Obama Is A Muslim

No they didn't.

Hysterical denials and bad logic are your usual m.o. , not descriptive of anything I've done.
This whole thread is full of them posts from you with both in it.

I pointed out that the writings of the religion recognize three meanings for the word BEFORE the one that you suggested was the ONLY meaning. Then you deny it hysterically and use bad logic to defend it.

It is indicative of every post you present. First by attempting a sad ad hominem, then by ignoring the factual meanings presented other than your suggested "only" meaning.
 
This whole thread is full of them.

I pointed out that the writings of the religion recognize three meanings for the word BEFORE the one that you suggested was the ONLY meaning. Then you deny it hysterically and use bad logic to defend it.

It is indicative of every post you present.

None of them have removed the violent connotation.

Every post I present? Clearly that's over the top.:rolleyes:
 
None of them have removed the violent connotation.

Every post I present? Clearly that's over the top.:rolleyes:
When you have lost the argument you resort to fallacy every time. It starts with an ad hominem attack on "freemasons" as if they have anything to do with your embarrassing ignorance of the religion you attempt to teach others of in this thread, but it pretty much permeates every thread of yours.
 
When you have lost the argument you resort to fallacy every time. It starts with an ad hominem attack on "freemasons" as if they have anything to do with your embarrassing ignorance of the religion you attempt to teach others of in this thread, but it pretty much permeates every thread of yours.

I haven't lost. So there's no way of knowing what I would do.

Which branch of islam has no terrorists?
 
Which one doesn't teach it as warfare?
Again, fallacious argument. You presented it as the only meaning for the word. You have been proven wrong and then attempt to change the meaning of your premise.

You are a sad little man who desperately denies ignorance and uses silly fallacies to attempt to defend ignorance and fear.

All forms of Islam teach three meanings of Jihad before the meaning you tried to say was the ONLY meaning of the word. It gets more embarrassing each time you pretend that your very apparent ignorance isn't clear to every poster on this board at this moment and your desperate wish to pretend to knowledge at this point just increases this image to every person here.
 
Again, fallacious argument.
It's not an argument, it's a question.
You presented it as the only meaning for the word. You have been proven wrong and then attempt to change the meaning of your premise.

You are a sad little man who desperately denies ignorance and uses silly fallacies to attempt to defend ignorance and fear.

All forms of Islam teach three meanings of Jihad before the meaning you tried to say was the ONLY meaning of the word. It gets more embarrassing each time you pretend that your very apparent ignorance isn't clear to every poster on this board at this moment and your desperate wish to pretend to knowledge at this point just increases this image to every person here.

Yet for some reason, all branches of islam have terrorists. They must all be misunderstanding. :rolleyes:

damo = defeated

I rock.
 
It's not an argument, it's a question.


Yet for some reason, all branches of islam have terrorists. They must all be misunderstanding. :rolleyes:

damo = defeated

I rock.
Fallacy again. Nobody suggested that some small number of Muslims of every sect practice the fourth version of jihad. It was, however, only you that suggested that no other forms are ever taught and asked "which sect teaches" anything otherwise. When presented with actual knowledge, that every sect recognizes three meanings ABOVE your one meaning you hightail it back to "but there are terrorists and you are a freemason!"

We know that, it was our point that the entire religion is not made up of terrorism. So far you have only proved you are unknowledgeable and unwilling to learn anything.
 
Fallacy again. Nobody suggested that some small number of Muslims of every sect practice the fourth version of jihad. It was, however, only you that suggested that no other forms are ever taught. When presented with actual knowledge you hightail it back to "but there are terrorists"!

We know that, it was our point that the entire religion is not made up of terrorism. So far you have only proved you are acknowledgeable and unwilling to learn anything.


jarod seems to believe that violent jihad is not part of all branches of islam, but it is, as you have agreed. It may have other meanings, personal struggle etc, but no sects deny the violent side, and who's to say that "personal struggle" stops where violence begins?

you can play your little smoke and mirrors game, and assist your NWO masters in perpetuating the "moderate Islam" myth, but I'll also be here setting the record straight. Everytime.

Don't applaud. Just throw money.
 
jarod seems to believe that violent jihad is not part of all branches of islam, but it is, as you have agreed. It may have other meanings, personal struggle etc, but no sects deny the violent side, and who's to say that "personal struggle" stops where violence begins?

you can play your little smoke and mirrors game, and assist your NWO masters in perpetuating the "moderate Islam" myth, but I'll also be here setting the record straight. Everytime.

