cancel2 2022
Canceled
Life is too short having to deal with partisan hacks like you, the article stands on its own merits.Explain to us if you can why you think this supposed bombshell is such a big deal?
Sent from my Lenovo K8 Note using Tapatalk
Life is too short having to deal with partisan hacks like you, the article stands on its own merits.Explain to us if you can why you think this supposed bombshell is such a big deal?
The poll you dismissed that shows public trust is at a horrendous low for the fourth estate?
What factual evidence have you provided? All you have said is 'they be most outstanding!'... yet nothing to back that up. Why is that Thing? You haven't provided a shred of evidence to support your view. I have.
and there you go again. I did not say EVERY journalist was biased for the left. that is simply your absurdity.
I stated that the bias is most certainly there and the fourth estate is destroying itself because of it... BOTH from the left (cnn, ny times, wa post) AND the right (fox).
The New York Times senior White House correspondent Maggie Haberman and reporter Kenneth Vogel are slamming Hillary Clinton's campaign and the Democratic National Committee (DNC), saying they lied about funding for the so-called Trump dossier.
referring to Clinton campaign lawyer Marc Elias.
he Washington Post in a bombshell report late Tuesday said that Elias's legal firm hired Fusion GPS, a private research firm based in Washington, D.C., to provide opposition research on candidate Donald Trump.
Fusion GPS hired former British MI6 intelligence officer Christopher Steele to lead research, eventually resulting in a 35-page document that included claims against the Trump campaign and its alleged ties to Russia along with scandalous accusations about the candidate himself.
The dossier was shopped around to numerous media outlets for months before being published by BuzzFeed last January.
"Folks involved in funding this lied about it, and with sanctimony, for a year," Haberman tweeted to her more than 650,000 followers on Tuesday
![]()
^ former British intelligence officer Christopher Steele compiled the dossier on President Trump’s alleged ties to Russia.
The DNC in a statement late Tuesday attempted to distance its current leadership, including DNC Chairman Tom Perez, from the dossier funding.
“Tom Perez and the new leadership of the DNC were not involved in any decision-making regarding Fusion GPS, nor were they aware that Perkins Coie was working with the organization," said DNC spokeswoman Xochitl Hinojosa.
"But let’s be clear, there is a serious federal investigation into the Trump campaign’s ties to Russia, and the American public deserves to know what happened," she said.
http://thehill.com/homenews/media/3...-blast-dems-over-trump-dossier-funding-claims
trump the poor victim.....
They cheated him..
He defended his lying bastard kid for dirty tricks?
Said (& the trumpkins defended it) anyone would do it, but now???
The swamp needs to be drained & some ppl removed, starting w/ him & his family of crooks...
The FBI started the ENTIRE Russian collusion crap (counterintelligence investigation) because of the Steele dossier.
Then Comey "briefs" Trump (giving respectability to the fake dossier)
Clinton lies to the NYTimes and to the public by not coming clean her hire (Fusion GPS) paid Steele for fake news.
At some point one really needs to look at the Clinton lies and the Deep State shenanigans
as deligitimization.
as I've been saying all along.
Thought they were fake news?
I kid, I kid. See, what you see here are journalists w/ integrity, and who - oh! - are NOT beholden to a party or persona.
See, unlike posters who go crazy about this but don't care about the Trump campaign & good ol' WikiLeaks.
It's all gotta fit neatly into the narrative, eh?
clinton lied, trump lies but that is ok.......... fuck them both dude... You have one measure for her & another for your hero.............
The country is going to hell, we look like an offshoot of the jerry fuckin springer show to the rest of the world..
you hire a low grade, low class actor & this is what you get.............
TO bad Johnson or Stein didn't win so we could argue about policy instead of this shit.................
AMEN!!!!!
as always they are only forced to report on it when everybody else has.
We have been saying for months now that democrats funded the steele dossier.
step 1: make dossier
step 2: use dossier to get fisa warrants
step 3: use FBI to conduct surveillance on opposing presidential campaign
step 4: ??????
step 5: profit and show nixon what a dumbass he is.
obama wiretapped trump brother thing.
I think I'd prefer to hear you say this:
Is a public opinion poll on trust in the media evidence of widespread media bias?
Yes or no.
Nice retreat.
I've said many times that there is bias. My contention is that most do their jobs properly. And that is the assumption - innocent until proven guilty.
Until you have more than an opinion poll or "look at the headlines!," you've got nuthin'.
Yes. It is.
Would you say that the poll indicates that the populace isn't smart enough to see how the media is really doing an 'outstanding job'???
yes or no?
also... what would you provide as evidence that the media is doing an 'outstanding job'???
I can't help but notice you keep asking me for evidence, yet you refuse to provide any of your own.
The onus is on you - you have accused the media of widespread bias.
Wouldn't you agree w/ that basic principle of justice and fair play? Or are you that far gone?
Oh - and your answer was wrong. No...a public opinion poll is not "evidence." You used to be more discerning & logical. Now, you're just like good ol' TD up there.

The onus is on you - you have accused the media of widespread bias.
Wouldn't you agree w/ that basic principle of justice and fair play? Or are you that far gone?
Oh - and your answer was wrong. No...a public opinion poll is not "evidence." You used to be more discerning & logical. Now, you're just like good ol' TD up there.
I think I'd prefer to hear you say this:
Is a public opinion poll on trust in the media evidence of widespread media bias?
Yes or no.
Yes. It is.
Would you say that the poll indicates that the populace isn't smart enough to see how the media is really doing an 'outstanding job'???
yes or no?
also... what would you provide as evidence that the media is doing an 'outstanding job'???
I can't help but notice you keep asking me for evidence, yet you refuse to provide any of your own.
The onus is on you - you have accused the media of widespread bias.
Wouldn't you agree w/ that basic principle of justice and fair play? Or are you that far gone?
Oh - and your answer was wrong. No...a public opinion poll is not "evidence." You used to be more discerning & logical. Now, you're just like good ol' TD up there.
Shit fer brains; I am using one of anattas common trite replies against her.
You need to read your last 10 posts when you sober up....... God made a delete button for a reason, don't forget that tomorrow..
well, I will if I want to; but I don't have to...