http://m.palmbeachpost.com/news/new...arijuana-case-clashing-values-and-part/nbmzd/
Keep pot illegal, say Conservatives!
Keep pot illegal, say Conservatives!
More Republicans against freedom!
- Thread starter Jarod
- Start date
StormX
Banned
Liberals love to confuse the voters and not play by the rules....
Florida legislative leaders have formally joined Attorney General Pam Bondi’s attempt to block a medical-marijuana constitutional amendment from reaching the ballot in November 2014.
In a brief filed Friday in the Florida Supreme Court, House General Counsel Daniel Nordby and Senate General Counsel George Levesque argued that the ballot title and summary for the proposed amendment are misleading and use inaccurate rhetoric in a number of areas to obscure the “true purpose” of the ballot initiative.
The brief doesn’t contest the policy expressed in the proposed amendment.
The proposal is heavily backed by Orlando trial lawyer and Democratic donor John Morgan, whose firm employs recently announced gubernatorial candidate Charlie Crist.
In the 50-page brief, Nordby and Levesque contend that while the title refers to use of marijuana for “certain medical conditions,” and the summary refers to “debilitating diseases,” the amendment instead provides an “open-ended authorization” for physicians when recommending marijuana use.
Also, they argue that the amendment violates the state constitution’s single-subject requirement by addressing three “logically-separable” subjects:
http://www.bizjournals.com/jacksonv.../2013/11/florida-house-senate-file-brief.html
Florida legislative leaders have formally joined Attorney General Pam Bondi’s attempt to block a medical-marijuana constitutional amendment from reaching the ballot in November 2014.
In a brief filed Friday in the Florida Supreme Court, House General Counsel Daniel Nordby and Senate General Counsel George Levesque argued that the ballot title and summary for the proposed amendment are misleading and use inaccurate rhetoric in a number of areas to obscure the “true purpose” of the ballot initiative.
The brief doesn’t contest the policy expressed in the proposed amendment.
The proposal is heavily backed by Orlando trial lawyer and Democratic donor John Morgan, whose firm employs recently announced gubernatorial candidate Charlie Crist.
In the 50-page brief, Nordby and Levesque contend that while the title refers to use of marijuana for “certain medical conditions,” and the summary refers to “debilitating diseases,” the amendment instead provides an “open-ended authorization” for physicians when recommending marijuana use.
Also, they argue that the amendment violates the state constitution’s single-subject requirement by addressing three “logically-separable” subjects:
- Removal of criminal liability and civil sanctions on individuals, caregivers and physicians.
- Exemption from civil liability for “others” related to the use of marijuana for medical purposes.
- Creation of a new regulatory structure to promote the use of medical marijuana.
http://www.bizjournals.com/jacksonv.../2013/11/florida-house-senate-file-brief.html
evince
Truthmatters
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Florida_Central_Voter_File
Florida Central Voter File
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
The Florida Central Voter File was an internal list of legally eligible voters used by the US Florida Department of State Division of Elections to monitor the official voter lists maintained by the 67 county governments in the State of Florida between 1998 and January 1, 2006. The exclusion of eligible voters from the file was a central part of the controversy surrounding the US presidential elections in 2000, which hinged on results in Florida. The 'Florida Central Voter File' was replaced by the Florida Voter Registration System on January 1, 2006 when a new federal law, the Help America Vote Act, came into effect.
Florida Central Voter File
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
The Florida Central Voter File was an internal list of legally eligible voters used by the US Florida Department of State Division of Elections to monitor the official voter lists maintained by the 67 county governments in the State of Florida between 1998 and January 1, 2006. The exclusion of eligible voters from the file was a central part of the controversy surrounding the US presidential elections in 2000, which hinged on results in Florida. The 'Florida Central Voter File' was replaced by the Florida Voter Registration System on January 1, 2006 when a new federal law, the Help America Vote Act, came into effect.
evince
Truthmatters
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Florida_Central_Voter_File#James_Lee.27s_testimony
James Lee's testimony[edit]
On 17 April 2001, James Lee testified, before the McKinney panel, that the state had given DBT the directive to add to the purge list people who matched at least 90% of a last name. DBT objected, knowing that this would produce a huge number of false positives (non-felons).[4]
Lee went on saying that the state then ordered DBT to shift to an even lower threshold of 80% match, allowing also names to be reversed (thus a person named Thomas Clarence could be taken to be the same as Clarence Thomas). Besides this, middle initials were skipped, Jr. and Sr. suffixes dropped, and some nicknames and aliases were added to puff up the list.
"DBT told state officials", testified Lee, "that the rules for creating the [purge] list would mean a significant number of people who were not deceased, not registered in more than one county, or not a felon, would be included on the list. DBT made suggestions to reduce the numbers of eligible voters included on the list". According to Lee, to this suggestion the state told the company, "Forget about it".
"The people who worked on this (for DBT) are very adamant... they told them what would happen", said Lee. "The state expected the county supervisors to be the failsafe." Lee said his company will never again get involved in cleansing voting rolls. "We are not confident any of the methods used today can guarantee legal voters will not be wrongfully denied the right to vote", Lee told a group of Atlanta-area black lawmakers in March 2001.[7]
James Lee's testimony[edit]
On 17 April 2001, James Lee testified, before the McKinney panel, that the state had given DBT the directive to add to the purge list people who matched at least 90% of a last name. DBT objected, knowing that this would produce a huge number of false positives (non-felons).[4]
Lee went on saying that the state then ordered DBT to shift to an even lower threshold of 80% match, allowing also names to be reversed (thus a person named Thomas Clarence could be taken to be the same as Clarence Thomas). Besides this, middle initials were skipped, Jr. and Sr. suffixes dropped, and some nicknames and aliases were added to puff up the list.
"DBT told state officials", testified Lee, "that the rules for creating the [purge] list would mean a significant number of people who were not deceased, not registered in more than one county, or not a felon, would be included on the list. DBT made suggestions to reduce the numbers of eligible voters included on the list". According to Lee, to this suggestion the state told the company, "Forget about it".
"The people who worked on this (for DBT) are very adamant... they told them what would happen", said Lee. "The state expected the county supervisors to be the failsafe." Lee said his company will never again get involved in cleansing voting rolls. "We are not confident any of the methods used today can guarantee legal voters will not be wrongfully denied the right to vote", Lee told a group of Atlanta-area black lawmakers in March 2001.[7]
Speaking of "daring", why won't you reveal which elected office you supposedly hold?
What other laws currently on the books do you disagree with, Counselor?
There are tons of them. Many of our laws limit individual freedom and liberty and wrongfully put power in the hands of Government or big business.
Name a couple. Don't be shy.
StormX
Banned
LOL
So democrats only come out to vote for pot laws? Things like tax increases, jobs, the economy are not too important for them, good to know...
signalmankenneth
Verified User
Republicans against servicemembers and veterans too!
SNAP Cuts Hit Veterans, Too, Just in Time for Vets Day Patriotic Platitudes
SNAP Cuts Hit Veterans, Too, Just in Time for Vets Day Patriotic Platitudes
Last edited:
Throw in evince and signalmankenneth, and you'd have a liberal gangbang!If Bush had legalized pot, the Dude would have sucked his dick.
SmarterthanYou
rebel
except for firearms laws. you like them even though they remove power from we the people.