New evidence shows Flynn innocent, Obama criminals falsely prosecuted him

I don’t have a link but my understanding is that Flynn and Obama had a policy difference of opinion related to terrorism and that was the basis for the ‘warning’. They have smeared Flynn as a shady character that Trump should have avoided.

Truth. And that was always the way with Obama. Anyone who got in the way of Democrat power was tyrannically and lawlessly retaliated against and silenced.

WHY LT. GENERAL MICHAEL FLYNN MATTERS THE MOST TO TRUMP

As is well documented, General Flynn publicly disagreed with the Obama White House, urging a comprehensive rethink of our military strategy. That was rejected, and he was fired by Obama.

thumbnail
 
Flynn is not innocent.

He pleaded guilty.

Flynn likely would have won the trial. The wrong date on the 302 makes it inadmissible as evidence.

Problem is trials are expensive and Flynn was already broke and they threatened his son. So yeah, Flynn plead guilty. Whether Flynn is actually guilty remains an open question.

But why were investigators asking Flynn questions that they already knew the answer to? What alleged *crime* were they investigating? Why didn’t investigators warn Flynn that he was a target in an investigation?
 
Flynn likely would have won the trial. The wrong date on the 302 makes it inadmissible as evidence.

Problem is trials are expensive and Flynn was already broke and they threatened his son. So yeah, Flynn plead guilty. Whether Flynn is actually guilty remains an open question.

But why were investigators asking Flynn questions that they already knew the answer to? What alleged *crime* were they investigating? Why didn’t investigators warn Flynn that he was a target in an investigation?

Isn't that called entrapment, I can't help feeling that there is fuckton of malfeasance going on.
 
I can't even see the OP, and I know it's moronic.

It is.

He's essentially saying that what Flynn did was as legal as buying an ice cream cone.

Ya gotta wonder why someone would lie to the FBI about "buying an ice cream cone."
 
It is.

He's essentially saying that what Flynn did was as legal as buying an ice cream cone.

Ya gotta wonder why someone would lie to the FBI about "buying an ice cream cone."

Here is the way this is supposed to work, Frankie.

Agents approach Flynn as if they are interested in something besides seeing if Flynn’s verbal testimony matches the transcript of his conversation with Kislyak. Flynn, just be sure they aren’t up to something, asks ‘am I a target or subject of a criminal investigation or are you just interested in what the Russian diplomat told me?’

If the agents were honest and told Flynn he was being investigated, Flynn would have asked ‘for what crime?’ Or more probably, Flynn would say ‘you can go away now, I don’t want to talk with you—about anything’. It would have saved himself a lot of grief and money. Unfortunately for Flynn, he doesn’t get a do-over.

How do you defend this crap, Frankie. Forget Trump. How do you defend THIS?
 
Here is the way this is supposed to work, Frankie.

Agents approach Flynn as if they are interested in something besides seeing if Flynn’s verbal testimony matches the transcript of his conversation with Kislyak. Flynn, just be sure they aren’t up to something, asks ‘am I a target or subject of a criminal investigation or are you just interested in what the Russian diplomat told me?’

If the agents were honest and told Flynn he was being investigated, Flynn would have asked ‘for what crime?’ Or more probably, Flynn would say ‘you can go away now, I don’t want to talk with you—about anything’. It would have saved himself a lot of grief and money. Unfortunately for Flynn, he doesn’t get a do-over.

How do you defend this crap, Frankie. Forget Trump. How do you defend THIS?


There really isn't anything to defend. It's great fun watching Republicans feed on Republicans
 
It is.

He's essentially saying that what Flynn did was as legal as buying an ice cream cone.

Ya gotta wonder why someone would lie to the FBI about "buying an ice cream cone."

Liberal literacy issues persist. As those who can read learned in the OP, he never lied, and he only caved because they started threatening to destroy his family.

Learn how to read. :laugh:
 
Here is the way this is supposed to work, Frankie.

