NASA - Earth has been in COOLING TREND for last 6,000 years

PostmodernProphet said:
if there is one thing that everyone except you can agree on it is that, apart from people, there are no flora or fauna capable of having an opinion about the human species.......
Click to expand...

Dumbass horseshit. A great many of them find us tasty.


Haw, haw......................................haw.

You can fuck off now.
 
Scum of the Revolution
giphy.gif


STFU you pos bigot
Click to expand...

Such wit.



Haw, haw..................................haw.
 
PostmodernProphet said:
that instinctive behavior proves they are twice as intelligent as you are......
Click to expand...

Post after post insulting and name-calling without a trace of input.WOW. Global warming is a fact . https://climate.nasa.gov/evidence/ The options are simple. Deal with it seriously, and if it is real, we can save the planet. If it is not, but we cleaned up the planet, we will have cleaner air, land and water. The only mistake is saying you know it is not real and allow more pollution. That is a lose.
 
Nordberg said:
Post after post insulting and name-calling without a trace of input.WOW. Global warming is a fact . https://climate.nasa.gov/evidence/ The options are simple. Deal with it seriously, and if it is real, we can save the planet. If it is not, but we cleaned up the planet, we will have cleaner air, land and water. The only mistake is saying you know it is not real and allow more pollution. That is a lose.
Click to expand...

dude, don't expect anything different.....I can't imagine any post of yours that would merit any real consideration.....that being said, everyone knows global warming was real.....the stupidity came in thinking we caused it or could change it.......its a cycle.......the core sample graph that proves it has already been posted here......the science shows that this cycle isn't even as bad as those that happened before humans even created carbon emissions....this argument has been repeated and you idiots have been proven to be idiots so many times in the last dozen years that you ought to be embarrassed just to be seen in this thread......
 
They actually LIKE filth and wallowing in poison. It's a troll thang.



Haw, haw................................haw.
 
Bigdog said:
"scientists say Earth’s current orbital positions within the Milankovitch cycles predict our planet should be cooling, not warming, continuing a long-term cooling trend that began 6,000 years ago."

https://climate.nasa.gov/blog/2949/...l-cycles-cant-explain-earths-current-warming/

The Earth's orbit is sending us hurtling towards a new Ice Age. And there is nothing humans can do to stop it.
Click to expand...

For missing the point, this thread takes the cake. Here is the theme of the article printed there in boldface:

Regarding the "cycles": "they cannot account for the current period of rapid warming Earth has experienced since the pre-Industrial period (the period between 1850 and 1900), and particularly since the mid-20th Century. Scientists are confident Earth’s recent warming is primarily due to human activities — specifically, the direct input of carbon dioxide into Earth’s atmosphere from burning fossil fuels."
 
martin said:
For missing the point, this thread takes the cake. Here is the theme of the article printed there in boldface:

Regarding the "cycles": "they cannot account for the current period of rapid warming Earth has experienced since the pre-Industrial period (the period between 1850 and 1900), and particularly since the mid-20th Century. Scientists are confident Earth’s recent warming is primarily due to human activities — specifically, the direct input of carbon dioxide into Earth’s atmosphere from burning fossil fuels."
Click to expand...

09072020003.jpg
 
PostmodernProphet said:
dude, don't expect anything different.....I can't imagine any post of yours that would merit any real consideration.....that being said, everyone knows global warming was real.....the stupidity came in thinking we caused it or could change it.......its a cycle.......the core sample graph that proves it has already been posted here......the science shows that this cycle isn't even as bad as those that happened before humans even created carbon emissions....this argument has been repeated and you idiots have been proven to be idiots so many times in the last dozen years that you ought to be embarrassed just to be seen in this thread......
Click to expand...

It’s undeniably a cycle.

The earth has periods of ice ages/warming and they’re not even sure why. So how can it be ‘a fact’ that AWG is true? It’s a hypothesis that’s kept afloat with funding by ideologues.

Even if AWG is an actual thing, the real apocalyptic disaster would be an ice age and AGW could help mitigate the next one.
 
martin said:
For missing the point, this thread takes the cake. Here is the theme of the article printed there in boldface:

Regarding the "cycles": "they cannot account for the current period of rapid warming Earth has experienced since the pre-Industrial period (the period between 1850 and 1900), and particularly since the mid-20th Century. Scientists are confident Earth’s recent warming is primarily due to human activities — specifically, the direct input of carbon dioxide into Earth’s atmosphere from burning fossil fuels."
Click to expand...

