New study in Nature shows pause is real

tinfoil said:
They can say that the anthropogenic forcing dominates, but the historical record doesn't show it. Natural variability caused the pause. That's not dominating. Do you even understand what the word dominate means? Are you even able to think for yourself?
Click to expand...

You know the answer to that already, all he knows is how to chase ambulances.

Sent from my Lenovo K52e78 using Tapatalk
 
Last edited:
Yaya said:
No kidding, there is not a more vulgar person I've come across on the internet. Has he made a post without insults or curse words? I normally don't care, but it seems like every single post he makes has vulgarity and insults in it.
Click to expand...

lol

Virgin ears, lying shitweasel? If you weren't such a chronic liar, there would be no need to call a spade a spade, would it, bitch?
 
Sailor said:
I ask again, how many of them actually have seen it? Other than on a computer model? All of what the are talking about has been occurring for decades now. This is nothing new at all. When any of them can show me or anyone a town that has just gone underwater from rising sea levels, I might believe it. Reality is far, far away different from hype and computer models.
Click to expand...

They haven't, it is just alarmist bullshit. Even NOAA acknowledges that sea level rise is of the order 1.7-1.8mm per year or under 20cm per century. That really does sound terrifying, doesn't it??


https://tidesandcurrents.noaa.gov/sltrends/globalregional.htm
 
To be fair here, what is occurring is coastal erosion due to some of these massive storms that have been occurring. It is not the rising sea levels that are causing some of these increases in flooding, it is that there is not as much coast line buffer as there once was.
 
Sailor said:
About 1/16" rise a year. That is not causing any new flooding unless some fenderhead built right on the mean low water line 25 years ago.
Click to expand...
Yes about 8" per century, have you seen Waterworld? Well Kevin Costner is going to do a remake entitled Waterpuddle!

Sent from my Lenovo K52e78 using Tapatalk
 
Sailor said:
To be fair here, what is occurring is coastal erosion due to some of these massive storms that have been occurring. It is not the rising sea levels that are causing some of these increases in flooding, it is that there is not as much coast line buffer as there once was.
Click to expand...
Some of it is also due to the land sinking.

Sent from my Lenovo K52e78 using Tapatalk
 
Milagro said:
Some of it is also due to the land sinking.

Sent from my Lenovo K52e78 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

Yes. The droughts we( and other places on this planet) were/are experiencing drew down the underground water levels for example among other things. You bring up an excellent point often overlooked.
 
Milagro said:
I'll just ban the lot of them in future, none of them is capable of arguing the science. McAwful even quotes a left wing hack writer and journalist he found on Wiki as part of his defence ffs.

Sent from my Lenovo K52e78 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

Poor whiney British bitch. You just hate getting called on your cherry-picking, cut-and-paste scientific dishonesty, don't you?

The PUSSY way out? Ban those that would call you on your bullshit.
 
domer76 said:
Poor whiney British bitch. You just hate getting called on your cherry-picking, cut-and-paste scientific dishonesty, don't you?

The PUSSY way out? Ban those that would call you on your bullshit.
Click to expand...
I call it cunt culling, if you can't discuss the subject civilly then you can just fuck off.

Sent from my Lenovo K52e78 using Tapatalk
 
Milagro said:
Precious few actually, they tend to use temperature datasets like HadCRUT4 or proxy data obtained by scientists out in the field. It is especially telling that the likes of NOAA tend to use surface temperatures to backup their alarmist predictions even though satellites are far more accurate and provide 247/465 coverage of the whole planet.

Sent from my Lenovo K52e78 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

Your criticism of writers and researchers versus field work would ring less hollow if you had any science at all, of any kind.
 
Sailor said:
I ask again, how many of them actually have seen it? Other than on a computer model? All of what the are talking about has been occurring for decades now. This is nothing new at all. When any of them can show me or anyone a town that has just gone underwater from rising sea levels, I might believe it. Reality is far, far away different from hype and computer models.
Click to expand...

Translation: "I want anecdotes, damnit! Fuck this imperceptible accretion of scientific evidence on a macro scale over time. Stories! give me some stories!"

Just turn in the tv to the weather channel. They provide plenty of that stuff.
 
Micawber said:
Translation: "I want anecdotes, damnit! Fuck this imperceptible accretion of scientific evidence on a macro scale over time. Stories! give me some stories!"

Just turn in the tv to the weather channel. They provide plenty of that stuff.
Click to expand...
Man you are a supremely dozy cunt, I wouldn't mind but the clue's in his name ffs.

Sent from my Lenovo K52e78 using Tapatalk
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top