Also, too, the countries depicted in red allow for life sentences (according to Wikipedia, whose sources I have not double checked:
![]()
in many euro countries a "life sentence" isn't actually a life sentence. so you might want to control for that.
Also, too, the countries depicted in red allow for life sentences (according to Wikipedia, whose sources I have not double checked:
![]()
still not "Acting in kind"
and therefore your anecdote is worthless to me as a persuasive argument.
still not "Acting in kind"
Executions are an eye for an eye mechanism.
in many euro countries a "life sentence" isn't actually a life sentence. so you might want to control for that.
For example?
If you execute an innocent person, the guilty person walks. It's binary. So there is no "executing an innocent person to ensure that a guilty person does not walk."
So they have life sentences then. Thanks.
I don't disagree but that's not a universally held view.
so my argument that "life sentences aren't really life sentences" then is backed up by what I just posted. Thanks.
It's not a view. It's a fact.
It's too bad we have the constitutional clause against cruel and unussual punishment. I could think of some great punishments for Capital Crimes.They're the equivalent of life sentences with the opportunity for parole.
They're the equivalent of life sentences with the opportunity for parole.
you can call it a life sentence, but in practice in most of those countries they only serve around 14-20 years. and in some cases less.
which is not the same.
My formal political view is that we should abolish the death penalty. From a purely practical perspective, it's a gigantic waste of money to manage capital punishment.
That said, the barbaric, inhuman acts perpetrated on victims by their scum always grates on my emotions, and I take pleasure when I hear that these animals have suffered for their crimes.