Obama's Last Stand

It's spaghetti at the wall behavior. Whatever sticks desperation. Tie up Trumps attention. Some things have legal difficulties, others time constraints. Obamas behavior is petty and stupid. Be that as it may, it's an assholes last stand.

The count down clock to freedom is 25 days.
well said
 
I just want to get this straight: did Trump voters just say that OBAMA'S behavior is "petty and stupid"?

Put another way: DID FUCKING TRUMP VOTERS JUST SAY THAT OBAMA'S BEHAVIOR IS "PETTY AND STUPID"?

Beam me up, Scotty. Self-awareness is on permanent holiday.
 
first, you need 60 votes to override a veto......Obama is no longer the president.....second, there are more than 8 Democrats who will support it......

There are? Who would they be?

You need 60 votes to end a filibuster. There is no veto. It's already law.

According to that law, it doesn't matter who is President after that portion is enacted. There is no provision for the next President to nullify it. The notion is that it will take an act of Congress to rewrite the law. That's where the filibuster comes in.
 
You need 60 votes to end a filibuster. There is no veto. It's already law.

used to be true....Democrats changed that law....
On November 21, 2013, Senate Democrats used the "nuclear option" to require only a majority vote to end a filibuster of certain executive and judicial nominees, not including Supreme Court nominees, rather than the 3/5 of votes previously required.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_option
 
Hey, I get it. You're right, there's nothing like adding that Nazi tag to people who disagree with you on something. Well played. Israel is still wrong though.

We've been following the National Socialist German Workers Party playbook since capitalism was declared a failure during the Great Depression of the 1930's.
 
Last edited:
Hey, I get it. You're right, there's nothing like adding that Nazi tag to people who disagree with you on something. Well played. Israel is still wrong though.

If native Americans were launching terror style, missile attacks, against the rest of the U.S. from their sovereign Reservations, what would Hillary/Obama do?
 
Last edited:
That's 4, even if you get them on the off shore thing.

First, no one is going to give a crap about drilling in frozen seas with the new discovery of the world's second largest oil field in Texas. Drilling in the Artic won't be financially viable for decades, now.

Secondly, in 2018 there are 33 Senate seats up for grabs, of which only 8 are republican. Which, with the Trump wave, almost insures a 60 seat senate majority for the repubs in 2018.
 
"in 2018 there are 33 Senate seats up for grabs, of which only 8 are republican. Which, with the Trump wave, almost insures a 60 seat senate majority for the repubs in 2018." Bd #56
It may be true that at the favorable end of the spectrum that might seem like chocolate coated christmas on a stick.

The problem is it would then oblige the years long tenured "party of - N O - !!" to actually accomplish something.

But the Republicans have been obstructionists for so long it's not clear they actually know how.

Further: just what is it they WOULD accomplish, if they can?

- Restrict or ban abortion, under the wise and visionary leadership of the groper in chief?

- Increase U.S. military spending? FOR WHAT?!?!

Here's a hint.
Watch the C.P.I.
If President Trump makes good on his commitment to deport all illegal aliens (or what ever walk-back iteration you prefer), watch what happens to consumer prices in food commodities. Those price increases will surely outpace inflation if Trump does.

Luckily, Trump may be many things, but a man of his word? I wouldn't worry about that.
 
The "obstructionist" label is a silly liberal meme. The parties have always been defined by their opposing views.

My God, it is one of the stupidest meaningless memes ever invented by the Alinskyite socialist pigs. I will put it to good use over the next 16 years ... maybe longer.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top