Obstruction? Mueller probe wiped Strzok phone before giving it to investigators

[dukkha]

So, let me see if I got this straight, Mark Meadows, who is a Trump lackey head of the Oversight Committee, sent a letter to the Assistant AG complaining about media leaking in the FBI, and as his proof he cited one generalized phrase, that is phrase, from an Email supposedly proving the FBI leaked? Is that correct?

And that is your proof the FBI leaked information?

on April 10, 2017, in which Strzok tells Page that he wants to talk to her “about [a] media leak strategy with DOJ.”

The reason that this is significant is that on April 11, the very next day, The Washington Post broke the story that the FBI had obtained Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act warrants to electronically eavesdrop on former Trump campaign adviser Carter Page after convincing the FISA court that Page was “acting as an agent of a foreign power.”

The Washington Post article cited “law enforcement” officials as the source of its story. On April 12, the day after the story broke, Strzok sent Lisa Page another text message that, according to Meadows, congratulated her for a job “well done,” while referring to two derogatory articles about Carter Page......
..............

In June, the Justice Department’s inspector general, Michael Horowitz, released his report on the handling of the separate Hillary Clinton email investigation.
One of his findings was that FBI agents “widely ignored” the FBI’s policy against disclosure of confidential information about law enforcement investigations. The agents making these disclosures even “received benefits from reporters, including tickets to sporting events, golfing outings, drinks and meals, and admittance to nonpublic events.”
https://www.heritage.org/crime-and-...page-texts-shed-new-light-media-leak-strategy

 

[dukkha]

Dont waste your time, put me on ignore.

done

 

[dukkha]

Spot on, but it’s worth noting that Mullet didn’t intend to let the demotion—much less, the reasons for it, leak out.

How did we find out? I can't recall.....So many corrupt Deep Staters...so may dirty deeds

 

[archives]

on April 10, 2017, in which Strzok tells Page that he wants to talk to her “about [a] media leak strategy with DOJ.”

The reason that this is significant is that on April 11, the very next day, The Washington Post broke the story that the FBI had obtained Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act warrants to electronically eavesdrop on former Trump campaign adviser Carter Page after convincing the FISA court that Page was “acting as an agent of a foreign power.”

The Washington Post article cited “law enforcement” officials as the source of its story. On April 12, the day after the story broke, Strzok sent Lisa Page another text message that, according to Meadows, congratulated her for a job “well done,” while referring to two derogatory articles about Carter Page......
..............

In June, the Justice Department’s inspector general, Michael Horowitz, released his report on the handling of the separate Hillary Clinton email investigation.
One of his findings was that FBI agents “widely ignored” the FBI’s policy against disclosure of confidential information about law enforcement investigations. The agents making these disclosures even “received benefits from reporters, including tickets to sporting events, golfing outings, drinks and meals, and admittance to nonpublic events.”
https://www.heritage.org/crime-and-...page-texts-shed-new-light-media-leak-strategy

But none of that proves causation, you are connecting the dots based upon suspicion, if I said to you the Trump Tower meeting with Russians proved coordination with the Russians you'd reject it but that has just as much if not more circumstantial evidence than what you are suggesting above

 

[floridafan]

done

Bull shit, your handlers won't allow it.

 

[Darth Omar]

How did we find out? I can't recall.....So many corrupt Deep Staters...so may dirty deeds

Horowitz? It is hard to keep up with.

 

[Darth Omar]

But none of that proves causation, you are connecting the dots based upon suspicion, if I said to you the Trump Tower meeting with Russians proved coordination with the Russians you'd reject it but that has just as much if not more circumstantial evidence than what you are suggesting above

Why don’t you reject collusion lol?

It’s a house of cards built on innuendo if ever there was one.

 

[dukkha]

But none of that proves causation, you are connecting the dots based upon suspicion, if I said to you the Trump Tower meeting with Russians proved coordination with the Russians you'd reject it but that has just as much if not more circumstantial evidence than what you are suggesting above

WTF are you talking about? you are not making any sense .. this is what you said:

So, let me see if I got this straight, Mark Meadows, who is a Trump lackey head of the Oversight Committee, sent a letter to the Assistant AG complaining about media leaking in the FBI, and as his proof he cited one generalized phrase, that is phrase, from an Email supposedly proving the FBI leaked? Is that correct?

And that is your proof the FBI leaked information?

I just gave you proof,and I also quoted Horowitz

 

[dukkha]

Horowitz? It is hard to keep up with.

lol.. I should get a bunch of bulletin boards and put up the articles and draw lines like one of those crazed conspirators did back in the daze..

 

[dukkha]

Why don’t you reject collusion lol?

It’s a house of cards built on innuendo if ever there was one.

it's horse shit. it always was. it always will be.

Now we are talking paying off Stormy and CF "illegalities".
Which was the real purpose for Mueller - not collusion - just root around anywhere without probable causes
without limits...General Warrants crap

"Show me the man and I'll show you the crime"

 

[Micawber]

You have NOTHING. I personally guarantee it. Trump is going down hard and even YOU know what a stupid clown you look like now.