Great source Trump Propaganda Network
there are other sources but USE YOUR HEAD-Clapper said what he said..he had no clue about Papadoupalislol
Gatewaypundit, the far right pro-Trump site. Still telling the same old lies.
pick any source,,the facts remain the same. Clapper said Papa wasn't on the radarwww.thegatewaypundit.com????
"The Gateway Pundit is a right-wing, far-right, pro-Trump website." - Wikipedia
Clapper wrote the Assessment from the FBI counterintelligence investigation.It sounds like you are the one willing to believe anything that come out against the investigation without discernment. There are a myriad of reasons Clapper may have not been aware of Papadopolous; the FBI, CIA and DNI are all seperate agencies and we do not know what information they were sharing.
and there was a time you could actually address an idea..that's long goneI know you don't believe it, but there was a time when Annoise actually had a modicum of intelligence.
but the claim is Papa "started the investigation"-Clapper says he never heard of him..So where is the actual source of the FBI investigation? It's not PapaWhy do you think he cites them?
I like the way they use Papadapolous as some proof that the timing is off. It was Australian intelligence that alerted the American intelligence agencies about what they heard, after the emails were made public by the Russians. They didn't have to mention the 'coffee boy'.
we know Mueller ison a fishing expedition, not "putting it all to gether" he's roaming around where he feels like and looking for all kinds of stuff -none ( to our knowledge) about Russian collusion.I subscribe to the investigations is still continuing and there are a lot of angles to this story and we don’t know how much all the agencies share information, but we do know Mueller is putting it all together.
Perhaps the FBI and CIA were still investigating him? I’m sure Mueller is connecting all the dots. This hasn’t unraveled anything. It isn’t unusual in government for one agency to be underinformed on what another agency is doing until it’s necessary.
There were other factors that I think were the stimulus for the investigation and the revelation about George Papadopoulos, which was not a name on my radar scope when I left…I think also was another factor,” Clapper said.
What diff does it make if he did or not? She did, and several times.Did Comey accuse Hillary of lying?
Really, how so?
there are other sources but USE YOUR HEAD-Clapper said what he said..he had no clue about Papadoupalis
but the claim is Papa "started the investigation"-Clapper says he never heard of him..So where is the actual source of the FBI investigation? It's not Papa
What diff does it make if he did or not? She did, and several times.
so there were factors(s)- plural .Read the following excerpts from your above quote....
1) There were other factors that I think were the stimulus for the investigation
2) the revelation about George Papadopoulos..... I think also was another factor,” Clapper said.
Forget about whether or not Papadopadoodle was on Clapper's radar screen. Has nothing to do with anything and certainly does not signal the unraveling of the investigation. Clapper says merely that the remarks in the London bar reported by the Australian govt were ANOTHER factor but not the only one.
Get your panties unwadded, annette.
Don't watch CNN. What NYT offering are you talking about?So, you don't believe the NYT? And, the story being run on CNN?![]()
What 'fell apart'?the day that fake news pappy thing came out, I literally said to myself "wait 24 hours to see how this falls apart" and sure enough...
I have gotten really good at seeing through fake news.
only 2 small collaborations:lol
It isn’t Clapper’s claim, is it, moron? Clapper’s claim is that the dossier cooroborated info ALREADY KNOWN to intelligence. What the fuck does that tell you?
whuich I personally don't believe, considering th DNC server was never subject to FBI forensics, but there it isClapper, just like every leftist blowhard claimed parts of the dossier have been corroborated.
When pressed for specifics, he only cited two claims, both of which have nothing to do with Russian collusion.
Vladimir Putin’s “animus” towards Hillary Clinton “and the determination of clearly favoring…Trump to win the presidency,” were the two dossier allegations that Clapper says have been corroborated,