No evidence for Trump claim on 'terrorists': government sources

They could just as easily come through our northern border. Your solution?



Not really, Canada has a stricter immigration policy and they are very strict on vetting their refugees, they do it way better than us.


Most likely they would come in on a work or student visa. my point is not that I am overly concerned with our southern border, but that we have to go through all sorts of stupid shit in the name of antiterrorism for shit thats never happened, but you all think it's impossible and no need to worry about terrorists coming throughough our southern border.


I guarantee you more terrorists have come through mexico than in my shoes or laptop. or my bottle of water.
 
Not really, Canada has a stricter immigration policy and they are very strict on vetting their refugees, they do it way better than us.


Most likely they would come in on a work or student visa. my point is not that I am overly concerned with our southern border, but that we have to go through all sorts of stupid shit in the name of antiterrorism for shit thats never happened, but you all think it's impossible and no need to worry about terrorists coming throughough our southern border.


I guarantee you more terrorists have come through mexico than in my shoes or laptop. or my bottle of water.

You have chosen to avoid the question. I wonder why.
 
You have chosen to avoid the question. I wonder why.



I literally answered it directly. In order for me to answer it in the preconceived notion you want, it would have to become a strawman.



I know you are fishing for some "you hate brown people" idiocy, which begs the question, why do you libs always threaten to leave for canada and not mexico?
 
I literally answered it directly. In order for me to answer it in the preconceived notion you want, it would have to become a strawman.




I know you are fishing for some "you hate brown people" idiocy, which begs the question, why do you libs always threaten to leave for canada and not mexico?

Anyone could enter Canada as a tourist, student or businessman and the come through our northern border. yet you dont seem to care, just as you dont seem to care about those who enter the US legally and overstay their visas. Its only the southern border and the hoards of brown people you care about.

I prefer Mexico, the weather is far better.
 
Anyone could enter Canada as a tourist, student or businessman and the come through our northern border. yet you dont seem to care, just as you dont seem to care about those who enter the US legally and overstay their visas. Its only the southern border and the hoards of brown people you care about.

I prefer Mexico, the weather is far better.




I care equally about this from both borders, very little.
 
President Donald Trump said on Tuesday that U.S. authorities had “caught 10 terrorists,” citing it as a reason for why the United States should build a wall on its Mexican border

Did they catch 10 terrorist? If not Trump lied. Face it. Say it out loud a couple of times. Trump lied and lies constantly.
 
A report last month from the Center for Immigration Studies (CIS) found:


.
•From intelligence community sources with access to protected government information, the Center for Immigration Studies has learned that at least 100 migrants from "countries of interest", encountered between 2012 and 2017 at or en route to the southern border, matched the U.S. terrorism "watch lists" known as the Terrorist Identities Datamart Environment (TIDE), or the Terrorist Screening


so tell us nut-bags

what should bother us, that Trump said "ten" and the time frame he gave,
or
that there is documented evidence, as reported by the Center of Immigration Studies that terrorists from "countries of interest",
people on "terror watch lists" are showing up mixed in, regardless of when or how many.

are you comfortable with just 15 being caught, no way any more got through?

play with your own families safety, not mine

Center for Immigration Studies? :lolup::rofl2:
 
Not really, Canada has a stricter immigration policy and they are very strict on vetting their refugees, they do it way better than us.


Most likely they would come in on a work or student visa. my point is not that I am overly concerned with our southern border, but that we have to go through all sorts of stupid shit in the name of antiterrorism for shit thats never happened, but you all think it's impossible and no need to worry about terrorists coming throughough our southern border.


I guarantee you more terrorists have come through mexico than in my shoes or laptop. or my bottle of water.
I think you got it about right. anti-terrorosim in the USA is about identifying targets and surveillance.
The less targets, the easier surveilance.

why would anyone not want the border secured,so we can ID potentials coming in? as opposed to illegals?
 
I think you got it about right. anti-terrorosim in the USA is about identifying targets and surveillance.
The less targets, the easier surveilance.

why would anyone not want the border secured,so we can ID potentials coming in? as opposed to illegals?





agreed. I am for an almost open immigration system, based on merit first. But I agree we need to secure our border, though a fence is not the answer imo. Dry up the bennies.
 
agreed. I am for an almost open immigration system, based on merit first. But I agree we need to secure our border, though a fence is not the answer imo. Dry up the bennies.
agree again.
can you imagine a merit based immigration system with secure borders?
A fence not the only answer - Immigration reform would go a long way (changing asylum laws for ex.)

But I have no confidence in a Dem not enforcing or illegal entry drying up . Hence the wall
 
Back
Top