Mr. President, I read the polls. Democrats don’t want you to run again.

Absolute bullshit.

Senator Rick Scott wants to "sunset" Social Security and Medicare

By now, many listeners have probably seen Senator Rick Scott (R. Florida) on television trying to deny what is in his infamous 11-point plan to “rescue America.” One example that he tries to deny is in the section on government. Buried on page 19 of the 31-page pdf of the plan is a very significant promise.

[I believe it is worth the time and perhaps waves of disgust that will accompany this reading –Check out the 31-page power point of Scott’s alleged “rescue plan.” You can access it here. To read the plan, itself, click on the TV screen and the entire sent of pdf pages will show up.]
Here is the language from page 19: “All federal legislation sunsets in 5 years. If a law is worth keeping, Congress can pass it again.” [There are a number of promised changes on that page all under the rubric of “Government” but this one is quite a doozey!]

Now among the many federal laws on the books is a law called the Social Security Act. This law was originally passed in 1935 to create Unemployment Insurance, Aid to Dependent Children (cash welfare for widows and orphans --- later extended to cover all poor single women with children renamed Aid to Families with Dependent Children [AFDC]), and Old Age and Survivors Pensions (what is commonly thought of today as “Social Security.”). Since then, the law has been amended many times and expanded dramatically.

Here is a link to the current Table of Contents of the law: . The law currently has twenty-one titles --- and under each title are many sections. (I have actually tried to find out how many pages are in the now expanded Social Security Act but could not.

I would venture to guess it might be in the thousands!). Included in the current law is an entire section covering Medicare which is administered by the Social Security Administration. (Medicare was passed as an amendment to the Social Security Act in 1965.)

So --- if Scott actually understood his own proposal, the entire Social Security Act --- including Medicare and the Social Security Pensions almost all Americans over 70 are receiving monthly --- would either disappear (that’s what “sunsetting” means, by the way) or have to be re-enacted by Congress.

So naturally, a reporter asked Scott how he could justify “sunsetting” Medicare and Social Security pensions: programs that are wildly popular and have been in existence for decades. Scott dismissed that concern as “Democrat Talking Points.” The reporter retorted, with a tone of exasperation in his voice “No! It’s in your plan.”

https://www.wamc.org/commentary-opi...-wants-to-sunset-social-security-and-medicare

FVV31zTVsAIonFW.jpg

 
Senator Rick Scott wants to "sunset" Social Security and Medicare

By now, many listeners have probably seen Senator Rick Scott (R. Florida) on television trying to deny what is in his infamous 11-point plan to “rescue America.” One example that he tries to deny is in the section on government. Buried on page 19 of the 31-page pdf of the plan is a very significant promise.

[I believe it is worth the time and perhaps waves of disgust that will accompany this reading –Check out the 31-page power point of Scott’s alleged “rescue plan.” You can access it here. To read the plan, itself, click on the TV screen and the entire sent of pdf pages will show up.]
Here is the language from page 19: “All federal legislation sunsets in 5 years. If a law is worth keeping, Congress can pass it again.” [There are a number of promised changes on that page all under the rubric of “Government” but this one is quite a doozey!]

Now among the many federal laws on the books is a law called the Social Security Act. This law was originally passed in 1935 to create Unemployment Insurance, Aid to Dependent Children (cash welfare for widows and orphans --- later extended to cover all poor single women with children renamed Aid to Families with Dependent Children [AFDC]), and Old Age and Survivors Pensions (what is commonly thought of today as “Social Security.”). Since then, the law has been amended many times and expanded dramatically.

Here is a link to the current Table of Contents of the law: . The law currently has twenty-one titles --- and under each title are many sections. (I have actually tried to find out how many pages are in the now expanded Social Security Act but could not.

I would venture to guess it might be in the thousands!). Included in the current law is an entire section covering Medicare which is administered by the Social Security Administration. (Medicare was passed as an amendment to the Social Security Act in 1965.)

So --- if Scott actually understood his own proposal, the entire Social Security Act --- including Medicare and the Social Security Pensions almost all Americans over 70 are receiving monthly --- would either disappear (that’s what “sunsetting” means, by the way) or have to be re-enacted by Congress.

So naturally, a reporter asked Scott how he could justify “sunsetting” Medicare and Social Security pensions: programs that are wildly popular and have been in existence for decades. Scott dismissed that concern as “Democrat Talking Points.” The reporter retorted, with a tone of exasperation in his voice “No! It’s in your plan.”

https://www.wamc.org/commentary-opi...-wants-to-sunset-social-security-and-medicare

FVV31zTVsAIonFW.jpg


Are you so thick you think any of this will pass?
 
They are threatening to cut Medicare and SS.

They SHOULD cut a lot of the SS disability bullshit. If someone has a legit problem then we should help them. Some 22 year old that says he needs disability because he drinks too much and does drugs? Fuck him. Work or starve.
 
They SHOULD cut a lot of the SS disability bullshit. If someone has a legit problem then we should help them. Some 22 year old that says he needs disability because he drinks too much and does drugs? Fuck him. Work or starve.

They don't give SS benefits to drunks and drug addicts.
 
Or some 25 year old claiming he has PTSD because someone hollered at him a little at his job he was at for 2 weeks and expected him to actually work so now he deserves SS disability. :laugh: WORK, STFU, and pay your own way.No more free rides for SLUGS.
 
Or some 25 year old claiming he has PTSD because someone hollered at him a little at his job he was at for 2 weeks and expected him to actually work so now he deserves SS disability. :laugh: WORK, STFU, and pay your own way.No more free rides for SLUGS.

The SSA is not dumb.
 
They don't give SS benefits to drunks and drug addicts.

Pretty sure they do. They just find corrupt doctors who basically work for SS lawyers and they will say whatever the lawyer wants them to say. Call it PTSD or Bi polar, or whatever other bullshit disorder they dream up. The REAL disorder is fucking laziness. :laugh:
 
Pretty sure they do. They just find corrupt doctors who basically work for SS lawyers and they will say whatever the lawyer wants them to say. Call it PTSD or Bi polar, or whatever other bullshit disorder they dream up. The REAL disorder is fucking laziness. :laugh:

No they have to go to THEIR official doctors. They have to prove what they have. X-Rays, whatever to show for it.
 
And its about damn time the poor start paying some taxes too. That way they can feel like they are part of America with some skin in the game instead of just taking. TAX THE POOR!.....That will motivate them to earn more money instead of just limping and gimping it along. :laugh:
 

However, if you are still drinking, and the SSA believes that if you stopped drinking your medical conditions would improve to the point where you would not be disabled, you won't get disability benefits.

Interesting and thank you for that. So basically if your medical conditions get complicated along with chronic drinking, you might be qualified. Otherwise,no dice.
 
Good question. Probably why the party has started now with this talk because you have to think the preference is for him to step aside (stating the obvious) as opposed to have someone try and primary him.

Stepping aside is the best strategy although it is like saying "we made a mistake" by nominating him in 2020.
 
They are threatening to cut Medicare and SS.

Some action has to be taken soon because they won't have enough funds to pay all benefits. Raising taxes is not a popular solution and many benefits could be cut with no harm to anybody (those making over $500,000 per year, etc.).
 
Back
Top