Nomad
Verified User
You guys really can’t help yourselves can you
Yeah, we really can't help not wanting a criminal running our country.
You guys obviously have no problem with it, though.
You guys really can’t help yourselves can you
Stupid fuck, in criminal law, nobody is found “innocent”. They are found guilty or not guilty. I can’t figure out, other than your collective massive stupidity, why you can’t comprehend the difference.
Yeah, we really can't help not wanting a criminal running our country.
You guys obviously have no problem with it, though.
What has he been found guilty of or even had a criminal trial for?
What was Hillary found guilty of or even had a criminal trial for?
Nothing, that's what.
But it didn't stop the Trumptard maggots from drooling "Lock her up!!!!" at your turd's campaign rallies.
As I recall federal inmate Michael Flynn led a few of those chants.
“The Special Counsel therefore did not draw a conclusion one way or the other as to whether the examined conduct constituted obstruction.“
Insufficient evidence... Hahhhahahaha, egg on your face...
Pathetic dodge of the questions you sniveling coward.
And I never said Hillary was guilty or lock her up. Nice try.

What was Hillary found guilty of or even had a criminal trial for?
Nothing, that's what.
But it didn't stop the Trumptard maggots from drooling "Lock her up!!!!" at your turd's campaign rallies.
As I recall federal inmate Michael Flynn led a few of those chants.
Why can’t you guys stop talking about Crooked Hillary?
Why should we?
You guys can't and neither can your mentally deranged orange idiot Messiah.
Stupid fuck, in criminal law, nobody is found “innocent”. They are found guilty or not guilty. I can’t figure out, other than your collective massive stupidity, why you can’t comprehend the difference.
""While this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him," Barr quotes Mueller as saying.""
https://www.justplainpolitics.com/s...te-trump-on-obstruction&p=2954381#post2954381
Stupid fuck, in criminal law, nobody is found “innocent”. They are found guilty or not guilty. I can’t figure out, other than your collective massive stupidity, why you can’t comprehend the difference.
I keep trying here, illiterate, but it doesn’t sink in for you simpletons,
The comment that he is “not exonerated” does not mean he is innocent.
Are all you fucking RWers homeschooled with the lack of English comprehension?
Look uo the the difference between “not gulity” and “innocent”. Then, try to figure out why prosecutors choose to take things to trial or not. Not based on guilt or innocence, stupid shit, but based in their judgement of meeting the prosecutorial burden of proof.
Amazing that so many lack the basics of law and civics. You are among the most ignorant.