Ode to the Climate Science-Denier

RStringfield said:
No, we (the Jews) are using our mind control to block you from the reality of how much others see you as a fool so you will continue to act the clown.
Click to expand...

Your feeble idiot rays have no effect on me. That's why the responsibility is mine to free the world from your TheoFascististic grasp.
 
AssHatZombie said:
Look fucknut, changing behavior through onerous taxation a mongoloid idea only idiots believe in.
Click to expand...

The mind control device probably stopped you from realizing that I don't support anything like that. I don't care if you do want to burn oil just to pollute the world. But you should pay for the external costs you create.

AssHatZombie said:
I already explained and you agreed how governments find a way to prop up revenue producing channels. Taxing oil will guarantee our permanent dependance on it, as the government and big oil thwart serious alternative development.
Click to expand...

Again, you are confused. I agreed it was something to be weary of.
 
RStringfield said:
The mind control device probably stopped you from realizing that I don't support anything like that. I don't care if you do want to burn oil just to pollute the world. But you should pay for the external costs you create.



Again, you are confused. I agreed it was something to be weary of.
Click to expand...

You do support it. YOu've just been gabbing about it for half the day.
 
AssHatZombie said:
You know why few challenge me stringfield? because they've verified all this on their own.
Click to expand...

Sorry, that's what we made you think. No, we don't challenge you because YOU ARE NOT A CHALLENGE. Same reason we don't look for a challenging game of basketball from a two year old. We might amuse you by playing, as we might the child, but it's not really a contest.
 
From the U.S. National Academy of Sciences. The nation's foremost and reputable scientific authority.

-Scientific Qualifications of U.S. National Academy of Sciences: Unimpeachable.


U.S. National Academy of Sciences: "It is settled fact that that much of this warming is very likely due to human activities."

May 2010


A strong, credible body of scientific evidence shows that climate change is occurring, is caused largely by human activities, and poses significant risks for a broad range of human and natural systems….

Some scientific conclusions or theories have been so thoroughly examined and tested, and supported by so many independent observations and results, that their likelihood of subsequently being found to be wrong is vanishingly small. Such conclusions and theories are then regarded as settled facts. This is the case for the conclusions that the Earth system is warming and that much of this warming is very likely due to human activities.

--US National Academy of Sciences

http://books.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id=12782&page=17#
Click to expand...
 
Cypress, why do you continue to DENY SCIENCE on this? I don't understand... seems like you think it's something to be ridiculed over, so I have to wonder why you continue to do it? All the scientific data that once supported the notion of man-made global warming, has been discredited, as it was fraudulently manipulated. The remaining data shows the Earth has a long history of both warming and cooling cycles, and life (in some form) somehow persisted through it all. As time goes by, more and more people are going to laugh at you for clinging to your silliness on this... they might even start calling you "Chicken Little" or something... I think it's time you re-evaluate your position and viewpoint on this, before you've done irreparable damage to your reputation... oh, wait, too late... nevermind!
 
Cypress said:
From the U.S. National Academy of Sciences. The nation's foremost and reputable scientific authority.

-Scientific Qualifications of U.S. National Academy of Sciences: Unimpeachable.
Click to expand...

OH the military industrial complex says it so it must be true. They never lie or manipulate.
 
Dixie said:
All the scientific data that once supported the notion of man-made global warming, has been discredited, as it was fraudulently manipulated.
Click to expand...

It has not.

Dixie said:
The remaining data shows the Earth has a long history of both warming and cooling cycles, and life (in some form) somehow persisted through it all.
Click to expand...

We have known that for a long time. The warming is significantly higher and it looks as though we are the cause. Life will persist through any level of GW. We may not (not that I think that is very likely).
 
RStringfield said:
It has not.
Click to expand...

Yes, it has.

We have known that for a long time. The warming is significantly higher and it looks as though we are the cause. Life will persist through any level of GW. We may not (not that I think that is very likely).
Click to expand...

The warming is no more "significantly higher" than the Medieval warming period, or way back even further, when the Earth was first created and life sprang forth on the planet. It 'looks like we are the cause' because enviro-wackos have spent millions of dollars on a propaganda campaign to make you believe that nonsense. Our actual emission of carbon into the atmosphere has declined since the 1940s, with passage of the Clean Air Act and EPA regulations, so if this were the 'cause' of global warming, we could expect to see it also declining.

And let's talk about this dangerous and threatening CO2 we are emitting... It is the building block of all life! Plants thrive on carbon dioxide! Botanists say that until recently, our plant life was actually in a state of STARVATION for carbon dioxide... they were not getting ENOUGH! Because, you see, the plant life evolved on Earth in a much richer environment of carbon dioxide. I guess they didn't have Liberals around back then to prevent global warming!
 
"All the scientific data that once supported the notion of man-made global warming, has been discredited, as it was fraudulently manipulated."

Perfect example of how "a little information can be a dangerous thing." Especially in Dixieland.
 
Onceler said:
"All the scientific data that once supported the notion of man-made global warming, has been discredited, as it was fraudulently manipulated."

Perfect example of how "a little information can be a dangerous thing." Especially in Dixieland.
Click to expand...

too funny how you float on by post 88...which is the same type of response, but its from your dem buddy...

