Of course it is. That's why I called out that other idiot on his "science".
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
New study in Nature shows pause is real
- Thread starter cancel2 2022
- Start date
Of course it is. That's why I called out that other idiot on his "science".
Yes so that why you quoted a left wing hack like Aaronovitch ffs!
Sent from my Lenovo K52e78 using Tapatalk
The leftist hack simply is supporting the orthodoxy. He wins.
Bring your science or stfu. Your opinion means precisely dick.
Plus I used a direct quote of a person within the wiki article on Milagros think tank source. The deprecation of wiki is only relevant in event there is a bona fide question as to the accuracy of the quoted material.
lol
Keep flailing, cherry picker
cancel2 2022
Canceled
Yes that's right don't address the real issue of the two decade warming pause just try to deflect and distract in true ambulance chaser fashion.Correct. I googled your source because I distrust you, always having been disappointed. The first hit was wiki, which immediately revealed your source was a biased policy think tank. I also noticed your source was not science at all, but a skewed hit piece about real science.
You are and will remain, I'm afraid, a partisan and not a scientist.
Sent from my Lenovo K52e78 using Tapatalk
Ok, I will allow one Tourettes from you but that's your last. Anymore and you are banned.
Sent from my Lenovo K52e78 using Tapatalk
You're already on the Pussy List, bitch. More banning doesn't get you extra credit, vagina.
cancel2 2022
Canceled
I will not be taking your advice thanks all the same. However you will be thread banned in future as you contribute absolutely nothing of any worth.The leftist hack simply is supporting the orthodoxy. He wins.
Bring your science or stfu. Your opinion means precisely dick.
Sent from my Lenovo K52e78 using Tapatalk
cancel2 2022
Canceled
Ok that's it, I gave you a chance and you blew it.You're already on the Pussy List, bitch. More banning doesn't get you extra credit, vagina.
Sent from my Lenovo K52e78 using Tapatalk
Cancel 2018.2
Oh, hi
Ok, I will allow one Tourettes from you but that's your last. Anymore and you are banned.
Sent from my Lenovo K52e78 using Tapatalk
No kidding, there is not a more vulgar person I've come across on the internet. Has he made a post without insults or curse words? I normally don't care, but it seems like every single post he makes has vulgarity and insults in it.
I will not be taking your advice thanks all the same. However you will be thread banned in future as you contribute absolutely nothing of any worth.
Sent from my Lenovo K52e78 using Tapatalk
Of any worth (to your cause)
cancel2 2022
Canceled
Transmogrify!! A pompous word for an equally pompous arsehole.Try as you might you won't transmogrify your chemistry degree into climate scientist. Author, pundit, chemist priest lawyer butcher baker candlestick maker.
None are climate scientists anymore than that diatribe by some aristocrat funded oil tank is science.
Sent from my Lenovo K52e78 using Tapatalk
Transmogrify!! A pompous word for an equally pompous arsehole.
Sent from my Lenovo K52e78 using Tapatalk
It has a pseudoscientific etymology. That should appeal to you.
cancel2 2022
Canceled
I'll just ban the lot of them in future, none of them is capable of arguing the science. McAwful even quotes a left wing hack writer and journalist he found on Wiki as part of his defence ffs.No kidding, there is not a more vulgar person I've come across on the internet. Has he made a post without insults or curse words? I normally don't care, but it seems like every single post he makes has vulgarity and insults in it.
Sent from my Lenovo K52e78 using Tapatalk
cancel2 2022
Canceled
Precious few actually, they tend to use temperature datasets like HadCRUT4 or proxy data obtained by scientists out in the field. It is especially telling that the likes of NOAA tend to use surface temperatures to backup their alarmist predictions even though satellites are far more accurate and provide 247/465 coverage of the whole planet.I wonder how many Climate scientists actually spend time out in the climate. Verifying their predictions..
Sent from my Lenovo K52e78 using Tapatalk
Precious few actually, they tend to use temperature datasets like HadCRUT4 or proxy data obtained by scientists out in the field. It is especially telling that the likes of NOAA tend to use surface temperatures to backup their alarmist predictions even though satellites are far more accurate and provide 247/465 coverage of the whole planet.
Sent from my Lenovo K52e78 using Tapatalk
I personally do not see any ocean rise of even remote significance, well, around the world. While the premise may have some validation to it, the alarmist hype of which it is being projected is taking away that validity. Just my thought.
Ok that's it, I gave you a chance and you blew it.
Sent from my Lenovo K52e78 using Tapatalk
Fuck! How am I going to sleep at night, PUSSY?
He said "dominant" not just "signal present"
It's little misrepresentations like this that out you as a hack, by the way.
By the way, do you have a point?
They can say that the anthropogenic forcing dominates, but the historical record doesn't show it. Natural variability caused the pause. That's not dominating. Do you even understand what the word dominate means? Are you even able to think for yourself?
cancel2 2022
Canceled
Like a baby probably; crying, wetting yourself and throwing up in the middle of the night.Fuck! How am I going to sleep at night, PUSSY?
Sent from my Lenovo K52e78 using Tapatalk
cancel2 2022
Canceled
Yeh but what do you know compared to these keyboard climatologists??I personally do not see any ocean rise of even remote significance, well, around the world. While the premise may have some validation to it, the alarmist hype of which it is being projected is taking away that validity. Just my thought.
Sent from my Lenovo K52e78 using Tapatalk
I personally do not see any ocean rise of even remote significance, well, around the world. snip.
Flooding of Coast, Caused by Global Warming, Has Already Begun
For decades, as the global warming created by human emissions caused land ice to melt and ocean water to expand, scientists warned that the accelerating rise of the sea would eventually imperil the United States’ coastline.
Now, those warnings are no longer theoretical: The inundation of the coast has begun. The sea has crept up to the point that a high tide and a brisk wind are all it takes to send water pouring into streets and homes.
Federal scientists have documented a sharp jump in this nuisance flooding — often called “sunny-day flooding” — along both the East Coast and the Gulf Coast in recent years. The sea is now so near the brim in many places that they believe the problem is likely to worsen quickly. Shifts in the Pacific Ocean mean that the West Coast, partly spared over the past two decades, may be hit hard, too.
These tidal floods are often just a foot or two deep, but they can stop traffic, swamp basements, damage cars, kill lawns and forests, and poison wells with salt. Moreover, the high seas interfere with the drainage of storm water.
In coastal regions, that compounds the damage from the increasingly heavy rains plaguing the country, like those that recently caused extensive flooding in Louisiana. Scientists say these rains are also a consequence of human greenhouse emissions.
“Once impacts become noticeable, they’re going to be upon you quickly,” said William V. Sweet, a scientist with the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration in Silver Spring, Md., who is among the leaders in research on coastal inundation. “It’s not a hundred years off — it’s now.”
In many of the worst-hit cities, mayors of both parties are sounding an alarm.
“I’m a Republican, but I also realize, by any objective analysis, the sea level is rising,” said Jason Buelterman, the mayor of tiny Tybee Island, one of the first Georgia communities to adopt a detailed climate plan.
continued
https://www.nytimes.com/2016/09/04/...by-global-warming-has-already-begun.html?_r=0