NY Times 'Bombshell’ Unravels=> Clapper Admits Papadopoulos "not on my radar"
- Thread starter dukkha
- Start date
Fake News New York Times is doing everything they can to steer the public away from Hillary Clinton’s multi-million dollar garbage dossier the Deep State used in order to spy on Trump’s campaign.
The fake dossier ultimately sparked the ‘Russian collusion’ witch hunt, but the NY Times is now claiming Trump campaign volunteer George Papadopoulos got a little too drunk one night in a London pub and bragged to an Australian diplomat the Russians had ‘political dirt’ on Hillary.
A couple of drunk lads talking shop is what set in motion the ‘Russian collusion’ investigation?? Right.
James Clapper, the former head of the U.S. Intelligence community under Obama said in a Tuesday interview with CNN that George Papadopoulos was not on his “radar scope” when he left. Interesting.
On Saturday The New York Times implied Trump campaign volunteer George Papadopoulos set in motion the ‘Russian collusion’ investigation, not the Hillary-funded dossier.
The New York Times got DESTROYED within hours of publication…
James Clapper then hit the NY Times fake news article with a devastating blow. He’s never even heard of Papadopoulos…
“There were other factors that I think were the stimulus for the investigation and the revelation about George Papadopoulos, which was not a name on my radar scope when I left…I think also was another factor,” Clapper said.
Clapper, just like every leftist blowhard claimed parts of the dossier have been corroborated. When pressed for specifics, he only cited two claims, both of which have nothing to do with Russian collusion.
Vladimir Putin’s “animus” towards Hillary Clinton “and the determination of clearly favoring…Trump to win the presidency,” were the two dossier allegations that Clapper says have been corroborated, Chuck Ross of The Daily
Caller reported.
So head of intelligence had never heard of the dude that the NYT now claims launched the entire Trump-Russia probe?”
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/201...lapper-admits-papadopoulos-never-radar-video/
The fake dossier ultimately sparked the ‘Russian collusion’ witch hunt, but the NY Times is now claiming Trump campaign volunteer George Papadopoulos got a little too drunk one night in a London pub and bragged to an Australian diplomat the Russians had ‘political dirt’ on Hillary.
A couple of drunk lads talking shop is what set in motion the ‘Russian collusion’ investigation?? Right.
James Clapper, the former head of the U.S. Intelligence community under Obama said in a Tuesday interview with CNN that George Papadopoulos was not on his “radar scope” when he left. Interesting.
On Saturday The New York Times implied Trump campaign volunteer George Papadopoulos set in motion the ‘Russian collusion’ investigation, not the Hillary-funded dossier.
The New York Times got DESTROYED within hours of publication…
James Clapper then hit the NY Times fake news article with a devastating blow. He’s never even heard of Papadopoulos…
“There were other factors that I think were the stimulus for the investigation and the revelation about George Papadopoulos, which was not a name on my radar scope when I left…I think also was another factor,” Clapper said.
Clapper, just like every leftist blowhard claimed parts of the dossier have been corroborated. When pressed for specifics, he only cited two claims, both of which have nothing to do with Russian collusion.
Vladimir Putin’s “animus” towards Hillary Clinton “and the determination of clearly favoring…Trump to win the presidency,” were the two dossier allegations that Clapper says have been corroborated, Chuck Ross of The Daily
Caller reported.
So head of intelligence had never heard of the dude that the NYT now claims launched the entire Trump-Russia probe?”
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/201...lapper-admits-papadopoulos-never-radar-video/
Last edited:
Perhaps the FBI and CIA were still investigating him? I’m sure Mueller is connecting all the dots. This hasn’t unraveled anything. It isn’t unusual in government for one agency to be underinformed on what another agency is doing until it’s necessary.
this is in regards to the counter-intelligence investigation that supposedly was started by papa's drunk bragging.
Not Mueller
As I mentioned last week it was "thin gruel" to start a full scale FBI investigation as the NYTimes claims.
Now we see that explanation is bogus- Clapper wrote the assessment of Russian meddling.
Would he write an assessment based on not knowing how it started?
Really, how so?
Last edited:
www.thegatewaypundit.com????
"The Gateway Pundit is a right-wing, far-right, pro-Trump website." - Wikipedia
The investigation couldn't have been about Pap if Clap had never heard of him...and Fusion GPS is using this crapola to try and divert attention away from the dossier and their hand in it, too??? They're scrambling to find the right lie to give the public. Which one do YOU believe? Do you even understand what's going on here or are you just robotically and without discernment believing every single thing you hear that sounds like that will be the one that brings Trump down?
the claim is the pap guy started all of this.
It sounds like you are the one willing to believe anything that come out against the investigation without discernment. There are a myriad of reasons Clapper may have not been aware of Papadopolous; the FBI, CIA and DNI are all seperate agencies and we do not know what information they were sharing.
Yes, the FBI investigation, do they notify the DNI about every discovery? Do we know how this information was handled by the FBI?
Yes, and Mueller is piecing it all together
Clapper never claimed Papadopolous was responsible for the investigation. What he DID say was that the dossier validated info the IC already had.
Althea
Althea told me...
I know you don't believe it, but there was a time when Annoise actually had a modicum of intelligence.
Darth Omar
Russian asset
They can’t use the dossier as a basis for the Russian investigation because it’s unverified and slanderous. So they say it was based on a conversation between a couple of drunks lol.
What happened was the Hillary campaign/DNC complex, along with Podesta, started Russia mania; Strzok picked up the ball [the insurance policy-Dossier] and other actors ran with it.
Nunes is being stonewalled because the Dossier *really is* the only basis for the investigation, the usual suspects don’t want to talk about it and the Two Drunks is a diversion.
Sounds like we need an outside investigator to come in and look at it.