Mosque being built at Ground zero

[Sammy Jankis]

Again, "usually due to reasons not the religion"...

In this case they already have the permits. If they take them away because of the religion it will be unconstitutional government intervention in a religion. So their goal is to end-run it by making a nearby building an historical landmark. It is my opinion that we shouldn't do an end-run on the constitution, instead we should attack it head on through protest.

I think they can just take it away because it's a terrorist organization as well.

The legalistic approach has a greater chance of working, that';s why your against it.

Collecting in the streets so the fascists can get snapshots of the faces of all the troublemakers is a bad idea.

 

[Damocles]

Translation:

I am a weak-ass america hating noahide fascist hung up on legalistic arguments pretending to be a patriot. I know my veneer of patriotism is weakening because now all i have are ad hominem attacks.

/Translation.

LOL...

Translation:

I, Asshat, can't even come up with an original way to try to continue ad-homs. I've lost and I know it. I know he didn't solely ad-hom me, he actually pwned. And boy do I like my AssHatBehind-Flavored Shake!

 

[Damocles]

I think they can just take it away because it's a terrorist organization as well.

The legalistic approach has a greater chance of working, that';s why your against it.

Collecting in the streets so the fascists can get snapshots of the faces of all the troublemakers is a bad idea.

Translation:

I am so afraid, that I won't even back up what I believe by action, I am desperate to undermine limitations on the government and sell my freedoms so that I can feel a bit more secure!

/Translation

Your opinions suck on this matter, anybody willing to tear up the constitution because they are afraid is willing to promote tyranny so long as the totalitarianism is in their favor.

 

[Sammy Jankis]

Translation:

I am so afraid, that I won't even back up what I believe by action, I am desperate to undermine limitations on the government and sell my freedoms so that I can feel a bit more secure!

/Translation

Your opinions suck on this matter, anybody willing to tear up the constitution because they are afraid is willing to promote tyranny so long as the totalitarianism is in their favor.

Collecting in mobs does nothing. Legal actions are better.

Your opinion blows chunks. The community has some say in what goes on. It;s not tearing up the constitution.

 

[Damocles]

Collecting in mobs does nothing. Legal actions are better.

Your opinion blows chunks. The community has some say in what goes on. It;s not tearing up the constitution.

It is if you enact law against a religion because it is one that AHZ, or even a whole grip of like-minded people, doesn't like.

You are a weak man who rejects the constitution and wants a totalitarian government made in his image, one that would make "suspicious" religions illegal.

I can't imagine what it would be like to live in a nation made in your image, but there is one thing that I know. We wouldn't be free.

Franklin was right.

 

[Sammy Jankis]

It is if you enact law against a religion because it is one that AHZ, or even a whole grip of like-minded people, doesn't like.

You are a weak man who rejects the constitution and wants a totalitarian government made in his image, one that would make "suspicious" religions illegal.

I can't imagine what it would be like to live in a nation made in your image, but there is one thing that I know. We wouldn't be free.

The granting of permits and communal contribution to that process is not a law against religion.

A nation in my image will be free of noahide theocratic tyranny. Stick around. You'll like it.

 

[Damocles]

The granting of permits and communal contribution to that process is not a law against religion.

A nation in my image will be free of noahide theocratic tyranny. Stick around. You'll like it.

Again, the permits are already granted. And denying permits based on the religion would be an unconstitutional use of government. A nation in your image would be a totalitarian state with people of certain religions hiding in an attempt to protect themselves from your jack-booted thugs.

 

[Sammy Jankis]

Again, the permits are already granted. And denying permits based on the religion would be an unconstitutional use of government. A nation in your image would be a totalitarian state with people of certain religions hiding in an attempt to protect themselves from your jack-booted thugs.

Again. Surely they can be revoked in light of new community disapproval. things can be undone. And im certain an argument can be made that a religion that is also a terrorist oganization should lose it's rights as a protected religion.

Totalitarain state lol. your defense of sharia is closer to that. you're way off base, a silly globalist masonic clown puking nonsense to amuse us all.

 

[Cancel 2018. 3]

Again. Surely they can be revoked in light of new community disapproval. things can be undone. And im certain an argument can be made that a religion that is also a terrorist oganization should lose it's rights as a protected religion.

Totalitarain state lol. your defense of sharia is closer to that. you're way off base, a silly globalist masonic clown puking nonsense to amuse us all.

the entire islamic religion is a terrorist organization?

 

[Mott the Hoople]

But currently, the greatest fear is totalitarianism from islam.

You jews are the inventors of racist nationalism.

Israel is an apartheid state similar to S. africa.

But all Nationalism is not racist. Nationalism just means a government functions to improve the lives of a majority of citizenry through sensible policy. Think of it as the opposite of the globalist anti-national belief that the state functions merely to subjugate the needs of the population to the desires of internationalist fascist multinational corporation and bankers.

No, I fear the totalitarianism that results from scared people like you over reacting. Drunk drivers kill way more people in this nation each year then Islamic terrorist do. Are you afraid to drive too?

 

[Timshel]

No, I fear the totalitarianism that results from scared people like you over reacting. Drunk drivers kill way more people in this nation each year then Islamic terrorist do. Are you afraid to drive too?

Yeah, drunk illegal immigrants sent here by the Jews to kill white people.

/nAHZi

 

[Mott the Hoople]

Yeah, drunk illegal immigrants sent here by the Jews to kill white people.

/nAHZi

Except in Miami where the reverse is true.

 

[Sammy Jankis]

No, I fear the totalitarianism that results from scared people like you over reacting. Drunk drivers kill way more people in this nation each year then Islamic terrorist do. Are you afraid to drive too?

Wait until a greater number of jihadists gets in and feels emboldened, because of morons like you and damo who think protecting religions means protecting violent theocrats.

It's not totalitarianism to disallow a mosque building in a highly symbolic area.

don't be so scared, sissy.

 

[Timshel]

Retard, you are the one pissing your pants because you think this will embolden the extremists (which in your view is really just all of them).

 

[Sammy Jankis]

Yeah, drunk illegal immigrants sent here by the Jews to kill white people.

/nAHZi

Jews like illegal immigration because it lowers wages for the people, giving them less ability to resist Olam ha ba. Plus they want to dilute the number of educated patriots with more uneducated desperate people with no notion of american freedoms.

contrary to popular disinformation, judaism does advocate theocracy.

 

[Damocles]

Again. Surely they can be revoked in light of new community disapproval. things can be undone. And im certain an argument can be made that a religion that is also a terrorist oganization should lose it's rights as a protected religion.

Totalitarain state lol. your defense of sharia is closer to that. you're way off base, a silly globalist masonic clown puking nonsense to amuse us all.

Tyranny of the majority is not an excuse to throw away the constitution.

 

[Damocles]

Retard, you are the one pissing your pants because you think this will embolden the extremists (which in your view is really just all of them).

Not a surprise, he has made not even one effort to deny that. He insists the entire religion is radicalized and should be outlawed.

 

[Sammy Jankis]

Tyranny of the majority is not an excuse to throw away the constitution.

LOL. You're a joke. Nobody's throwing away the constitution. Get your panties ungunched, retard.

 

[Topspin]

so why no outcry that christianity was a terrorist org when Mcviegh did his deed assclown?

 

[Sammy Jankis]

so why no outcry that christianity was a terrorist org when Mcviegh did his deed assclown?

Because his violent beliefs did not come from christianity? maybe?