New York Times reporters blast Dems over Trump dossier funding claims

That isn't factual. It just shows the effectiveness of propaganda and repetition.

We saw the same thing in polls where many believed Saddam was behind 9/11.

That's the best you could do after all of that searching? That and "theyz all bad!"?

Again you moron... what do you propose? That I post 100000 links to articles here? people don't trust the media just as they don't trust Trump, just as they don't trust Congress... you seem to think it is because people are gullible. What you fail to realize is that is a learned response due to the non stop bullshit from the media, Trump and Congress.

The only propaganda is the moronic crap you are spewing forth that the media is doing 'outstanding' (on the whole... you do leave some room for the outliers in your warped world)
 
You're making this too easy, SF.

Yeah... you are the one proving the point. You think you are smarter than most. You are not. As I stated, you are falling to Desh like responses because you cannot refute what is being said.

You simply yell 'propaganda'! or 'you lying'... just as Desh would do. quite pathetic how far you have fallen
 
What a great strategy. Keep hammering home that the entire media is biased and repeating "fake news" every other minute. Eventually, those traditional propaganda methods will work, and the public at large will just believe it without really knowing if it's true or not. Then, when they're polled, they'll just say "yeah, it's fake news and they're all biased."

Then, the propogandists can use that poll and say, see! We were right. The media is biased.

Diabolical. Genius.
 
That isn't factual. It just shows the effectiveness of propaganda and repetition.

We saw the same thing in polls where many believed Saddam was behind 9/11.

That's the best you could do after all of that searching? That and "theyz all bad!"?

What is really funny is that you don't realize it was shitty fucking reporting that caused those poll results on 9/11 and Saddam
 
Yeah... you are the one proving the point. You think you are smarter than most. You are not. As I stated, you are falling to Desh like responses because you cannot refute what is being said.

You simply yell 'propaganda'! or 'you lying'... just as Desh would do. quite pathetic how far you have fallen

I'm not the one who thinks people are guilty until proven innocent. You are.

Give me a break w/ your "quite pathetic." You simply don't think anymore. Which is a shame.
 
What a great strategy. Keep hammering home that the entire media is biased and repeating "fake news" every other minute. Eventually, those traditional propaganda methods will work, and the public at large will just believe it without really knowing if it's true or not. Then, when they're polled, they'll just say "yeah, it's fake news and they're all biased."

Then, the propogandists can use that poll and say, see! We were right. The media is biased.

Diabolical. Genius.

What is truly a great strategy is sitting around with your head up your ass refusing to believe that the fourth estate IS the propaganda.
 
What is really funny is that you don't realize it was shitty fucking reporting that caused those poll results on 9/11 and Saddam

Nope. It was Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld and others in the admin who kept lumping them together in sentences, without really saying it.

Make up whatever you want though. Fun to watch you flail.
 
I'm not the one who thinks people are guilty until proven innocent. You are.

Give me a break w/ your "quite pathetic." You simply don't think anymore. Which is a shame.

Poor thing... tell me... who is it that I thought was guilty until proven innocent?

You believed the Brown bullshit without evidence, you believed the Martin bullshit without evidence... then when evidence came out that showed you were wrong, you ignored it or pretended it wasn't true.
 
Thanks Desh... I knew I could count on you to try an tie me to Trump simply because you cannot refute what was said. What is next? Will you call me a Russian? A Racist?

Typical Desh.

What is it that I'm not able to refute?

What factual evidence have you provided? "Look at RCP"?
 
Or was it "just look at all of the headlines on RCP!"

I can't remember. Either way, simply irrefutable. Damning evidence that every journalist is crazy-biased for the left.
 
Nope. It was Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld and others in the admin who kept lumping them together in sentences, without really saying it.

Make up whatever you want though. Fun to watch you flail.

So, they were able to say whatever they wanted and the fourth estate was unable to respond in any way? Is that your story Thing? That the reporters were either 'duped' or simply 'too stupid to do their jobs'?

What is it that prevented proper reporting back then? You saying Bush was such a genius that he tricked them all? I know that is what the Dems line has always been... 'Bush, who we call idiot, tricked us!!!'
 
What is it that I'm not able to refute?

What factual evidence have you provided? "Look at RCP"?

The poll you dismissed that shows public trust is at a horrendous low for the fourth estate?

What factual evidence have you provided? All you have said is 'they be most outstanding!'... yet nothing to back that up. Why is that Thing? You haven't provided a shred of evidence to support your view. I have.
 
Or was it "just look at all of the headlines on RCP!"

I can't remember. Either way, simply irrefutable. Damning evidence that every journalist is crazy-biased for the left.

and there you go again. I did not say EVERY journalist was biased for the left. that is simply your absurdity.

I stated that the bias is most certainly there and the fourth estate is destroying itself because of it... BOTH from the left (cnn, ny times, wa post) AND the right (fox).
 
Back
Top