:)
 
Dixie said:
All the scientific data that once supported the notion of man-made global warming, has been discredited, as it was fraudulently manipulated!
Click to expand...

like shooting fish in a barrel:

News Not Found on the Drudge Website:

Scientists at CRU completely exonerated by two independent investigations:

Report of the International Panel set up by the University of East Anglia to examine the research of the Climatic Research Unit.

”We saw no evidence of any deliberate scientific malpractice in any of the work of the Climatic Research Unit and had it been there we believe that it is likely that we would have detected it.”

http://www.uea.ac.uk/mac/comm/media/...sessment+Panel
Click to expand...


The British House of Commons Investigation of CRU

CRU Scientists Exonerated....

The focus on Professor Jones and CRU has been largely misplaced. On the accusations relating to Professor Jones’s refusal to share raw data and computer codes, we consider that his actions were in line with common practice in the climate science community.

In addition, insofar as we have been able to consider accusations of dishonesty—for example, Professor Jones’s alleged attempt to “hide the decline”—we consider that there is no case to answer. Within our limited inquiry and the evidence we took, the scientific reputation of Professor Jones and CRU remains intact. We have found no reason in this unfortunate episode to challenge the scientific consensus as expressed by Professor Beddington, that “global warming is happening [and] that it is induced by human activity”.

there is independent verification, through the use of other methodologies and other sources of data, of the results and conclusions of the Climate Research Unit at the University of East Anglia.

http://www.justplainpolitics.com/showthread.php?t=25214
Click to expand...

Dixie, Bravo, Meme, Yurt, Tinfoil, AsshatZombie: “Climate Science is a Fraud!”

...contrast to.....

U.S. National Academy of Sciences: "It is settled fact that that much of this warming is very likely due to human activities."

May 2010


A strong, credible body of scientific evidence shows that climate change is occurring, is caused largely by human activities, and poses significant risks for a broad range of human and natural systems….

Some scientific conclusions or theories have been so thoroughly examined and tested, and supported by so many independent observations and results, that their likelihood of subsequently being found to be wrong is vanishingly small. Such conclusions and theories are then regarded as settled facts. This is the case for the conclusions that the Earth system is warming and that much of this warming is very likely due to human activities.

--US National Academy of Sciences

http://books.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id=12782&page=17#
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
Dixie said:
Cypress, why do you continue to DENY SCIENCE on this? I don't understand... seems like you think it's something to be ridiculed over, so I have to wonder why you continue to do it? All the scientific data that once supported the notion of man-made global warming, has been discredited, as it was fraudulently manipulated. The remaining data shows the Earth has a long history of both warming and cooling cycles, and life (in some form) somehow persisted through it all. As time goes by, more and more people are going to laugh at you for clinging to your silliness on this... they might even start calling you "Chicken Little" or something... I think it's time you re-evaluate your position and viewpoint on this, before you've done irreparable damage to your reputation... oh, wait, too late... nevermind!
Click to expand...

Now you are being just as moronic as Cypress. It has NOT 'all been discredited' any more than it is 'end of debate, conclusive'

Cypress is bent on accepting whatever those who stand to benefit from the global fear mongering campaign.

Note though... Cypress continues to refuse to answer any of the questions posed. All he does is proclaim the national academy of sciences 'unimpeachable' .... which is pure nonsense.... and then proclaims that all evidence against the fear mongering flat earthers must come from a right wing blog.
 
Scientists at CRU completely exonerated by two independent investigations:

Report of the International Panel set up by the University of East Anglia to examine the research of the Climatic Research Unit.

”We saw no evidence of any deliberate scientific malpractice in any of the work of the Climatic Research Unit and had it been there we believe that it is likely that we would have detected it.”

http://www.uea.ac.uk/mac/comm/media/...sessment+Panel
Click to expand...

AGAIN... as stated every other time you post this nonsense... when you ask the fox to investigate the foxes activities in the hen house... it just MIGHT be a tad biased.

U.S. National Academy of Sciences: "It is settled fact that that much of this warming is very likely due to human activities."
Click to expand...

No it is not settled fact.

1) Jones admitted they did not keep all the data, so it cannot be reproduced. Thus, no one can test the data to see if it is accurate.

2) Jones admitted that there has been no significant warming over the past 15 years. A point you continue to duck.

3) Jones has everything to gain by continuing the fear mongering campaign, yet you proclaim him and the other fear mongers 'unimpeachable'.... which clearly shows that you are just a brain dead lemming willing to stand by the flat earth fear mongers regardless of anything that might contradict your precious THEORY.

4) Jones himself... one of your beloved masters... stated in the BBC interview that the matter is NOT settled. That there is still a lot we do not know.

5) The charts you linked to... show the areas with the greatest 'cooling' are the ones with the LEAST amount of stations and thus the most 'extrapolated data'

6) The link you provided also states that the stations in Africa and South America are largely unreliable. Yet again... extrapolated data is used there as well. (even though this is not done when trying to figure out if the southern hemisphere was warmer during the medieval period.)

7) Speaking of the medieval period... all known data suggests that period was warmer today. Though the fear mongers do state that because of lack of data in the southern hemisphere they cannot state if the globe as a whole was warmer. Funny how extrapolating data over large areas just isn't acceptable when it might show something they don't want to be seen.

But I know... you will continue to post crap from your masters, continue to ignore all the evidence that suggests this most certainly ISN'T conclusive nor is it FACT. Because you are a brain dead lemming doing the bidding of your masters.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top