Cancel 2018.2
Oh, hi
How is asking if you have the same concern for the OP, shit stirring? Fascinating you would consider that shit stirring, my hunch is you obviously don't.
More of the Dossier confirmed!
- Thread starter Jarod
- Start date
How is asking if you have the same concern for the OP, shit stirring? Fascinating you would consider that shit stirring, my hunch is you obviously don't.
I don't know what you mean by having the same concern for the OP. Spell it out if you want an answer.
Cancel 2018.2
Oh, hi
I guess you didn't read the OP. Why don't you read it and tell me if you have the same concern.
Cancel 2018.2
Oh, hi
Interesting that you thanked this post. Tell me Christiefan, what sources does the article use to support their claim?
It is interesting that you immediately believed the OP claim and article WITHOUT question.
Can't wait to hear your justification.
I read the OP several times and still don't know what you're talking about. Why are you afraid to explain yourself further?
I would certainly be more inclined to take the word of people who are involved in a formal investigation over hearsay.
You have one unnamed source claiming he was at USC. You have another unnamed so-called government source saying he was never in Prague, how does one prove a negative?
Why are Y O U so willing to believe Cohen when he has nothing to gain and everything to lose by being honest?
Cancel 2018.2
Oh, hi
The OP article uses unnamed sources and is hearsay. Yet you never demanded what you demanded of me. Instead you immediately trusted it and thanked Cypress' post.
Why did you not demand why the sources are unnamed and demand to know who the sources are for the OP?
Why did you not demand why the sources are unnamed and demand to know who the sources are for the OP?
Brainwashed?
It's interesting that even though I can't see the Titmouse's babblings (thank the gods), he seems compelled to respond to one of your posts with a multitude of others. Diarrhea of the Keyboard can be terminal. With any luck. lol
How dumb are you? We're talking about classified v. unclassified sources.
Cancel 2018.2
Oh, hi
Who are the two sources used by McClatchy? What are their names?
Cancel 2018.2
Oh, hi
Bump for Christiecrite who claims she can't remember this, and it was less than a week ago
Cancel 2018.2
Oh, hi
Bump for Christiecrite who claims she can't remember this
There were no anonymous sources yurtsie. The article clearly states they were Mueller's investigators, part of a confidential investigation. Are you whining because the names weren't printed?
How is a USC baseball source part of a confidential investigation?
hvilleherb
Verified User
Where's the pee tape?
In your porn collection?
Cancel 2018.2
Oh, hi
So no names were given, you don't know their identity and to you that means they are not anonymous...
Really, I mean really
Cancel 2018.2
Oh, hi
Christiecrites massive intellectually dishonest argument :
And that means something real, not just "Mr. X. says he was at USC."
No names were given for the OP, so we in fact have Mr. X says something and Christiecrite claims that is not anonymous and is "real"
And that means something real, not just "Mr. X. says he was at USC."
No names were given for the OP, so we in fact have Mr. X says something and Christiecrite claims that is not anonymous and is "real"
So no names were given, you don't know their identity and to you that means they are not anonymous...
Really, I mean really
What does "Mueller's investigators" mean to you yurtsie?
Actually I don't believe there was a USC baseball source. I think Cohen made it up.
Christiecrites massive intellectually dishonest argument :
And that means something real, not just "Mr. X. says he was at USC."
No names were given for the OP, so we in fact have Mr. X says something and Christiecrite claims that is not anonymous and is "real"
Could you rephrase this into English yurtsie? Thanks in advance.
