nut bag democrats first act in the house

[Legion]

this bill probably took up about 4 hours of their time, stupid little bitch. try to pretend you have an IQ, then try to post, stupid shit.

So you don't know how much time (or how many taxpayer dollars were expended) went into this laughable posturing. If it was 1 minute, it took too long. If it was 10 cents, that was too much.

Poverty?

Hunger?

Crime?

National defense?

Nope.

"honor all gender identities by changing pronouns and familial relationships".

how many hours did repubs waste looking for non-existent classified email on hillary's server, stupid little bitch? did you cry over that? and for what? not even a public reprimand...you pig.

Whatboutism.

 

[Sailor]

you trust harvard studies? those damn liberals in Massachusetts? here is a clue- obama vs. trump. any democrat vs. trump. any democrat against louis gohmert. any democrat, dead or alive vs. a slug like you.

Nobody trusts Harvard studies anymore. But it does go to show how dumb Democrats have become if Harvard has to step in an try to make an excuse for it.

 

[Hoosier Daddy]

That's what they want you to believe...

the same kind of pussified paranoid bullshit as - the democrats want to take your guns!! help! help! I'm being repressed!

 

[Legion]

why do you care? you don't give a fuck about the constitution or you wouldn't support trump and this latest vote fraud bullshit. so you need to shut the fuck up, hypocrite.

Did I say I cared?

I'm laughing at you and your pathetic DEMOCRATS wasting time and money on widow-dressing for the wokesters.

Poverty?

Hunger?

Crime?

National defense?

Nope.

"honor all gender identities by changing pronouns and familial relationships".

 

[Hoosier Daddy]

Nobody trusts Harvard studies anymore. But it does go to show how dumb Democrats have become if Harvard has to step in an try to make an excuse for it.

why do you think harvard was making an excuse for democrats being smarter than you stupid fuck pig republicans, sailor boy?

 

[Bulletbob]

you trust harvard studies? those damn liberals in Massachusetts? here is a clue- obama vs. trump. any democrat vs. trump. any democrat against louis gohmert. any democrat, dead or alive vs. a slug like you.

its a liberal study and your a liberal fag daddy . I just posted the facts and the link of the study if you dont like your fellow liberals finding then to bad for you fag daddy. get over it try being a man for a change punk.

 

[Hoosier Daddy]

Did I say I cared?

I'm laughing at you and your pathetic DEMOCRATS wasting time and money on widow-dressing for the wokesters.

Poverty?

Hunger?

Crime?

National defense?

Nope.

"honor all gender identities by changing pronouns and familial relationships".

but you are okay with them spending so many days in hearings about hillary's emails, and not finding enough dirt to even accuse her of a misdemeanor?

 

[Sailor]

why do you think harvard was making an excuse for democrats being smarter than you stupid fuck pig republicans, sailor boy?

Harvard did not say Democrats were smarter. And you prove the point perfectly. Dumb fuck Democrat.

 

[Hoosier Daddy]

Harvard did not say Democrats were smarter. And you prove the point perfectly. Dumb fuck Democrat.

but even a stupid shit punk trump stooge like you has to admit how much smarter I am than you and your whole family put together. and how obama soars over a stupid bitch like trump like an eagle soars over a bunch of maggots feasting on a dead rat in the sewer. right? how can you be smarter than even a fairly mature cucumber and support trump, bitch?

 

[Sailor]

but even a stupid shit punk trump stooge like you has to admit how much smarter I am than you and your whole family put together. and how obama soars over a stupid bitch like trump like an eagle soars over a bunch of maggots feasting on a dead rat in the sewer. right? how can you be smarter than even a fairly mature cucumber and support trump, bitch?

And runs in again to enforce the Harvard study. One cannot make this shit up!

 

[Hoosier Daddy]

And runs in again to enforce the Harvard study. One cannot make this shit up!

studies can be wrong. if there is such a study. but i know how stupid you and other trump voters are. and trump. so I win. suck on that.

 

[Legion]

but you are okay with them spending so many days in hearings about hillary's emails, and not finding enough dirt to even accuse her of a misdemeanor?

Whataboutism.

I'm laughing at you and your pathetic DEMOCRATS wasting time and money on widow-dressing for the wokesters.

Poverty?

Hunger?

Crime?

National defense?

Nope.

"honor all gender identities by changing pronouns and familial relationships".

