New Respect for Condalizza

No you misogynistic prick I'm talking about that war on women you say doesn't exist. Notice it's all from the GOP...most of the women in America did, and they voted accordingly.

Obama could be appointing more Supreme court judges, so it does matter who is President! Those state right restricting laws can be overturned by the Supremes!
 
Absolutely correct!!! Elections matter. I'm gunning for tea bagger in the next two years...I want them OUT.
 
What alternate reality do you guys create for yourselves? The left viciously attacked Condi with vile racist attacks.

Who was that? Some troll on a bulletin board carries the same weight as an entire network and multiple radio personalities in right wing bizarro world.
 
I would not support Condi. She is a neocon tainted by her association with Cheney, Rumsfeld and Bush. I have a little more respect for her as she always seemed to be a bit more even in her approach, but she is not what the GOP needs.
 
No you misogynistic prick I'm talking about that war on women you say doesn't exist. Notice it's all from the GOP...most of the women in America did, and they voted accordingly.

I believe it was Serge Gainsbourg that said women love a misogynist and for a ugly swine he sure had more than his fair share including Brigitte Bardot and Jane Birkin.

As usual someone says something which is then completely misconstrued, I didn't say that there wasn't something happening especially in the red states but it has been turned into a full blown war and the first casualty of war is the truth. Roe v Wade was enacted in 1973 during the NIxon era by the Supreme Court and unless you know different cannot be overturned or amended without going back to the SCOTUS. What the individual states do would not be affected by the colour of the national government unless a Romney admin had attempted to appoint an extremely reactionary new judge. I am merely pointing out that it was not a very realistic scenario except in the fevered imagination of the Vag-Ams.
 
Last edited:
Women were the winners in this election! Our political voice and muscle are becoming louder and stronger. I am excited by the prospects for our country as women become more numerous in business and politics.

The entire world won in this election.
 
Well if he can talk for himself why don't you keep your sticky beak out of things? SJ for all his faults is right about calling you the Queen Bee, you are a control freak and it pisses you off to not be in the middle of things. I have a lot more respect for Haiku than for Bijou, who only ever came on here to proselytize and stir up shit. I can see why you miss her as she was your unofficial deputy.

Oh, did you manage to chase off Bijou?
 
I believe it was Serge Gainsbourg that said women love a misogynist and for a ugly swine he sure had more than his fair share including Brigitte Bardot and Jane Birkin.

As usual someone says something which is then completely misconstrued, I didn't say that there wasn't something happening especially in the red states but it has been turned into a full blown war and the first casualty of war is the truth. Roe v Wade was enacted in 1973 during the NIxon era by the Supreme Court and unless you know different cannot be overturned or amended without going back to the SCOTUS. What the individual states do would not be affected by the colour of the national government unless a Romney admin had attempted to appoint an extremely reactionary new judge. I am merely pointing out that it was not a very realistic scenario except in the fevered imagination of the Vag-Ams.

Um, no, better check again.
 
I believe it was Serge Gainsbourg that said women love a misogynist and for a ugly swine he sure had more than his fair share including Brigitte Bardot and Jane Birkin.

As usual someone says something which is then completely misconstrued, I didn't say that there wasn't something happening especially in the red states but it has been turned into a full blown war and the first casualty of war is the truth. Roe v Wade was enacted in 1973 during the NIxon era by the Supreme Court and unless you know different cannot be overturned or amended without going back to the SCOTUS. What the individual states do would not be affected by the colour of the national government unless a Romney admin had attempted to appoint an extremely reactionary new judge. I am merely pointing out that it was not a very realistic scenario except in the fevered imagination of the Vag-Ams.

It is a war and the truth is apparent to anyone capable of reading. I gave you a huge list of what's going on and you come back with the vacuous argument about Roe vs Wade...sorry but that's a huge fail. It isn't reactionary to read, learn, observe and comprehend the intentions and actions of the GOP in regard to womens health from birth control all the way through to abortion.
 
Oh, did you manage to chase off Bijou?

I believe that she has been run off a number of boards, I doubt that I scared her so much that she ran away from here. I frankly cannot recall having even one civil discourse with her, I just don't have a lot of time for bombast, baloney and bluster.
 
I believe that she has been run off a number of boards, I doubt that I scared her so much that she ran away from here. I frankly cannot recall having even one civil discourse with her, I just don't have a lot of time for bombast, baloney and bluster.

I miss her and if you drove her off, you are an asshole.
 
Um, no, better check again.

See man that's what you always do, here's a thing. Why don't you tell me where I am wrong and if your argument is powerful enough then I will agree with you. That's what debate is all about or at least it should be.
 
I believe that she has been run off a number of boards, I doubt that I scared her so much that she ran away from here. I frankly cannot recall having even one civil discourse with her, I just don't have a lot of time for bombast, baloney and bluster.

Summer break :-)
 
See man that's what you always do, here's a thing. Why don't you tell me where I am wrong and if your argument is powerful enough then I will agree with you. That's what debate is all about or at least it should be.

O.K.
The Supremes ruled on constitutionality in Roe vs Wade. Congress can legislate any new laws they want, all the Supremes can do is rule on the constitutionality.

A prior ruling does not prevent future legislation in any way, shape or form.
 
Sometimes I am not even sure you are really a liberal.

I don't believe that I ever said I was a liberal per se, I voted Conservative at the last election but those labels are fairly meaningless as David Cameron is probably left of Obama on many issues.
 
Back
Top