NY Mayor's Wife Was a Lesbian

Manatee said:
Prove that Mars' climate changes have been the exact same as Earth's or your argument is insignificant and inaccurate and should not be taken seriously. You can insult me all you want but unlike you I've backed up my arguments.
Click to expand...

doesn't have to be "the exact same" unless Mars happens to be in Earth's orbit path......which as I recall, it isn't......at least since we aren't dead I will assume it isn't......what is inaccurate (and insane) is to claim that global warming is manmade........

not only have you not backed up your arguments you haven't even raised an argument to explain the missing man made activities that caused the previous global warming cycles in earth's history.......unless you think "uh, maybe we had a volcano" is a rational argument.......
 
Manatee said:
Oh now you're going to post something? The second article in that search was an article written by one single scientist and at the very end says "Abdussamatov's work, however, has not been well received by other climate scientists." and the first article says skeptical in the title. The entire site is called skeptical science. Skeptics is not real science, it's not real facts, and it's an unreliable source. If this is where you think you've educated yourself you're wrong and should go to a real school.
Click to expand...

oooh....loookie.....liberal no likee sourceee....
 
PostmodernProphet said:
what do you have against National Geographic?......
Click to expand...

Did you read my comment? Did you read the article? One scientist and in the article it says "Abdussamatov's work, however, has not been well received by other climate scientists."

Okay, we did have a supervolcanic eruption. I'm positive and you can take a look at Yellowstone if you don't believe me.
 
PostmodernProphet said:
oooh....loookie.....liberal no likee sourceee....
Click to expand...

The name of the source is skeptical science. Skeptical means "not easily convinced; having doubts or reservations". The site shouldn't be used to make arguments like this because it's a skeptical myth that can't be proved with actual experiments and actual data.
 
Surely if the information you believed in was true you'd be able to find a reliable source that backs you up.
 
Manatee said:
Did you read my comment? Did you read the article? One scientist and in the article it says "Abdussamatov's work, however, has not been well received by other climate scientists."
Click to expand...
I gather Absussamatov didn't receive their work well either.....doesn't change the statistics does it?.....
 
Manatee said:
The name of the source is skeptical science. Skeptical means "not easily convinced; having doubts or reservations". The site shouldn't be used to make arguments like this because it's a skeptical myth that can't be proved with actual experiments and actual data.
Click to expand...

and yet, when actual data proves that we've had identical global warming cycles every 150k years you have no problem accepting the "science" that says its all man made?......
 
PostmodernProphet said:
sorry.....could not have caused the cycles we've had in the last 450k years....



http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yellowstone_Caldera
Click to expand...

There are plenty of other super volcanos or "large" volcanos around the world. Oh and don't use wikipedia as a reliable source. In college that's not allowed. Maybe if you went there you would know that and learn from actual places that tell you actual things that are actually proven to be real and not skeptical myths.
 
Manatee said:
There are plenty of other super volcanos or "large" volcanos around the world. Oh and don't use wikipedia as a reliable source. In college that's not allowed. Maybe if you went there you would know that and learn from actual places that tell you actual things that are actually proven to be real and not skeptical myths.
Click to expand...

Do you believe "Inconvenient truth"?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top