Ode to the Climate Science-Denier

wanderingbear said:
This is an issue of science vs. religion. The back ward thinking religious fanatics want to denigh scientific proof so they can still believe in their primitive mythology with out looking like kooks.
Click to expand...

You are right... and you are wrong....

It is indeed religion vs science.

Science suggests the global warming fear mongers are wrong to be so absolute in their beliefs. But they are clinging to their 'faith' and refusing to admit any evidence that contradicts their faith so that they may continue believing as their masters have instructed them to.


Bottom line... the DATA ... even on the link Cypress provided shows that the globe has NOT WARMED beyond 1998 levels by any significant level.

and before the idiot fear mongers start chirping.... No, I am not saying it wasn't the warmest decade of the past 130 years... I am saying it did not get warmer than 1998.
 
It's as much of a mistake to say AGW is a lie as it is to say it's the gospel truth.

The plain fact is, no one knows how much man's activities contribute, and it's likely no one will.
 
wanderingbear said:
That may be what you think you are,but Im hearing nothing but right wing propaganda from you. You might rethink what party your affiliated with. The Conservatives would love you.
Click to expand...

They hate me, because i do not believe in outsourcing all our jobs for their short term profit. Nor do i agree with abandoning border enforcement to drive wages down, again, for their short term profit.
 
Onceler said:
It's as much of a mistake to say AGW is a lie as it is to say it's the gospel truth.

The plain fact is, no one knows how much man's activities contribute, and it's likely no one will.
Click to expand...

and in lieu of evidence, the scientific approach is NOT to make up lies for political reasons.
 
AssHatZombie said:
They hate me, because i do not believe in outsourcing all our jobs for their short term profit. Nor do i agree with abandoning border enforcement to drive wages down, again, for their short term profit.
Click to expand...

Then you are a conservative. We have nothing left to talk about. I hate all Conservative slime.
 
Onceler said:
It's as much of a mistake to say AGW is a lie as it is to say it's the gospel truth.

The plain fact is, no one knows how much man's activities contribute, and it's likely no one will.
Click to expand...
This.

Channeling Cypress and Wanderingbear:
So, the logical thing is to run around in panic and tell people their neighborhoods are infected with "hot" and ready to melt around their feet in a puddle if they don't start recycling their toilet paper. Eh?
/Cypringbearess

Channeling AHZ:
They do this so that they can create the necessary fear that allows them the foothold to make laws controlling the simplest of actions, the throwing away your trash, which they will expand into other more insidious areas of your life once they convince people that they deserve to have that control because they convince you that you are too stupid to want to drink clean water.
/AHZ

In this case I agree more with AHZ than with Cypringbearess.
 
Superfreak said:
Bottom line... the DATA ... even on the link Cypress provided shows that the globe has NOT WARMED beyond 1998 levels by any significant level.

and before the idiot fear mongers start chirping.... No, I am not saying it wasn't the warmest decade of the past 130 years... I am saying it did not get warmer than 1998.
Click to expand...

1998 was an el Nino year, meaning it was abnormally hot for reasons other than GW. Using it as a benchmark is as invalid as midcan and other liberals attempts to use the bottom of the Great Depression as a starting point when discussing what party is better for the economy. It is bad statistics (regression to the mean) to use an abnormal year as a means of determining long term trends. You should drop that from your argument bag, because it makes you look dishonest (not saying you are) or misinformed.
 
wanderingbear said:
That's because your an idiot kid who hasn't figured out what side is what. Or you a right winger who's just saying that to confuse the issue.
Click to expand...

No. It's you who has come to equate "liberalism" with anti-americanism only.

I am against the corporate agenda
me said:
because i do not believe in outsourcing all our jobs for their short term profit. Nor do i agree with abandoning border enforcement to drive wages down, again, for their short term profit.
Click to expand...

You are FOR the corporate agenda because it's being used to destroy the american people, a goal your brainwashed mind beleives to be noble.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top