couldn't possibly know what Emmanuel was thinking.
so nigger is the same as calling someone stupid?
it was satire, that is not a defense, it is a reality
she explicitely said he didn't use it the same way rahm did....nice try
Huh?
It was not satire either.
http://www.merriam-webster.com/netdict/satire
Satire - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
He used it the exact same way Rahm did without the word "fing".
I dont know, it was a private conversation, it could have been anyone.
you equated kook with retard, that you can't figure it out, says alot
southernman said:Its hilarious they way you libtards try to attack conservatives with these lame arguments!
I did no such thing. I pointed out that she called them kooks then denounced name calling. No where did I compare much less equate kook and retard.
Do you realize that you contribute nothing to do the discussion.
He clearly said that the people Rahm was referring to were retards. If you can show us how that is satire, please do so.
Rahm's comment wasn't satire; it was what he actually thinks about liberal activists for daring to admit the true Liberal agenda....
He clearly said that the people Rahm was referring to were retards. If you can show us how that is satire, please do so.