Cancel 2020.1
Canceled
My understanding is the Chinese comment was a joke. And if that was taken out of context by the media...well, you get the idea lol.
Got any link for that at all?
It was a tweet. There was no other context to it.
My understanding is the Chinese comment was a joke. And if that was taken out of context by the media...well, you get the idea lol.
Got any link for that at all?
It was a tweet. There was no other context to it.
It was a *single* Tweet. Do you have any links to where Trump develops the idea?
He has talked about it - I'll dig some stuff up. But you said you understood it to be a joke & "taken out of context." Were you just making that up?
Ill be waiting.
No you need to, trust me!Maybe don needs to?
He hasn't changed course, but you can be sure the climate blog will do their damnedest to force him.The notion that humans may contribute to climate change is fairly mainstream, climate skeptic wise.
The million dollar question is how much? It still leaves a whole raft of related and unanswered questions like 'does mans activities over ride the sun [many respected scientists give that a resounding no!] or can we do anything significant about it via regulation and etc.
I wouldn't rush to judgement on Trump changing course lol. Some will anyway because they can't help themselves.
Why didn't you answer my question?
Were you making that up? You made the claim -you should be able to back it up.
It was but the climate mafia will go all out to ensure that the funding taps are kept full on.My understanding is the Chinese comment was a joke. And if that was taken out of context by the media...well, you get the idea lol.
It was a joke ffs!!Why didn't you answer my question?
Were you making that up? You made the claim -you should be able to back it up.
It was but the climate mafia will go all out to ensure that the funding taps are kept full on.
Sent from my Lenovo K52e78 using Tapatalk
Nothing with China?
The notion that climate change is a hoax isn't all that fringe. Though 'hoax' is probably too strong a term and not the way I'd put it.
Lots of monied interests are on both sides of the equation---which is ample reason to be skeptical of it. Calling it a hoax is no different than labeling climate skeptics 'deniers'. And I'll go out on a limb and say you are ok with the latter but not the former.
Especially when Trump says it lol.
You just completely reversed your position. Now, you're trying to justify calling it a hoax, instead of backing up your comment that your "understanding" was that he was joking, and that the media took his words out of context.
No kidding; you just did that. You tried to have it every which way.
And don't presume to know what I think on this issue. I have had more criticism for the left on climate science than for the right.