New batch of Epstein files show Todd Blanche is lying...

QP! said:
Heh stupid.

That is Trump's current DoJ, refusing to comply with the law that was just forced on Trump that says the mens names cannot be redacted and protected and yet you see above the men are all redacted and protected by them.

It is Trumps current DoJ who is in the interview above saying the DoJ is not aware of any co conspirators and if they were they would be investigating and prosecuting them. He is saying this is a crime that only Epstein and Maxwell did and no one else participated.. He was crystal clear saying this is all just a myth that these co conspirators exist. And yet we have the emails between FBI agents (10 of them) who are discussing the names (redacted again) of the co conspirators they are investigating before someone at DoJ KILLED THAT INVESTIGATION.

Hey stupid., be less stupid. This is all on Trumps DoJ who can simply follow the law that was just passed and unredact and stop protecting the men.
Click to expand...
Is it the same 10 FBI agents that decided to raid Mar-A-Lago, fuckface?
Because they're all fired now. :BKick:
Why didn't they do something then, dipshit? Obviously illegal things happened, but Orange Man Bad took priority, huh?
And it would have been Biden's DOJ that killed that investigation, Licker of Dicks.
 
QP! said:
@Matt Dillon does not give a crap about any of this since Trump is implicated and the one covering it up. So pedophilia and grooming no longer matter.


----------
Cite

The Epstein Files Transparency Act (H.R. 4405, 2025) prohibits redacting the names of public figures (including men named in the files) except under specific exemptions (such as victim privacy or active investigations). Below are the exact operative passages from the enrolled bill text.



1. Prohibition on redacting due to embarrassment or political sensitivity​


This is the key section often cited:




This clause is what prevents agencies from redacting names merely because the individuals involved might be prominent or politically sensitive.



2. Requirement to produce an unredacted list of named officials / politically exposed persons​


Another important requirement:




This provision directly mandates an unredacted list of named officials or politically exposed individuals.
Click to expand...
@Matt Dillon expresses his dislike in my prior post that the Epstein Transperacy law says the pedophile men cannot be protected.
 
Matt Dillon said:
Is it the same 10 FBI agents that decided to raid Mar-A-Lago, fuckface?
Because they're all fired now. :BKick:
Why didn't they do something then, dipshit? Obviously illegal things happened, but Orange Man Bad took priority, huh?
And it would have been Biden's DOJ that killed that investigation, Licker of Dicks.
Click to expand...
Nice lie you tell yourself to excuse Trump covering for pedophiles.

Regardless of who is the agent why are those men's names redacted when the law says they cannot do that?
 
Matt Dillon said:
Who was the agent, shitbird? When did that happen? Hmm?
STFU Ignorant commietard.
Click to expand...

Listen here shit stain.

If you think the prior agents to Trump were corrupt or incompetent, then that is the reason you should want Trumps DoJ to investigate and expose this.

Regardless of who the prior agents or DoJ was we know these emails exist now...

aja7r5.jpg


aja7us.jpg


aja7x8.jpg
 
That Todd Blanche, in the interview i posted is saying every one WRONGLY seems to think there is things to investigate and co conspirators outlined in the Epstein files, and he says he is here to tell us that is not true... just shows how brazen he is with his lies and he will lie about everything unless you can show him proof to his face.

EVERYONE, should want the above emails investigated NOW, especially if you think prior DoJ or FBI involved prior were curropt ot incompetant.

That @Matt Dillon is contorting himself to try and find reasons why it should NOT be investigated and the pedophiles protected tells you all you need to know about the magat cult.
 
@Matt Dillon @Damocles @T. A. Gardner @FastLane , etc, not a single finger to raise over the DoJ redacting the name of someone messaging Jeffrey Epstein saying "thanks for the fun night... your littlest girl was a little naughty"???

Do you guys think this guy is speaking out size' or by 'age' when he says 'littlest girl'.?

The law (Epstein Act) specifically says this guys name CANNOT be redacted, and yet the DoJ did and Todd Blanche went on TV this last weekend saying there is nothing to see here. It was just Epstein and Maxwell and no one else. No co conspirators to even investigate.
 
the above, imo, is the ultimate Magat cult loyalty tesgt. Will you hold your nose and ignore what is happening with Trump's DoJ, or will you call it out as wrong? If this was Biden's DoJ would you take the same 'look away.. no comment' approach?

Reading that email should make anyones skin crawl and knowing Trump and his DoJ are doing everything they can to protect people like that while denying they exist, even as we see their conversations leaked that should not be ignored.
 
QP! said:
Todd Blanche did a Press conference (time stamped video below) where he basically claimed the DOJ has zero evidence that there were any co conspirators (men) in the Epstein case. Basically saying, if you draw the conclusion that Epstein trafficed hundreds of women to himself.

