New batch of Epstein files show Todd Blanche is lying...

QP!

QP!

Verified User
Todd Blanche did a Press conference (time stamped video below) where he basically claimed the DOJ has zero evidence that there were any co conspirators (men) in the Epstein case. Basically saying, if you draw the conclusion that Epstein trafficed hundreds of women to himself.

The problem for Blanche is here are just a sampling of documents that came out from the Epstein files...

aja7r5.jpg



Here is a discussion between DoJ officials years ago, during an investigation naming (now redacted) men, they saw as co conspirators.

aja7us.jpg


aja7x8.jpg





So why is Trump's DOJ redacting these names when the new law by Congress specifically says it is illegal to do so?

@FastLane @Damocles @T. A. Gardner , etc... how would you defend the above or suggest this is something to be ignored or not worth comment?
 
QP! said:
Todd Blanche did a Press conference (time stamped video below) where he basically claimed the DOJ has zero evidence that there were any co conspirators (men) in the Epstein case. Basically saying, if you draw the conclusion that Epstein trafficed hundreds of women to himself.

The problem for Blanche is here are just a sampling of documents that came out from the Epstein files...

aja7r5.jpg



Here is a discussion between DoJ officials years ago, during an investigation naming (now redacted) men, they saw as co conspirators.

aja7us.jpg


aja7x8.jpg





So why is Trump's DOJ redacting these names when the new law by Congress specifically says it is illegal to do so?

@FastLane @Damocles @T. A. Gardner , etc... how would you defend the above or suggest this is something to be ignored or not worth comment?
Click to expand...
Now do all the other pages that weren't e-mail blasted into your inbox for talking points, fucktard.
You fucking mindless lemming.
Your shill check's getting cut off, bitch.
Democrats are going the way The Whigs did. You're fucked. I suggest you get a job.
 
Matt Dillon said:
So, did you have a point?
Who is Todd Blanche? :dunno:
There's some info there, but wtf does it pertain to?
Click to expand...
Todd Blanche was Trumps personal lawyer and is now #2 at the DoJ and you can see him CURRENTLY in interviews (see you tube video above) still saying there were no co conspirators in the Epstein files and that is why the DoJ is not investigating or pursuing charges against anyone.

That is clearly a lie, by Trumps Doj as clearly shown in the very documents that they were FORCED to release.

You can direct talk between FBI agents about conspirators with the names redacted to protect the men named.

That breaks the law as the Epstein Transparency Act law, Trump was FORCED to sign, said names of men could not be redacted to protect them.

So Trump and his DoJ are actively still trying to cover this up and refusing to name and prosecute conspirators.
 
QP! said:
Todd Blanche was Trumps personal lawyer and is now #2 at the DoJ and you can see him CURRENTLY in interviews (see you tube video above) still saying there were no co conspirators in the Epstein files and that is why the DoJ is not investigating or pursuing charges against anyone.

That is clearly a lie, by Trumps Doj as clearly shown in the very documents that they were FORCED to release.

You can direct talk between FBI agents about conspirators with the names redacted to protect the men named.

That breaks the law as the Epstein Transparency Act law, Trump was FORCED to sign, said names of men could not be redacted to protect them.

So Trump and his DoJ are actively still trying to cover this up and refusing to name and prosecute conspirators.
Click to expand...
Oh STFU crybaby. You ain't makin' no hay on this, and eat a dick, you miserable ballcheese nugget.
muellertrump-jpg.73258

You fucking retard. You have no idea wtf is actually going on, for real. :palm:
 
Last edited:
QP! said:
FYP above
Click to expand...
Trump wasn't any of that, you fuckin' retard. I know, it's hard to believe there's people different than what you're used to.
It's like that, though. :BKick:
You ain't no pillar of society, but Americans are. Trump's an American. Idk wtf you are.
Slimy cretin slug that needs salt thrown on it or something.
 
Matt Dillon said:
Trump wasn't any of that, you fuckin' retard. I know, it's hard to believe there's people different than what you're used to.
It's like that, though. :BKick:
You ain't no pillar of society, but Americans are. Trump's an American. Idk wtf you are.
Slimy cretin slug that needs salt thrown on it or something.
Click to expand...
Heh stupid.

That is Trump's current DoJ, refusing to comply with the law that was just forced on Trump that says the mens names cannot be redacted and protected and yet you see above the men are all redacted and protected by them.

It is Trumps current DoJ who is in the interview above saying the DoJ is not aware of any co conspirators and if they were they would be investigating and prosecuting them. He is saying this is a crime that only Epstein and Maxwell did and no one else participated.. He was crystal clear saying this is all just a myth that these co conspirators exist. And yet we have the emails between FBI agents (10 of them) who are discussing the names (redacted again) of the co conspirators they are investigating before someone at DoJ KILLED THAT INVESTIGATION.

Hey stupid., be less stupid. This is all on Trumps DoJ who can simply follow the law that was just passed and unredact and stop protecting the men.
 
Phantasmal said:
Not all of them. They have retained the most damaging. They need to release the videos and photos, not to the public, but to Congress where the committee can determine who will review the child abuse.
Click to expand...
And the NEW LAW explicitly was written to demand that the names of the men COULD NOT be redacted, and only the women victim could.

and yet Trumps DoJ is redacting those names you see above.
 
QP! said:
Todd Blanche did a Press conference (time stamped video below) where he basically claimed the DOJ has zero evidence that there were any co conspirators (men) in the Epstein case. Basically saying, if you draw the conclusion that Epstein trafficed hundreds of women to himself.

The problem for Blanche is here are just a sampling of documents that came out from the Epstein files...

aja7r5.jpg



Here is a discussion between DoJ officials years ago, during an investigation naming (now redacted) men, they saw as co conspirators.

aja7us.jpg


aja7x8.jpg





So why is Trump's DOJ redacting these names when the new law by Congress specifically says it is illegal to do so?

@FastLane @Damocles @T. A. Gardner , etc... how would you defend the above or suggest this is something to be ignored or not worth comment?
Click to expand...
It used to mean something when a public official lied, and lying repeatedly resulted in consequences, but the era of Trump, lying and dishonesty is valued, often rewarded, it would be a bigger accomplishment finding one of them actually telling the truth
 
Phantasmal said:
Precisely!
Click to expand...
@Matt Dillon does not give a crap about any of this since Trump is implicated and the one covering it up. So pedophilia and grooming no longer matter.


----------
Cite

The Epstein Files Transparency Act (H.R. 4405, 2025) prohibits redacting the names of public figures (including men named in the files) except under specific exemptions (such as victim privacy or active investigations). Below are the exact operative passages from the enrolled bill text.



1. Prohibition on redacting due to embarrassment or political sensitivity​


This is the key section often cited:


“No record shall be withheld, delayed, or redacted on the basis of embarrassment, reputational harm, or political sensitivity, including to any government official, public figure, or foreign dignitary.”
Click to expand...

This clause is what prevents agencies from redacting names merely because the individuals involved might be prominent or politically sensitive.



2. Requirement to produce an unredacted list of named officials / politically exposed persons​


Another important requirement:


The Attorney General must provide to Congress
“a list of all government officials and politically exposed persons named or referenced in the released materials, with no redactions permitted…”
Click to expand...

This provision directly mandates an unredacted list of named officials or politically exposed individuals.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top