Most comprehensive gun limits in US!!!

Connecticut lawmakers reach deal on 'most comprehensive' gun limits in US

http://usnews.nbcnews.com/_news/201...-on-most-comprehensive-gun-limits-in-us?lite&


TheVictims_courantpageBlack2.jpg

i mistrust legislation based on emotion

how about cleaning up the process of putting people (especially the mentally ill) on the do not sell list and requiring background checks for not only all firearms, but also ammunition and clips

also, there needs to be a way to get off of the do not sell list if an error is made
 
Rana that is hilarious. I think the righties here piss their pants if SF looks at them sideways. They're terrified of him! And they call themselves men. We're just girls and we take him on every day. That boy gives me the side eye and next thing you know he is limping out of here like a one-legged man who just left an ass-kicking contest! And I know it is the same for you. Really, these righty big mouths are just sad, afraid of their own people...

Enjoy your fantasy. I have not seen or read any member here that is to be feared .
What is a righty?
 
i mistrust legislation based on emotion

how about cleaning up the process of putting people on the do not sell list and requiring background check for not only all firearms, but also ammunition and clips

How about restricting crazy people's ability to own guns. How about a database that keeps track of crazy people and attempts to limit "their" access to guns ? While doing so not try to deny any law abiding citizen's right to be armed..
 
How about restricting crazy people's ability to own guns. How about a database that keeps track of crazy people and attempts to limit "their" access to guns ? While doing so not try to deny any law abiding citizen's right to be armed..

Nobody's saing yhat's a bad idea. Especially if it applies to Wayne LaPierre.
 
How about restricting crazy people's ability to own guns. How about a database that keeps track of crazy people and attempts to limit "their" access to guns ? While doing so not try to deny any law abiding citizen's right to be armed..

that is one of the purposes of the do not sell list along with felons and terrorists...

how long do you think it takes to run a background check when the list is computerized?
 
that is one of the purposes of the do not sell list along with felons and terrorists...

how long do you think it takes to run a background check when the list is computerized?

The list with the 7yo child who isn't allowed to fly? People should have their rights restricted based on literally NOTHING?
 
The list with the 7yo child who isn't allowed to fly? People should have their rights restricted based on literally NOTHING?

so you are ok with anyone having a nuclear bomb or poison gas

or a mentally ill person with a firearm or a felon with a history of violence

if you want personal freedom, go buy an island somewhere and live by yourself
 
what would you consider to be more substantive changes?
Gun restrictions. Sales and ownership. But that would require a constitutional amendment, which nobody has the moral fortitude to even propose. So they'll dance around and nothing will happen. You can rest easy STY nobody's coming for your guns.

This country is really strange.
 
so you are ok with anyone having a nuclear bomb or poison gas

or a mentally ill person with a firearm or a felon with a history of violence

if you want personal freedom, go buy an island somewhere and live by yourself

So you don't believe in due process of law and think it's ok to deny people their birth rights based on absolutely nothing. No wonder you support a king tyrant.
 
so you are ok with anyone having a nuclear bomb or poison gas

or a mentally ill person with a firearm or a felon with a history of violence

if you want personal freedom, go buy an island somewhere and live by yourself

You couldn't own a nuke if it were legal. It would kill you

Define mentally ill

Define history of violence
 
that is one of the purposes of the do not sell list along with felons and terrorists...

how long do you think it takes to run a background check when the list is computerized?

About as long as any computerized crap that is still handled by humans? Ever have a computer screw something up fur you? Where does your faith in computers and gubmint come from?
 
So you don't believe in due process of law and think it's ok to deny people their birth rights based on absolutely nothing. No wonder you support a king tyrant.

a convicted felon has no rights to a firearm so how can you say no due process?

as for supporting obama, i preferred him to rummy, but he does not have my unconditional support...no politician does

also, if 'king tyrant' is so powerful, then how come he is at odds with the repugs and some dims in congress?
 
a convicted felon has no rights to a firearm so how can you say no due process?

as for supporting obama, i preferred him to rummy, but he does not have my unconditional support...no politician does

also, if 'king tyrant' is so powerful, then how come he is at odds with the repugs and some dims in congress?

You just said you wanted the "terrorist watch list" to be a do not sell list. That list is NOT due process of law, has no oversight and in many cases no evidence. Also I never said Obama, you have repeatitly stated you wanted a monarchy. That is what I was referring to.
 
Rana that is hilarious. I think the righties here piss their pants if SF looks at them sideways. They're terrified of him! And they call themselves men. We're just girls and we take him on every day. That boy gives me the side eye and next thing you know he is limping out of here like a one-legged man who just left an ass-kicking contest! And I know it is the same for you. Really, these righty big mouths are just sad, afraid of their own people...

You think alot of stupid things and have an over inflated view of yourself. I have met twats like you in the work force. You prance around the work place like some modern day Gloria Steinem. Hell you probably brag at work about your self professed JPP "accomplishments" and everyone you work with feels sorry for you and laughs at you behind your back
 
You just said you wanted the "terrorist watch list" to be a do not sell list. That list is NOT due process of law, has no oversight and in many cases no evidence. Also I never said Obama, you have repeatitly stated you wanted a monarchy. That is what I was referring to.

i included the terrorist watch list as a part of the do not sell list and tend to agree with you about it, but we are stuck with it for now

as for the monarchy, i support a constitutional monarchy with the monarch elected at the end of the previous monarch's life and the monarchs sole function is to veto legislation that he/she disagrees with...a bit different from 'king tyrant'
 
Back
Top