New evidence shows Flynn innocent, Obama criminals falsely prosecuted him

I can't even see the OP, and I know it's moronic.

thumbnail
 
Fox is really scraping the bottom of the barrel with Gregg Jarrett.

Literally 100% off-topic personal smears. At least kudzu rose slightly above Neanderthal level to hurl off-topic smears at the author of the article this time, instead of the OP. For liberals, this is being creative and original.

:laugh:
 
Maybe you can explain how it was Flynn was unmasked. Or why was he unmasked.

That's crazy talk. We can't veer away from grade school insults to actually discuss the topic with facts and logic. You do realize liberals are involved, right? That automatically means we will spend 90% or more of our time dealing with fallacies and hysterical crying.
 
Last edited:
Obama warned Trump about Flynn BEFORE the inauguration.

First: Let me congratulate liberals on only taking twelve posts to transition from lashing out with butthurt insults to comically stupid "counterpoints" this time. :hand:

Second: Yes, Obama...the guy who used a fake DNC-funded "report" to illegally spy on his opponent during a major national election (approximately a thousand times worse than Watergate) and to stage a hilariously bogus witch hunt based on the absurd conspiracy theory that a couple of Facebook posts influenced the election...warned President Trump that he didn't trust Flynn (being denounced by the terrorist-funding ACORN president should be seen as a strength, rather than as a flaw), and this answers Darth's question about how or why Flynn was unmasked...how, exactly?

Flynn's contacts with Russia were perfectly legal. His only real offense was not communicating those contacts properly, which is jay-walking compared to things like using hammers and Bleachbit to irreversibly destroy evidence and obstruct investigations into major felonies.

thumbnail
 
"How could I know that the lying I intended to do and did was wrong? You forgot to tell me that, FBI"

Do you TOTAL LOSERS AND TRAITORS even think about anything? Like...even superficially? In your, I mean within your
retarded limited Republican abilities...

all due respect, of course....:palm:

thumbnail


And from the article:

They show that even the FBI agents who interviewed Flynn about his contacts with Russian Ambassador to the U.S. Sergey Kislyak concluded Flynn was telling the truth. But Flynn’s statements about those contacts later became the basis of the charge against him of lying to the FBI.

Can't tell if you're just semi-literate and can't comprehend what you read, too brainwashed and stupid to take in new information, or just a dishonest partisan hack (while hysterically lashing out and accusing others of doing what only you are actually doing).

:cool:
 
Don't lie..... Duh. Dont lie to the FBI? Triple duh.

Say the people who cried foul for over a year straight when Bill Clinton was impeached for lying under oath, and who adore Obama, and who voted for Hillary. :rofl2:

And again, he didn't lie (try comprehending what you read).

Only a retarded Fox consuming LOSER and TRAITOR possibly could think this would sell.

"Losers" is a term better reserved for the vagina hat-wearing crybullies who can't accept the election and use what are ultimately jaywalking-level offenses to insist on overthrowing a duly-elected president (what an actual traitor looks like, too, by the way)...all while ignoring far worse (actual) scandals by Obama and Hillary, and crying about "democracy" despite being the only actual threat to it.

thumbnail


Take your Midol and breathe into your paper bag there, tantrum-throwing Neanderthal. :laugh:
 
Last edited:
Flynn is not innocent.

He pleaded guilty.

:stup2:

Except the document just released shows that he didn't do the thing he was convicted for (lying), which kind of means the opposite of what you're saying. Duh. Try comprehending the OP.

And you might plead guilty too if they threatened to personally destroy your son to coerce you. Way to be a dishonest hypocrite.

thumbnail
 
First: Let me congratulate liberals on only taking twelve posts to transition from lashing out with butthurt insults to comically stupid "counterpoints" this time. :hand:

Second: Yes, Obama...the guy who used a fake DNC-funded "report" to illegally spy on his opponent during a major national election (approximately a thousand times worse than Watergate) and to stage a hilariously bogus witch hunt based on the absurd conspiracy theory that a couple of Facebook posts influenced the election...warned President Trump that he didn't trust Flynn (being denounced by the terrorist-funding ACORN president should be seen as a strength, rather than as a flaw), and this answers Darth's question about how or why Flynn was unmasked...how, exactly?

Flynn's contacts with Russia were perfectly legal. His only real offense was not communicating those contacts properly, which is jay-walking compared to things like using hammers and Bleachbit to irreversibly destroy evidence and obstruct investigations into major felonies.

thumbnail

Maybe they will get around to it lol.

I don’t have a link but my understanding is that Flynn and Obama had a policy difference of opinion related to terrorism and that was the basis for the ‘warning’. They have smeared Flynn as a shady character that Trump should have avoided.

And yes, that has nothing to do with the price of tea in China.

Anyone *sincerely* interested in criminality will give a hard look at what was going on *around* Flynn, rather than Flynn’s jay-walking. If 302’s were changed in order to nab Flynn, that constitutes a WAY bigger crime than anything Flynn did. The ONLY way the agents interviewing Flynn could have known what he told Kislyak would be if they unmasked Flynn and their conversation was disseminated within the agency.

Someone better have a damn good reason for that happening because that constitutes a crime—against Flynn!
 
Back
Top