No collusion!

domer76 said:
Stupid fuck, in criminal law, nobody is found “innocent”. They are found guilty or not guilty. I can’t figure out, other than your collective massive stupidity, why you can’t comprehend the difference.
Click to expand...

I KNOW THAT!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Dannnnnnnnnnnng.:palm:
Quick making this more complicated than it is.

Exonerating someone means that they are innocent. No on "exonerated" anyone here. The Trump campaign is not guilty of all allegation/charges/whatever they were looking for.
Being a prosecutor though like Mullet just likes to toss in the phrase "not exonerated" whenever they lose a case or don't find what they wanted.
It's over. Go take a nap. Wake up happy and get with your life. :palm:
 
domer76 said:
What part of “not exonerated” got past you?
Click to expand...

giphy.gif
 
Stretch said:
Yeah. So? My post was about the word exonerated.
Click to expand...

Let's put it this way. Here's a scenario all of us have seen on the news at one time or the other. A woman is found murdered. The police gather clues. They have a pretty good idea that her bf did it. There is some evidence, but unfortunately not enough to prove him guilty "beyond a reasonable doubt." The crime eventually goes into the cold case files.

That's the same standard Barr & Rosenstein (who you used to lovingly refer to as "Rosenweasel," no?) used when they declined to charge Trump & Co with criminal activities. Does that mean they are innocent and did nothing? Nope. It just means that there is not enough evidence to secure a conviction, in their experience as PAs. As Mueller said, Trump was not exonerated. They simply did not have enough evidence to convict.
 
Trump's problems are probably going to be related to bank fraud and possibly tax evasion.

I'm hoping that the Democrats in the House time it so that solid evidence of his criminality begin coming to light around this time next year and stretch out through the summer.
 
Stretch said:
I KNOW THAT!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Dannnnnnnnnnnng.:palm:
Quick making this more complicated than it is.

Exonerating someone means that they are innocent. No on "exonerated" anyone here. The Trump campaign is not guilty of all allegation/charges/whatever they were looking for.
Being a prosecutor though like Mullet just likes to toss in the phrase "not exonerated" whenever they lose a case or don't find what they wanted.
It's over. Go take a nap. Wake up happy and get with your life. :palm:
Click to expand...

I keep trying here, illiterate, but it doesn’t sink in for you simpletons,

The comment that he is “not exonerated” does not mean he is innocent.

Are all you fucking RWers homeschooled with the lack of English comprehension?

Look uo the the difference between “not gulity” and “innocent”. Then, try to figure out why prosecutors choose to take things to trial or not. Not based on guilt or innocence, stupid shit, but based in their judgement of meeting the prosecutorial burden of proof.

Amazing that so many lack the basics of law and civics. You are among the most ignorant.
 
ThatOwlWoman said:
That's where they're going to hang him. Meanwhile, the righties can dance and twirl and celebrate their "nothingburger," while the rest of us realize what a sad thing it is that we have a POTUS whose election was tainted by a foreign power -- an enemy of the U.S. no less -- pulling the strings to put him in the WH.
Click to expand...

We can dance if we want to. We can leave your friends behind.
Your friends don't dance, and if they don't dance, well they're no friends of mine
 
A Trump safety dance video would be funny as hell. Too bad I'm not skilled in video production or I would whip something up.

We'll settle for this
 
ThatOwlWoman said:
Let's put it this way. Here's a scenario all of us have seen on the news at one time or the other. A woman is found murdered. The police gather clues. They have a pretty good idea that her bf did it. There is some evidence, but unfortunately not enough to prove him guilty "beyond a reasonable doubt." The crime eventually goes into the cold case files.

That's the same standard Barr & Rosenstein (who you used to lovingly refer to as "Rosenweasel," no?) used when they declined to charge Trump & Co with criminal activities. Does that mean they are innocent and did nothing? Nope. It just means that there is not enough evidence to secure a conviction, in their experience as PAs. As Mueller said, Trump was not exonerated. They simply did not have enough evidence to convict.
Click to expand...

There was no evidence from jump. No "dead body" so to speak. Nothing but Hillary's phony pee dossier. Plus she was given a "friendly" heads up warning that Russians might be interfering with the election. They didn't bother extending the same courtesy to the Trump campaign. The fix was in. The rest is history.
 
domer76 said:
I keep trying here, illiterate, but it doesn’t sink in for you simpletons,

The comment that he is “not exonerated” does not mean he is innocent.

Are all you fucking RWers homeschooled with the lack of English comprehension?

Look uo the the difference between “not gulity” and “innocent”. Then, try to figure out why prosecutors choose to take things to trial or not. Not based on guilt or innocence, stupid shit, but based in their judgement of meeting the prosecutorial burden of proof.

Amazing that so many lack the basics of law and civics. You are among the most ignorant.
Click to expand...

"The comment that he is “not exonerated” does not mean he is innocent." What is wrong with you????????????????? I said that I KNOW that!!!!!!!!!!
 
Nomad said:
Trump's problems are probably going to be related to bank fraud and possibly tax evasion.

I'm hoping that the Democrats in the House time it so that solid evidence of his criminality begin coming to light around this time next year and stretch out through the summer.
Click to expand...

You guys really can’t help yourselves can you
 
Jarod said:
I said it all along, I would accept the findings and until the report I would not predict if there was collusion.
Click to expand...

Liar! Legion Troll has your posts showing otherwise and I believe you even admitted you were wrong.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top