Considering that the Democrats overwhelmingly condemned and demanded that they resign people like Eric Swalwell, Sheila Cherfilus-McCormick, Robert Menendez, and Al Franken...while the Republicans keep an 34 time convicted felon as president...you might want to reconsider that kind of nonsense, TA.
That Depends frankie.
Hilarious, Corn Pop is still jerking off about a misdemeanor at best that got magically elevated, for the first time ever, into 34 felonies. They ignored the statute of limitations, treated every single piece of paper, check, and ledger entry as its own separate felony, then a libtard judge gave the jury a multiple-choice 'pick whatever crime you feel like' instruction to get a conviction, following ignoring the law by those sworn to uphold it. The final result? For the first time in history, zero penalty. No jail, no fine, no probation, nothing. Just a big fat nothingburger. That one fact alone should tell any sane person older than 10 years old this was a phony trial and conviction. What will morons like Corn Pop do when it's overturned?
Another dumbass AI response. This idiot tells someone they're uniformed, (who knows who because apparently, he deleted the comment he was replying too) then proceeds to show us how 'well informed' he is by asking a dumbass question to his best friend bot and pasted it here as if it screams, 'see how informed I am' lol.
Once again, TA proves he didn't bother to actually read his sources. Minnesota is NOT asking anyone to turn over emails. A single Republican member is asking. There is no possible felony charge for refusing. All that is being done is requesting Congress compel her to turn over the alleged emails.Ilhan Omar looks like she's getting in deeper and deeper shit with alleged fraud. Minnesota subpoenaed her to turn over her congressional e-mails related to several Somali fraudsters who have now been convicted. She's known to have had more than a passing relation with them and the e-mails are public records. Yet, Omar won't fork them over.
Minnesota is now asking Congress to act for them and force the turnover of the records. If that happens and Omar refuses, she would be potentially looking at federal felony charges.
There must be some really bad shit in those e-mails for her to want to chance going to prison for not cooperating with a state and federal criminal investigation where she is known to have had regular relations with now convicted felons that were involved in the fraud.
Exclusive | Minnesota GOP state lawmaker pushes House Oversight panel to subpoena Rep. Ilhan Omar
The proposed subpoena requests communications from her ex-campaign staffer Guhaad Hashi Said, who pled guilty to defrauding taxpayers.nypost.com
Minnesota lawmakers fail at trying to get Omar to testify about alleged fraud, GOP leader talks next steps
Minnesota committee chair says more options exist after a subpoena vote targeting Rep. Ilhan Omar over the MEALS Act fraud scandal failed Tuesday.www.foxnews.com
Interestingly, in the Minnesota house, the committee issuing those subpoenas had Republican and Democrat support but the radical Leftist DFL, who is actually the party Omar is in, voted against it 100% (3 votes).
That isn't all correct.WHAT IS VERIFIED FACTUALLY
1. Minnesota lawmakers say Omar is refusing to turn over emails
Multiple sources confirm that Minnesota’s House Fraud Prevention and Oversight Committee requested Omar’s office communications with Feeding Our Future figures. Omar has not complied.
This part is true.
- Minnesota lawmakers say she is “withholding records” of her office’s correspondence with Aimee Bock, the convicted ringleader of the $250M fraud scheme.
- The committee chair confirmed they “reached out on multiple occasions” and Omar did not respond.
2. Minnesota asked Congress to issue a subpoena
Because the state committee cannot compel a federal official, they have asked Congress to step in.
This part is true.
- Minnesota’s oversight committee is asking Congress to issue a subpoena for Omar’s records.
3. Omar’s office appears in federal trial exhibits
Court documents from the Feeding Our Future fraud case show:
This is true — but the contents of the emails are sealed.
- Omar’s office was included in multiple email chains with Aimee Bock and her staff.
- These communications were entered as sealed exhibits in the federal trial.
- Staffers in Omar’s office corresponded with Bock about USDA food program access.
