Obama messes up his daughter's age

i bet legion troll said something about a rightie there is no way he criticized obama, he probably talked about palin or bachman...but that isn't sad...right onceler



I bet Yurt said something about legion troll.


:palm:


 
sprinting away from that one huh

Not at all. I reject your whole notion that there has to be equal opportunity criticizing, at all times, on all threads. The main reason I reject that is because no one on the board does that - including yourself. If you practiced what you preached, it would be a different story. As it is, you don't walk the walk.

Beyond that, I have definitely posted defenses of both Palin & Bachmann when I feel that they're being attacked unjustly, but I certainly don't do it "on demand" or to suit your hackish expectation. My own personal politics is that I think people on both sides get a little hung up with minutiae; policy is much more important to me.
 
This is what I mean by persecution complex. 2-3 threads is "non stop."

2-3 threads on this particular issue... how many have been started in total calling Palin or Bachmann 'stoopid'????

You pretend these are the first of such threads. Hell, Dung got so worked up about calling her stoopid that he started two threads all by himself.
 
2-3 threads on this particular issue... how many have been started in total calling Palin or Bachmann 'stoopid'????

You pretend these are the first of such threads. Hell, Dung got so worked up about calling her stoopid that he started two threads all by himself.

Not "non-stop." As many threads as there are claiming Obama is a liar, or dumb, or Muslim, or not born here.

As for stupidity, I don't like some of the terms, but I wouldn't call Palin the sharpest knife in the drawer, exactly. Jury is still out on Bachmann....
 
2-3 threads on this particular issue... how many have been started in total calling Palin or Bachmann 'stoopid'????

You pretend these are the first of such threads. Hell, Dung got so worked up about calling her stoopid that he started two threads all by himself.


But I ain't called her stoopid in neither of 'em. It was funny.
 
Because Bachmann unintentionally invoking the spirit of a serial killer is funny. Obama getting his daughter's age incorrect doesn't really have a humorous angle to it.

And I didn't say Bachmann was stupid or anything of the sort. I said it was awesome.

except she did NO SUCH THING. The LEFT WING NUTS are the ones that are 'invoking' Gacy. It is a lame ass attempt to associate her with him. Or did she 'invoke' the spirit of every single person who has ever set foot in Waterloo as well?
 
Not at all. I reject your whole notion that there has to be equal opportunity criticizing, at all times, on all threads. The main reason I reject that is because no one on the board does that - including yourself. If you practiced what you preached, it would be a different story. As it is, you don't walk the walk.

Beyond that, I have definitely posted defenses of both Palin & Bachmann when I feel that they're being attacked unjustly, but I certainly don't do it "on demand" or to suit your hackish expectation. My own personal politics is that I think people on both sides get a little hung up with minutiae; policy is much more important to me.

if you're not sprinting away...how come you failed to answer the question?

cite where i said it has to be equal opportunity criticizing. if you say implied, then the same holds true for you for bashing the right for not criticizing the right.

why is a thread about obama's gaffe sad, when you fail to say dozens of threads about palin, bachman et al are not sad? <-- you won't answer that, don't worry, i won't wait.
 
chappelles-show-season-two-uncensored-20050527042236941-000.jpg

why are you posting your pic in this thread? is it germane?
 
if you're not sprinting away...how come you failed to answer the question?

cite where i said it has to be equal opportunity criticizing. if you say implied, then the same holds true for you for bashing the right for not criticizing the right.

why is a thread about obama's gaffe sad, when you fail to say dozens of threads about palin, bachman et al are not sad? <-- you won't answer that, don't worry, i won't wait.

Some are, some aren't. As usual, you want a cookie-cutter for every thread & situation; sorry, but it doesn't exist.

Your entire schtick on the board is equal-opportunity criticizing, even though you don't practice it or hold rightie posters to that standard. It's generally some variation of "where is the left now?" or "can you imagine if this were Bush?", or something like that. It's an obsession, but like I said, you don't walk the walk.
 
Some are, some aren't. As usual, you want a cookie-cutter for every thread & situation; sorry, but it doesn't exist.

Your entire schtick on the board is equal-opportunity criticizing, even though you don't practice it or hold rightie posters to that standard. It's generally some variation of "where is the left now?" or "can you imagine if this were Bush?", or something like that. It's an obsession, but like I said, you don't walk the walk.

cite one post where i said it must be equal.

and truly hilarious that in the same post, you prove me right by criticizing me for not being equal opportunity. wow, just wow.
 
cite one post where i said it must be equal.

and truly hilarious that in the same post, you prove me right by criticizing me for not being equal opportunity. wow, just wow.

I pointed that out for the irony. Your posts are generally rich with irony.

And are you serious about citing a post? Are you really not aware that this is what you do, all of the time?

That's actually disturbing...
 
I pointed that out for the irony. Your posts are generally rich with irony.

And are you serious about citing a post? Are you really not aware that this is what you do, all of the time?

That's actually disturbing...

no post. thus you're proven liar by your own standards.

thanks
 
Okey, dokey - how about the OP? Ya might want to go back & check it out.

Like I said - disturbing...

what about the OP? now, let us see what happens when onceler asks for a link and doesn't get it:

Show me a major candidate who used violent imagery w/ Bush.

Or you lied.

show me a single post where i demand or ask for equal opportunity -- or you lied.

see how that works...
 
what about the OP? now, let us see what happens when onceler asks for a link and doesn't get it:



show me a single post where i demand or ask for equal opportunity -- or you lied.

see how that works...

:lol:

Yurt can't read!!!

Tell me, Yurtsie - what's the difference between a major candidate & a link?

Too funny.....
 
:lol:

Yurt can't read!!!

Tell me, Yurtsie - what's the difference between a major candidate & a link?

Too funny.....

seriously lame and seriously dishonest...you were asking for a LINK, because how else can i "show" you a major candidate without giving you a link. i really can't believe you tried to pass off that whopper of a lie. talk about splitting hairs, not to mention downright dishonest.

show me my words, or else you lied. no link, just my words.

happy now?
 
Hilarious - you probably looked awhile for that, too.

I'll answer for you: there are lots of differences between a major candidate, who is actually a person, and a link...
 
Hilarious - you probably looked awhile for that, too.

I'll answer for you: there are lots of differences between a major candidate, who is actually a person, and a link...

i didn't ask for a link the second time...why the lies? and why are you sprinting away from answering HOW i would "show" you a major candidate without giving you a link?

it took 60 seconds onceler. far less time than you spend obsessing over the other thread.

now, show my words, i don't need a link, or you're a liar. and a hypocrite.
 
Don't you think it's at least a little bit funny that you keep showing how much you are unable to read?

I already told you; the OP. It isn't hard to go back & read. That's the most immediate example. If you want more, check most other threads that you have started, ever...
 
Back
Top