Milankovitch cycles predict glaciation cycles (ice ages) every 41k years. Yet the data for the last million years shows 100k year cycle "trend". The Milankovitch cycles no longer apply, and can not be used to predict the Earth "should" be 2 degrees cooler.

Follow the science. :palm:
 
Last edited:
Primavera said:
The warming on the Antarctic Peninsular is largely attributable to vulcanism under the mantle!!

https://www.iceagenow.info/nasa-supervolcano-may-melting-antarctic-ice-sheet/
Click to expand...

Yep. The anti science Leftists censor this fact from your link ...

" A new NASA study adds evidence that a geothermal heat source called a mantle plume lies deep below Antarctica’s Marie Byrd Land, explaining some of the melting that creates lakes and rivers under the ice sheet. Although the heat source isn’t a new or increasing threat to the West Antarctic ice sheet, it may help explain why the ice sheet collapsed rapidly in an earlier era of rapid climate change, and why it is so unstable today.

The stability of an ice sheet is closely related to how much water lubricates it from below, allowing glaciers to slide more easily. Understanding the sources and future of the meltwater under West Antarctica is important for estimating the rate at which ice may be lost to the ocean in the future."
 
Bigdog said:
"scientists say Earth’s current orbital positions within the Milankovitch cycles predict our planet should be cooling, not warming, continuing a long-term cooling trend that began 6,000 years ago."

https://climate.nasa.gov/blog/2949/...l-cycles-cant-explain-earths-current-warming/

The Earth's orbit is sending us hurtling towards a new Ice Age. And there is nothing humans can do to stop it.
Click to expand...




That's a cycle it does not affect the climate change trends which are different and worsening. the glacial ice cycle whatever it's called is operating off a base line, humans fucking with the climate changes that base line.
 
Darth Omar said:
It’s undeniably a cycle.

The earth has periods of ice ages/warming and they’re not even sure why. So how can it be ‘a fact’ that AWG is true? It’s a hypothesis that’s kept afloat with funding by ideologues.

Even if AWG is an actual thing, the real apocalyptic disaster would be an ice age and AGW could help mitigate the next one.
Click to expand...

Yep. :thup:

Why the Leftists wish we were back in the Little Ice Age, I have no idea. Maybe a White lib can speak to this.
 
Turgid Member said:
That's a cycle it does not affect the climate change trends which are different and worsening. the glacial ice cycle whatever it's called is operating off a base line, humans fucking with the climate changes that base line.
Click to expand...

Base line? ... the Vostok Ice core data shows approximately 20 degree F swings in temp the last 400k years. What is the "base line"?

And Where do you think all the carbon in the ground came from, and how did it get there?
 
Primavera said:
.
Here is a paper from that well known right wing blog aka Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics.

Decadal and multidecadal natural variability in European temperature

Abstract
European monthly temperatures undergo strong fluctuations from one year to the other. The variability is controlled by natural processes such as Atlantic cycles, changes in solar activity, volcanic eruptions, unforced internal atmospheric variability, as well as anthropogenic factors. This contribution investigates the role of key natural drivers for European temperature variability, namely the Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation (AMO), the North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO) and solar activity changes. We calculated Pearson correlation coefficients r for AMO, NAO and sunspots compared to monthly temperature data of 39 European countries for the period 1901–2015 in order to search for ‘fingerprints’ of the natural drivers. A cross correlation window of 11 months was chosen for AMO, NAO and of 120 months for SILSO to account for possible time lags or phase shifts. The r coefficients were mapped out across Europe on a monthly basis to document regional and seasonal changes of the correlation strength. The NAO dominates European temperature variability during the winter months, with strongest relationship in February. The AMO modulates temperatures in March to November, with best correlations occurring in summer, but also in April. Regions of strongest AMO and NAO impacts shift across the continent from month to month, forming systematic patterns. Direct correlation of the solar 11-year Schwabe cycle with temperatures was identified only in some countries in certain multidecadal intervals during February, March, June and September. Previous studies have suggested a significant solar influence on the AMO and NAO. It is likely that the greatest impact of solar activity on European temperatures is of a non-linear, indirect nature by way of interaction with Atlantic cycles.


https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1364682620301115
Click to expand...

.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top