Of the President's son in law and son have nothing to hide,
- Thread starter archives
- Start date
They agreed because they are run by Republicans.
Getin the ring
Verified User
in America, my America, a private citizen needs to be charged with something before he can be made to testify publicly on anything, under the constitution.
What are the charges again? (((crickets)))
Jarod volunteered to testify in private.
really dude, are you paying attention, Google is wonderful tool in case you need help
Cancel 2018.2
Oh, hi
Why didn't you libs have any outrage over dems pleading the fifth yet have an issue with these guys actually giving testimony.
Hysterical and dishonest hacks.
Hysterical and dishonest hacks.
"a private citizen needs to be charged with something before he can be made to testify publicly on anything?"
Don't you remember Clinton publicly testifying under oath on live TV before both a Senate and House investigating Committee? And at the time, nor any time since then, was she charged with a crime
Kushner did good today. No "I don't recalls" or claiming executive privilege or excuses, etc.
You mean hid did not plead the "Clinton"?
Kushner did good today. No "I don't recalls" or claiming executive privilege or excuses, etc.
How do you know he did good, there is no public record of what was discussed today, only his per written narrative which was full of sloppy paperwork, unread emails and misunderstandings as the cause for his failure to report meetings, certainly sounds like excuses to me