Obama's Swiss banks

Yurt said:
i guess it was too much to expect you to actually debate my points.
Click to expand...

Oh, of course...your "points."

All I read was that you hold Romney to one standard because you're voting for him, and Obama to another because you can't stand him.

I mean, you have to realize that. Remember your "Obama pissing on the dead" thread? You're basically incapable of objectivity. You'll apologize for Romney about 1,000 times before now & November...
 
then you didn't read my points. take my words and counter them. use my actual words, not what you claim i said. and do try to stay on topic and not lie about things.

thanks.
 
PostmodernProphet said:
duh......
Click to expand...

Not so fast...There are other reasons other than the Hollywood depiction of the evil rich guy hiding money from tax, or funneling money from ill gotten gain.

Swiss banks also have several advantages for the common man. Switzerland has one of the most advanced banking systems. Banks not only perform the normal banking functions but also provide services like portfolio management, securities trading and more. The economy is prosperous and banks are financially stable which makes them reliable and trustworthy. You can be assured that your funds will be safe in a Swiss bank.

http://window2india.com/cms/admin/article.jsp?aid=5930&query=" property "
Click to expand...

Another good article of this can be found here:

http://www.nationalreview.com/campa...everyone-ought-know-about-swiss-bank-accounts
 
Yurt said:
then he is not avoiding taxes according to your example. if they hide according to your example, that is illegal for in each case you listed, you must disclouse your assets under penalty of perjury.

so far, no one can show romney did anything wrong or illegal. the insinuations are simply partisan sniping with no foundation in reality.
Click to expand...

Something motivated him to have a Swiss bank account. As another poster noted it's not because of their convenient ATM locations.
 
apple0154 said:
Something motivated him to have a Swiss bank account. As another poster noted it's not because of their convenient ATM locations.
Click to expand...

Yeah, but according to Yurt, it's consistent for Romney, because he has always advocated paying the least amount of taxes possible. He'd have everyone find a way to avoid paying taxes if he could. He'd probabaly eliminate taxes completely.
 
Onceler said:
Yeah, but according to Yurt, it's consistent for Romney, because he has always advocated paying the least amount of taxes possible. He'd have everyone find a way to avoid paying taxes if he could. He'd probabaly eliminate taxes completely.
Click to expand...


Don't you find the lowest tax possible for yourself? Doesn't everyone?
 
apple0154 said:
Something motivated him to have a Swiss bank account. As another poster noted it's not because of their convenient ATM locations.
Click to expand...

your point? nothing he did was illegal. further, as was noted earlier, it could be for money earned outside the states. or, it simply could be interest rates, safe keeping of money or a numerous other things. you just automatically assume the worse because it is a republican.
 
Onceler said:
Yeah, but according to Yurt, it's consistent for Romney, because he has always advocated paying the least amount of taxes possible. He'd have everyone find a way to avoid paying taxes if he could. He'd probabaly eliminate taxes completely.
Click to expand...

oddly, romney never did that as governor and in fact has never advocated that. you're just a hack onceler.
 
Yurt said:
then you didn't read my points. take my words and counter them. use my actual words, not what you claim i said. and do try to stay on topic and not lie about things.

thanks.
Click to expand...

i am not surprised onceler is incapable of backing up his spurious claims.
 
Yurt said:
i am not surprised onceler is incapable of backing up his spurious claims.
Click to expand...

I have had no problem whatsoever showing you your hypocritical, hackish ways.

I do love your bogus contention that Romney has always advocated "paying the least amount of taxes possible," as though he would encourage all Americans to put money offshore and find as many loopholes as they can. Good stuff.
 
Yurt said:
your point? nothing he did was illegal. further, as was noted earlier, it could be for money earned outside the states. or, it simply could be interest rates, safe keeping of money or a numerous other things. you just automatically assume the worse because it is a republican.
Click to expand...


(1) We actually don't really know if Romney didn't do anything illegal because we do not have sufficient information regarding his investments and his tax returns to evaluate his claims of complying with the law. Given that Romney isn't giving any further details regarding his investments and isn't going to produce any more tax returns, and is thus unwilling to produce any evidence at all to substantiate his claims, I'm not giving him the benefit of the doubt here.

(2) Even assuming Romney didn't do anything illegal, that's setting the bar pretty damn low for a presidential candidate isn't it?
 
Onceler said:
I have had no problem whatsoever showing you your hypocritical, hackish ways.

I do love your bogus contention that Romney has always advocated "paying the least amount of taxes possible," as though he would encourage all Americans to put money offshore and find as many loopholes as they can. Good stuff.
Click to expand...

yes you do. you have yet to show how my support of romney's offshore legal accounts is hypocritical compared to nigel's hypocritical stance on obama paying the least amount of taxes necessary.

your last sentence makes zero sense and i never said that. obama used as many loopholes as he could, so did romney. you're only bitching because romney is a republican who has not advocated higher taxes....

there is no zero hypocrisy on my part. i would support obama doing the same as romney. in fact, i support obama taking the deductions and using the loopholes. what you fail to distinguish is that calling him out on hypocrisy and not leading, is not the same as supporting his underlying actions. it obviously is too much for you to grasp.

thanks for admitting you can't prove how i was hypocritical...using YOUR logic :)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top