Agents approach Flynn as if they are interested in something besides seeing if Flynn’s verbal testimony matches the transcript of his conversation with Kislyak. Flynn, just be sure they aren’t up to something, asks ‘am I a target or subject of a criminal investigation or are you just interested in what the Russian diplomat told me?’

If the agents were honest and told Flynn he was being investigated, Flynn would have asked ‘for what crime?’ Or more probably, Flynn would say ‘you can go away now, I don’t want to talk with you—about anything’. It would have saved himself a lot of grief and money. Unfortunately for Flynn, he doesn’t get a do-over.

How do you defend this crap, Frankie. Forget Trump. How do you defend THIS?

A blatant abuse of power that no other prosecutor would ever get away with. This is the kind of unethical Mike Nifong-level corruption that gets people disbarred.
 
There really isn't anything to defend. It's great fun watching Republicans feed on Republicans

You denying that this would normally get a prosecutor fired, disbarred, and possibly prosecuted doesn't magically transform reality into something it isn't.

thumbnail


FBI's entrapment of Gen. Flynn was despicable

Federal district judge Emmet Sullivan likewise seems quite perturbed by the latest information about the Flynn case. With Flynn’s sentencing imminent, Sullivan suddenly ordered prosecutors to produce any existent memoranda regarding their conduct of the interview in which Flynn lied.

And for good reason. The investigators’ treatment of Flynn, as described in a memo filed with the court by Flynn’s lawyers, looks like a textbook case of unethical entrapment.
 
Here is the way this is supposed to work, Frankie.

Agents approach Flynn as if they are interested in something besides seeing if Flynn’s verbal testimony matches the transcript of his conversation with Kislyak. Flynn, just be sure they aren’t up to something, asks ‘am I a target or subject of a criminal investigation or are you just interested in what the Russian diplomat told me?’

If the agents were honest and told Flynn he was being investigated, Flynn would have asked ‘for what crime?’ Or more probably, Flynn would say ‘you can go away now, I don’t want to talk with you—about anything’. It would have saved himself a lot of grief and money. Unfortunately for Flynn, he doesn’t get a do-over.

How do you defend this crap, Frankie. Forget Trump. How do you defend THIS?

The title of this thread, Darth, is: New evidence shows Flynn innocent, Obama criminals falsely prosecuted him.

It is laughable.

Flynn is not innocent...no matter your concerns about what the FBI agents should or should not have done.

He lied.

What you are saying is, "He should not have lied."

I agree with that.
 
A blatant abuse of power that no other prosecutor would ever get away with. This is the kind of unethical Mike Nifong-level corruption that gets people disbarred.

And they get on me for calling him Mullet.

In Mullet’s defense, the interview occurred before he was appointed. The problem is, Mullet picked it up in order to squeeze Flynn. So I guess there is no defense lol.

Though again, there’s a chance Mullet wasn’t aware of just how sketchy it was until after he indicted Flynn. And it’s certainly possible Mullet wasn’t aware of the date discrepancy on the 302 at the time the indictment was made. But that means Mullet [more likely, one of the democrat-donors working under him] was just plain old incompetent.

Doesn’t look good no matter how you slice it.
 
Liberal literacy issues persist. As those who can read learned in the OP, he never lied, and he only caved because they started threatening to destroy his family.

Learn how to read. :laugh:

You poor sycophantic sucker. I actually do pity people like you.

One day, if you are lucky and mature, you will look back on what you are saying today...and realize what an asshole you are being right now.
 
A blatant abuse of power that no other prosecutor would ever get away with. This is the kind of unethical Mike Nifong-level corruption that gets people disbarred.

Said another way:

Mommy...they are picking on us. Make them stop.

Make them stop now, Mommy.;)
 
The title of this thread, Darth, is: New evidence shows Flynn innocent, Obama criminals falsely prosecuted him.

It is laughable.

Flynn is not innocent...no matter your concerns about what the FBI agents should or should not have done.

He lied.

What you are saying is, "He should not have lied."

I agree with that.

You’ll literally defend anything so long as they stop Trump.

That’s an abomination, Frankie.
 
Back
Top