G
Guns Guns Guns
Guest
"It's always the stated goal of the party not in power in the WH to make the other a one term President..."
No, it isn't, apparently.
No, it isn't, apparently.
"It's always the stated goal of the party not in power in the WH to make the other a one term President..."
No, it isn't, apparently.
"It's always the stated goal of the party not in power in the WH to make the other a one term President..."
No, it isn't, apparently.
Then show me when the opposing party didn't run a candidate against a President running for a second term.
Then you oppose efforts to hold government spending hostage to further cuts?
"It's always the stated goal of the party not in power in the WH to make the other a one term President..."
Not proven.
Show me one time that the opposing party did not try to win the office.
Trying to win the office and ""It's always the stated goal of the party not in power in the WH to make the other a one term President..." aren't the same thing, are they?
Thanks for playing, though.
Um... It is clearly stated simply by running a candidate. Are you deliberately retarded or does it come naturally? Show me one time that the party not in the WH has ever simply conceded the WH to them, that would be the only time that they have not clearly stated that they are trying to win the office...It's like your reality exists in some weird bubble of stupid that exists for no others.
he won't answer this because he knows it will show he is wrong.
You didn't make many. You tried instead to deflect.
Basically I explained for the simple among us. Obama is responsible for his policy, even if you don't want him to be, and especially because it was him and his party with super majorities that thrust them upon us.