The problem for Blanche is here are just a sampling of documents that came out from the Epstein files...

aja7r5.jpg



Here is a discussion between DoJ officials years ago, during an investigation naming (now redacted) men, they saw as co conspirators.

aja7us.jpg


aja7x8.jpg





So why is Trump's DOJ redacting these names when the new law by Congress specifically says it is illegal to do so?

@FastLane @Damocles @T. A. Gardner , etc... how would you defend the above or suggest this is something to be ignored or not worth comment?
Click to expand...
They are still hiding millions of files to protect the guilty.
 
Matt Dillon said:
Trump released the files, retard. And-?
Click to expand...
He's still hiding millions of files, Mattie Mensa.

www.theguardian.com

Jeffrey Epstein files: don’t be fooled. Millions of files are still unreleased | Moira Donegan

Federal prosecutors had identified 6 million files that were ‘potentially responsive’ to the law, but only released 3.5. Why?
www.theguardian.com www.theguardian.com
The justice department released a trove of 3.5m files related to the dead financier and pedophile sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein on Friday, with deputy attorney general Todd Blanche declaring that the release would likely be the last major declassification of files relating to Epstein. Federal prosecutors had identified 6 million files that were “potentially responsive” to the law, meaning that there are millions of files that have still not been released.
 
Blanche is Trump's old personal lawyer. He is the guy who sat down with Ghislaine offereing her any deal he could to get her to make Trump look good. Of course, nobody is transcribing the discussions. He gave her things she was not entitled to get, due to trafficking in underage girls is considered a heinous offense. He was dishing things out until she took the deal.
 
Nordberg said:
Blanche is Trump's old personal lawyer. He is the guy who sat down with Ghislaine offereing her any deal he could to get her to make Trump look good. Of course, nobody is transcribing the discussions. He gave her things she was not entitled to get, due to trafficking in underage girls is considered a heinous offense. He was dishing things out until she took the deal.
Click to expand...
MAGAts will scream that it's a Leftist Plot to sully Trump's name.
 
Just want to keep pointing out how we will never see @FastLane , @T. A. Gardner , @Damocles and others here give two fucks about what we are now seeing come out of the Epstein files and how Trumps DoJ is now defying the law to continue to protect these men and redact their names.

Something they would be triggered over if this was Biden DoJ, while showing moral outrage over pedophilia but simply because it is Trump they could not give less fucks.




aja7r5.jpg


aja7us.jpg


aja7x8.jpg
 
QP! said:
Just want to keep pointing out how we will never see @FastLane , @T. A. Gardner , @Damocles and others here give two fucks about what we are now seeing come out of the Epstein files and how Trumps DoJ is now defying the law to continue to protect these men and redact their names.

Something they would be triggered over if this was Biden DoJ, while showing moral outrage over pedophilia but simply because it is Trump they could not give less fucks.




aja7r5.jpg


aja7us.jpg


aja7x8.jpg
Click to expand...
Correct! I don't give a flying fuck about the Epstein files and could care less who was fucking who or fat fingering or whatever whoever. It doesn't interest me in the least.
 
T. A. Gardner said:
Correct! I don't give a flying fuck about the Epstein files and could care less who was fucking who or fat fingering or whatever whoever. It doesn't interest me in the least.
Click to expand...
would your post history support that?

Would a search show you completely ignoring all the Biden and Clinton, accusations around sexual abuse and scandal?

I am not going to look but without looking i would bet money that you not only cared but were a main person here pushing many of those stories and that you suddenly found 'you don't care about pedophilia, etc' the minute Trump was implicated in these scandals.
 
QP! said:
would your post history support that?
Click to expand...

Yes.
QP! said:
Would a search show you completely ignoring all the Biden and Clinton, accusations around sexual abuse and scandal?
Click to expand...

Yes. I might make a comment or two, but it isn't going to be some running topic that goes on endlessly.
QP! said:
I am not going to look but without looking i would bet money that you not only cared but were a main person here pushing many of those stories and that you suddenly found 'you don't care about pedophilia, etc' the minute Trump was implicated in these scandals.
Click to expand...
I really don't care about sex scandals in general. I might comment once or twice on one but that's generally it. Epstein is a nothing burger to me and the latest of many such nothing burgers.
 
QP! said:
Just want to keep pointing out how we will never see @FastLane , @T. A. Gardner , @Damocles and others here give two fucks about what we are now seeing come out of the Epstein files and how Trumps DoJ is now defying the law to continue to protect these men and redact their names.

Something they would be triggered over if this was Biden DoJ, while showing moral outrage over pedophilia but simply because it is Trump they could not give less fucks.




aja7r5.jpg


aja7us.jpg


aja7x8.jpg
Click to expand...
All the Pedo President supporters will live in denial of these emails. To them, raping young girls isn't even on their radar when it comes to pushing a White Nationalist authoritarian federal government.

Example:
T. A. Gardner said:
I really don't care about sex scandals in general. I might comment once or twice on one but that's generally it. Epstein is a nothing burger to me and the latest of many such nothing burgers.
Click to expand...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top