Don't applaud. Just throw money.
The record shows that of the billions of Muslims, only a thimbleful are those that make you fear all of them. The record also shows that when you asked what sect taught differently and suddenly found out that ALL of them did you were unable to admit your total ignorance and resorted to pretense and fallacy.

I'll be here to point that out every time.

Game. Set. Match.
 
The record shows that of the billions of Muslims, only a thimbleful are those that make you fear all of them.

I'll be here to point that out every time.

Game. Set. Match.

And few of them stand up the "extremist" element in their society. Maybe they agree with them?

The myth of moderate islam still remains a real limp dicked lover.
 
And few of them stand up the "extremist" element in their society. Maybe they agree with them?

The myth of moderate islam still remains a real limp dicked lover.
Maybe they fear them rather than agree with them.

The myth that every muslim is a violent jihadist bent on the destruction of all who are not muslim still remains solely in your fear, rather than in reality.

I'll state it again:

The record also shows that when you asked what sect taught differently and suddenly found out that ALL of them did you were unable to admit your total ignorance and resorted to pretense and fallacy. (Again here with another sad attempt at ad hominem).

I'll be here to point that out every time.

Game. Set. Match.
 
Maybe they fear them rather than agree with them.

The myth that every muslim is a violent jihadist bent on the destruction of all who are not muslim still remains solely in your fear, rather than in reality.

I'll state it again:

he record also shows that when you asked what sect taught differently and suddenly found out that ALL of them did you were unable to admit your total ignorance and resorted to pretense and fallacy. (Again here with another sad attempt at ad hominem).

I'll be here to point that out every time.

Game. Set. Match.


I have not said every muslim is a terrorist, I have said Islam teaches this kind of violence. IF they don't follow it, they're good people, but bad muslims.
 
I have not said every muslim is a terrorist, I have said Islam teaches this kind of violence. IF they don't follow it, they're good people, but bad muslims.
So you are saying that of the billions of Muslims only a few are "good" Muslims because you say so, not because they are following the other three meanings rather than being misled into the fourth?

LOL. They are made up of a billion "good people" but "bad Muslims" and a few thousand "good muslims" who blow up "good people"?

You are hilarious.
 
So you are saying that of the billions of Muslims only a few are "good" Muslims because you say so, not because they are following the other three meanings rather than being misled into the fourth?

LOL. They are made up of a billion "good people" but "bad Muslims" and a few thousand "good muslims" who blow up "good people"?

You are hilarious.

Im saying "good are the muslims who don't kill non muslims just because they're non muslims" Yes. I say it. With the authority of me.

And don't forget about their general unwillingness to stop those around them from "misrepresenting islam". Newsflash, mason, that is islam.
Which sect has no terrorists again?
 
Damo, has a problem understanding flaws in judaism too. He basically likes big mythological abstractions which can be used as irrational reasons to kill.
 
*sigh*

You will see on this board arguments about how more muslims need to be braver and stand against terrorists from myself. However, I do not pretend that there are somehow more warlike muslims than there are peaceful ones. If all of them were part of what you want me to fear then we'd have no shot. Thankfully the vast majority of them are not. Your silly "they are bad muslims" because of it is just funny stuff.

I have no "problems" seeing flaws. I just have problems with painting the whole group of people with the same brush then attempting to make it seem as if you don't mean it that way by saying "well these few are good"...

The reality is, a very few are "bad" by your terms. Yet we are supposed to fear them as if all of them are if we follow your logic. And even fewer take any position on this inane "noahide" stuff that you fear with all your being as shown by your constant repetition of it.
 
*sigh*

You will see on this board arguments about how more muslims need to be braver and stand against terrorists.

I have no "problems" seeing flaws. I just have problems with painting the whole group of people with the same brush then attempting to make it seem as if you don't mean it that way by saying "well these few are good"...

The reality is, a very few are "bad" by your terms. Yet we are supposed to fear them as if all of them are if we follow your logic. And even fewer take any position on this inane "noahide" stuff that you fear with all your being as shown by your constant repetition of it.

Islam teaches violent jihad, It's true. It's not a stereotype. Some Muslims don't go all the way. That is true too.



Is God's Chosen People a racist concept damo?
 
Back
Top