What does "Mueller's investigators" mean to you yurtsie?
Actually I don't believe there was a USC baseball source. I think Cohen made it up.
Could you rephrase this into English yurtsie? Thanks in advance.
What is their identity or names?
How is that any different than USC source? They were identified as someone from the the sports department. And it was not Cohen, it was a news source.
Is there anything you're honest about?
Is there anything you don't twist beyond recognition? "COHEN SAID"
"Cohen said that during the time the report places him in Prague, he was actually with his son visiting USC and meeting with the baseball coach. A USC baseball source confirmed Tuesday night that Cohen and his son had visited USC on August 29[SUP]th[/SUP]."
You support outing Mueller's investigators just because you don't like what he's doing. I bet you supported Valerie Plame's outing and career destruction also.
Holy crap. It was in fact the news source who said it was confirmed. It wasn't just Cohen you dirty liar, the news source said a USC source confirmed what Cohen said.
How do you even know they are part of the investigation, let alone investigators? You don't because they are anonymous.
Why is it important you need the name of the USC source who confirmedwhat Cohen said, but you don't need the names of the sources for the OP?
Just how dumb are you anyway? Why are you equating a supposed trip to college with a confidential government investigation into wrongdoing?
When are the names of confidential government investigators ever given to the public on a regular basis? I'll tell you.... when they're leaked, like the scummy bush repubs did with Plame.
How do you know they are investigators? The article says the sources are familiar with the matter, it never claims they are confidential or investigators, you made that crap up.
Further, maybe the USC source wants to remain confidential or anonymous.
So, we have established that you are two faced. Demanding the USC source be named, but arguing the "people familiar with the matter" keep their identity unknown.
IOW, anonymous
A confidential source who is an investigator with the Mueller probe told me Mueller believes Trump is innocent of all allegations against him.
Now according to Christiecrite, my source is to be believed without question.
Case closed.
Comey can't confirm steele dosier.except parts of it
Good lord you should quit while you're ahead. Did you even read the McClatchey article in the OP?
"It’s unclear whether Mueller’s investigators..."
Let's see the article with this info.
I just wrote it. Do you need me to repost it?
You're dishonest. "A confidential source who is an investigator with the Mueller probe told me Mueller believes Trump is innocent of all allegations against him."
That is the extent of my article. Why don't you believe my source?
I don't believe 90% of the swill that comes from trump supporters and defenders, even joke comments like the above.
Sources: Mueller has evidence Cohen was in Prague in 2016, confirming part of dossier
... That is he title just saying sources
The Justice Department special counsel has evidence that Donald Trump’s personal lawyer and confidant, Michael Cohen, secretly made a late-summer trip to Prague during the 2016 presidential campaign, according to two sources ***familiar with the matter***.
.... Here they describe their sources
Peter Carr, a spokesman for Mueller’s office, declined comment.
And when they tried to get a source from someone *involved* in the investigation they would not comment.