 

[Hoosier Daddy]

Claim: A new Harvard study has shown that liberals have a lower average IQ than conservatives.


FALSE

Origins: On 8 October 2011, the IAHYM News Network web site published a
fictitious article claiming that liberals on average had lower IQs than conservatives.

The article, which held that Harvard University had conducted a study using “100,000 registered voters in 40 different states over the last twelve years,” has been reposted on several web sites over the years since its initial publication, and on 31 March 2015 it was shared as a factual news story on the website Blogster:


While Blogster republished the majority of the satirical IAHYM News Network article, the site failed to include the disclaimer that was included at the bottom of the original version:


Oh yeah, and everything in that bullsh*t you just read is completely and totally false. There has been no such conclusive study, and all of the “Finds” are based on public paranoia. Chances are good that if you are a conservative, you were empowered by this new find.
If you, even for a second, thought this find might be true, you are probably an idiot.

While it might conceivably be true that those positioned at one end of the political spectrum are smarter on average than those at the other end, that notion certainly has not been proved by a fictitious study conducted at Harvard University.

Last updated: 31 March 2015

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/politiqs/

 

[Sailor]

studies can be wrong. if there is such a study. but i know how stupid you and other trump voters are. and trump. so I win. suck on that.

Not this one. As you keep proving.

 

[Hoosier Daddy]

Whataboutism.

I'm laughing at you and your pathetic DEMOCRATS wasting time and money on widow-dressing for the wokesters.

Poverty?

Hunger?

Crime?

National defense?

Nope.

"honor all gender identities by changing pronouns and familial relationships".

not even a day, bitch. you pinhead repubs spent weeks investigating hillary and found nothing. so go fuck yourself.

 

[Legion]

not even a day, bitch.

How do you know long the staffers spent on this ludicrous bullshit?

You don't.

If it was 1 minute, it took too long. If they spent 10 cents, that was too much.

Poverty?

Hunger?

Crime?

National defense?

Nope.

"honor all gender identities by changing pronouns and familial relationships".

you pinhead repubs spent weeks investigating hillary and found nothing. so go fuck yourself.

Whataboutism.

 

[Geeko Sportivo]

whats that got to do with democrats banning the use of terms that describe gender ? granted in your case the use of he she is probably best.
I like a toilet you dont have to flush a bunch of times it conserves water

Dude, I have never had to flush twice in my lifetime.

So you Republicans are just full of shit! NEXT CASE PLEASE!

 

[Geeko Sportivo]

What "great legislature" was that?

Trump ordered a federal review of water efficiency standards in bathroom fixtures, complaining that 'people are flushing toilets 10 -15 times. He said the Environmental Protection Agency was looking into the issue on his recommendation.

While the president said the EPA was looking at the standards, a review of the WaterSense program was mandated under 2018 legislation passed by Congress that said the agency should look at any regulations adopted before 2012. That means the government is forced to revisit specifications for tank-type toilets, lavatory faucets and faucet accessories, shower heads, flushing urinals, and weather-based irrigation controllers.

Those regulations include a 20% reduction in water use on tank-type toilets compared to standards adopted in 1992, and a 32% reduction in maximum water flow on lavatory faucets, according to the EPA.

 

[Legion]

Trump ordered a federal review of water efficiency standards in bathroom fixtures, complaining that 'people are flushing toilets 10 -15 times. He said the Environmental Protection Agency was looking into the issue on his recommendation. While the president said the EPA was looking at the standards, a review of the WaterSense program was mandated under 2018 legislation passed by Congress that said the agency should look at any regulations adopted before 2012. That means the government is forced to revisit specifications for tank-type toilets, lavatory faucets and faucet accessories, shower heads, flushing urinals, and weather-based irrigation controllers. Those regulations include a 20% reduction in water use on tank-type toilets compared to standards adopted in 1992, and a 32% reduction in maximum water flow on lavatory faucets, according to the EPA.

I don't see any reference to a "great legislature".

Do you mean like Donald Trump's great legislature to increase the flushing power of Toilets. You just can't make this shit up folks. Donald Trump admitted to his Trumplicans that he personally had to flush his toilet 10 times to flush his crap on down the drain! Could this be- BECAUSE DONALD TRUMP IS JUST SO FULL OF SHIT?

 

[Into the Night]

big deal. get a life, little bitch.

So you disagree with what the House just did, do you? The use of 'bitch' is sexist.