New Video Footage Could Be Legal Magic for ‘QAnon Shaman’

equivocation-fallacy-l.jpg


Chansley's lawyer saw the footage Carlson played and was interviewed by Carleson yesterday. He stated unequivocally that he never saw it before, and had put into discovery that all video of Chansley inside the Capitol building be made available to him. The US attorneys had access and failed to provide that evidence. That's pretty damning on their part.

Sorry. Where is the evidence that he asked the prosecutor for the videos during the trial?
 
Sorry. Where is the evidence that he asked the prosecutor for the videos during the trial?

again, you display total ignorance of how the justice system works.........those are questions asked BEFORE trial, not during, UNLESS that evidence was found by the lawyer in some other way.
 
i'm curious about something. Is it your extreme hatred towards those MAGA supporters that is blinding you to the obvious violations of the prosecutor withholding evidence? or are you really just that ignorant about it?

I have no hatred for them.

I am simply asking for evidence of the lawyer asking for evidence.
 
obviously

Another reason you are Dumber than Most, dumbass. You're in violation of Rule #16 while I am not.

Your idiocy is one reason why you think you can murder Americans and get away with it. If you weren't such a loudmouthed chickenshit, I'd fear for you going to prison, but since you are only a Keyboard Warrior, you should be safe.
 
Everyone hates Doc Dutch.

You go, girl! :hand:

Have you considered going back to college? Community college is relatively inexpensive and often has night classes. You don't even need a four-year degree for many good occupations: EMT, bookkeeper, computer programming, etc.
 
Sorry. Where is the evidence that he asked the prosecutor for the videos during the trial?
again, you display total ignorance of how the justice system works.........those are questions asked BEFORE trial, not during, UNLESS that evidence was found by the lawyer in some other way.
^^^
Sez the dumbass who can't even understand the rules on JPP. :laugh: :rofl2: :laugh:
 
Writ of Habeas Corpus based on the knowing and intentional failure to disclose exculpatory evidence (that was already in the Govt’s hands)

That's a Brady violation. If the AG is found in violation of the Brady Act he could be barred from all testimony in courts rendering him useless as a prosecutor and not eligible for the job. Though I doubt that will happen, Brady violations can destroy a lawyer.
 
Back
Top