Obama promises no refugees to enter US without passing 18-24 month screening process.

I understand that argument and agree that it presents a *personal* dilemma for the individual citizen. But our leaders are bound, first, by their responsibility to protect innocent Americans. IF, they can guarantee the safety of the citizens they are sworn to protect, then, they can accept the Syrian refugees/immigrants/terrorists.

Anything else is a deriliction of duty.

Here is the rub, and what you are failing to see. Our leaders can not guarantee that driving a car is safe... should they ban driving to protect us? Our leaders cannot guarantee that many many many multitudes of things are safe, should they outlaw them to protect us?

What about selling guns? Our leaders cannot guarantee that they are not being sold to the next crazy person who is going to shoot up another elementary school, should they ban all guns because they cannot guarantee our safety?

You Conservatives sure are allowing fear to run your lives.
 
The U.S. Department of Homeland Security and other federal agencies conduct extensive, enhanced screening of refugees, according to the State Department. The process can take 12 to 18 months.

Homeland Security agents review personal and background information and conduct in-depth, in-person interviews outside of the United States to ensure they meet necessary criteria. They must also undergo health screenings.

http://www.nola.com/politics/index.ssf/2015/11/post_599.html
 
Actually I was wrong, I believed a false report that 10,000 Syrians refugees arrived in New Orleans last weekend. Some have but nothing like that number and they were properly screened.

The fear mongering should stop.
 
I hear a lot of different statistics on the Syrian demographics. Let's stick to facts instead of partisan talking points. It's scary as f*ck people are claiming false shit just to defend their party's agenda. National security and making sure terrorists don't get in isn't a game to get your partisan mojo on. Let's put the safety of American people over politics, huh? I know it's a crazy idea but give it a shot. Your consciences will thank you.

The United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees — which refers refugees for resettlement in other countries — says there are more than 4 million registered Syrian refugees. Its figures on the demographic makeup of refugees is based on available data on the 2.1 million who were registered by the UNHCR in Egypt, Iraq, Jordan and Lebanon. (Another 1.9 million Syrian refugees were registered by the Government of Turkey, and more than 24,000 were registered in North Africa.)
UNHCR’s data show that 50.5 percent of refugees are women. Females age 18 to 59 make up 23.9 percent of the refugees, while males in that age group make up 21.8 percent.
Even younger males — age 12 to 17 — represent 6.5 percent of refugees, while females that age are 6.1 percent. The majority of refugees — 51.1 percent — are under age 17, including 38.5 percent who are younger than 12 years old. These numbers were as of Sept. 6.
We have seen a different set of UNHCR numbers cited on a few conservative websites — figures for refugees and migrants who have tried to enter Europe by crossing the Mediterranean Sea. There have been more than 400,000 such “sea arrivals” in 2015, and 51 percent are Syrian. The rest have come mainly from nine other countries. Most of these refugees and migrants have been men — 72 percent — but these are not figures on Syrian refugees or even solely the 200,000-some Syrians who have been willing to take some type of boat to reach Europe by sea.

http://www.factcheck.org/2015/09/stretching-facts-on-syrian-refugees/
 
Did Obama claim they were properly screened?

1) he said that no Syrian refugees would enter the country unless they were properly screened
2) Syrian refugees are entering the country
3) unless he has lied; therefore, the Syrian refugees entering the country have been properly screened....

so yes.....
 
Here is the rub, and what you are failing to see. Our leaders can not guarantee that driving a car is safe... should they ban driving to protect us? Our leaders cannot guarantee that many many many multitudes of things are safe, should they outlaw them to protect us?

What about selling guns? Our leaders cannot guarantee that they are not being sold to the next crazy person who is going to shoot up another elementary school, should they ban all guns because they cannot guarantee our safety?

You Conservatives sure are allowing fear to run your lives.

Conservatives are blessed with common sense. If ISIS isn't using the refugee crisis to their advantage they should be charged with terrorism malpractice.

In fact, the obvious question is how many terrorists are we willing to let in along with the refugees?

Where you are wrong is that gun ownership and driving a car are rights and privileges. Syrian refugee/immigrants/terrorists have no right to cross our borders---unless we choose to let them.

Apples and oranges.
 
Conservatives are blessed with common sense. If ISIS isn't using the refugee crisis to their advantage they should be charged with terrorism malpractice.

In fact, the obvious question is how many terrorists are we willing to let in along with the refugees?

Where you are wrong is that gun ownership and driving a car are rights and privileges. Syrian refugee/immigrants/terrorists have no right to cross our borders---unless we choose to let them.

Apples and oranges.

Its not a privilege to a refugee to be allowed to come in to the United States?
 
Back
Top