4. Is Omar “in deeper and deeper shit”?
This is speculation, not fact.
What is factual:
Bias check: Right‑leaning outlets (NY Post, Fox News) frame this as a scandal implying guilt. Neutral reporting (Minnesota House Session Daily, Washington Examiner’s factual portions) frames it as a transparency dispute, not evidence of criminal activity.
- She is under political pressure and legislative scrutiny.
- She has not been charged with any crime.
- Federal prosecutors have not accused her of wrongdoing in the fraud scheme.
- The sealed exhibits do not prove misconduct — they only show communication.
5. Could she face federal felony charges for refusing?
This is not supported by any reporting.
What is factual:
This claim is speculative.
- If Congress subpoenas her and she refuses, she could face contempt of Congress, which is a federal offense — but only if Congress actually issues the subpoena and only if she refuses.
- As of now, no subpoena has been issued.
- Therefore, no felony exposure currently exists.
WHAT IS NOT SUPPORTED BY EVIDENCE
There is no evidence she had a personal or improper relationship with the convicted individuals. The only verified fact is that her staff communicated with Feeding Our Future about USDA program access — which is routine constituent‑service behavior.
“She’s known to have had more than a passing relationship with Somali fraudsters.”
This is pure speculation. The emails are sealed because other defendants are still facing charges, not because of wrongdoing by Omar.
OVERALL FACT CHECK RATING
Claim Status Notes Omar refusing to turn over emails True Verified by multiple sources Minnesota asking Congress to subpoena True Verified Omar tied to convicted fraudsters Misleading Only staff communications shown; no evidence of wrongdoing Omar facing felony charges False / Speculative No subpoena, no charges “Really bad shit in the emails” Speculation No evidence; emails sealed for legal reasons
Why are you doubling down on an obvious lie?
One again, TA proves he either hasn't read or doesn't understand his sources.
You are ignoring the fact that for the first time in history the GOP was willing to elect a President convicted of 34 felonies.
Option 1 - It is crystal clear Terry is either incapable of comprehending what is in articles and he just makes mistakes. (DUMB)
Sorry moron, I've actually read every piece of 'evidence' in that trial. Have you? Anyone who does will see it was one of the most absurd trials in American history, right up there with the J6 Hollywood kangaroo court the libtards produced.
I get it. You would rather vote for a rapist with 34 felonies than a woman.
You gonna keep making that claim after you were so embarrassed last time you ghosted the thread? Here's a simple question for someone that read every part of the trial. What verdict did the jury return?
Trump is a convicted felon. It isn't just a label. It is an actual fact.
Thanks for showing us you didn't bother to actually look at the evidence like you claimed. Let's start with another simple question. What is the statute of limitations for a felony in NY? Your answer will prove you just lied.
I see you are completely ignorant of the appeals process. Trump's appeal of the Jan 2024 verdict in the E Jean Carroll suit is still ongoing over two years later. That is pretty standard for almost all appeals.
The appeals process is not being slow walked. It is the standard process to take years for appeals. But thanks for showing us how ignorant you are of the evidence and the law.
Tell us the NY statute of limitations for a felony. Then tell us when Trump committed the act and the date he was indicted. When you can tell us that it was outside the felony statute of limitations we can continue this conversation. Otherwise you can just whine and kick your heels against the ground like the toddler you are.
Perhaps you would not have found yourself in such distress if the democrat party has not put up an individual not smart enough to fog a mirror and a man who thought it was a good idea to install tampon dispensers in the boys' bathrooms.
I would say that most people that voted for Trump either didn't care, or outright believed the trial and conviction was a sham. I'm in the later category myself. I think Bragg and Merchan made a complete mockery of justice in that trial. Don't bother trying to convince me otherwise, it's a waste of time arguing it with me.
Gosh. Too bad you are in a cult and delusional.
I know you are in a cult. Maybe someday you will realize it and ask for help to escape it.
