More of the Dossier confirmed!

So you lied about me and can't admit it. How is it an error to have a USC source claim he was at USC and how is it an error that it was a different Cohen?

You're spazzing out because you lied about me and I proved it.



Poor floridafool.

I never lied about you, I just accused you of printing very old bull shit. Obviously today in 2018 the information that the SC has, was not had in 2017 when that item was published. Its old and wrong news, cuntie.
 
I never lied about you, I just accused you of printing very old bull shit. Obviously today in 2018 the information that the SC has, was not had in 2017 when that item was published. Its old and wrong news, cutie.

Liar, you said used uncredible sources and that I LIED. Then you admit my sources are credible, thus I didn't lie, and then you moved the goal posts to it being a year ago.

You fucked up saying I lied. That is a fact jack.

And the fact a witness said he was at USC and a government source confirmed to CNN that it was a different Cohen hasn't changed.

Poor floridafool.
 
Liar, you said used uncredible sources and that I LIED. Then you admit my sources are credible, thus I didn't lie, and then you moved the goal posts to it being a year ago.

You fucked up saying I lied. That is a fact jack.

And the fact a witness said he was at USC and a government source confirmed to CNN that it was a different Cohen hasn't changed.


Poor floridafool.


Poor little baby got her feelings hurt, for once in her miserable, disease infested life, she didnt lie. But of course, she never said that what she was talking about was almost 1 1/2 years old. The SC has proof today, honey bun, of Cohens trip to Prague, confirmed by several sources. So I guess what was printed 1 1/2 years ago, dont matter any longer.
 
Poor little baby got her feelings hurt, for once in her miserable, disease infested life, she didnt lie. But of course, she never said that what she was talking about was almost 1 1/2 years old. The SC has proof today, honey bun, of Cohens trip to Prague, confirmed by several sources. So I guess what was printed 1 1/2 years ago, dont matter any longer.

Then why does the McClatchy story say it is unconfirmed? Funny what liberals consider proof these days.

Poor floridafool melting down because he got busted lying.

:rofl2:
 
Of course you will. He did not need it from germany. But that does not matter to you. You are a right wing Trumplestilskin that will likely never accept any evidence or statements that do not back Daffy.

His passport does not show he was in Germany in 2016, it shows that he only entered one Schengen Area nation in 2016; Italy, but it shows that he entered on July 9th and left on July 17th but the Steele dossier claims the Prague meeting occurred in August or the first week of September:

Upon entering the Schengen Area, visitors get a rectangular stamp with the date, a country code, their port of entry, and a symbol showing how they entered — such as an airplane or a train. In Cohen’s passport, that mark appears on page 17, with a date of July 9. The mark is too faint to be fully legible. The exit stamp, similar but with rounded edges, is also light, but the letters “cino” are legible, indicating he flew out of Leonardo da Vinci–Fiumicino Airport in Rome. That stamp is dated July 17.

https://www.buzzfeed.com/anthonycor...ssport-heres?utm_term=.mde32oaGqB#.nwN5bG8LRW

In pursuit of this aim, COHEN had met secretly with several Russian Presidential Administration (PA) Legal Department officials in an EU country in August 2016.

COHEN had been accompanied to Prague by 3 colleagues and the timing of the visit was either in the last week of August or the first week of September.


https://www.vox.com/2018/4/13/17236660/michael-cohen-prague-trump-steele-dossier

Thanks for playing you dumb bitch.
 
Poor little baby got her feelings hurt, for once in her miserable, disease infested life, she didnt lie. But of course, she never said that what she was talking about was almost 1 1/2 years old. The SC has proof today, honey bun, of Cohens trip to Prague, confirmed by several sources. So I guess what was printed 1 1/2 years ago, dont matter any longer.

Maybe he teleported there because his passport proves conclusively that he didn't enter any Schengen Area nation in August or September of 2016.
 
Yes I'll go with the incontrovertible fact that Cohen's passport proves conclusively that he was not in a Schengen country in August or September of 2016 when the Steele dossier claims the Prague meeting occurred.

Maybe he fucking teleported there eh?


You are an easy mark, but he won't be able to convince Mueller.
LOL
 
Maybe he teleported there because his passport proves conclusively that he didn't enter any Schengen Area nation in August or September of 2016.

Further complicating matters is the fact that there is no way to prove, just by looking at someone’s passport, that the person does not also have a second passport, with a different set of stamps. The State Department allows second passports in some circumstances, such as when a stamp from one country would prevent a traveler from entering another. Those records are not public, a State Department official said.
Cohen is a shady lawyer. His passport stamps prove nothing.
He is lying.
 
His passport does not show he was in Germany in 2016, it shows that he only entered one Schengen Area nation in 2016; Italy, but it shows that he entered on July 9th and left on July 17th but the Steele dossier claims the Prague meeting occurred in August or the first week of September:

Upon entering the Schengen Area, visitors get a rectangular stamp with the date, a country code, their port of entry, and a symbol showing how they entered — such as an airplane or a train. In Cohen’s passport, that mark appears on page 17, with a date of July 9. The mark is too faint to be fully legible. The exit stamp, similar but with rounded edges, is also light, but the letters “cino” are legible, indicating he flew out of Leonardo da Vinci–Fiumicino Airport in Rome. That stamp is dated July 17.

https://www.buzzfeed.com/anthonycor...ssport-heres?utm_term=.mde32oaGqB#.nwN5bG8LRW

In pursuit of this aim, COHEN had met secretly with several Russian Presidential Administration (PA) Legal Department officials in an EU country in August 2016.

COHEN had been accompanied to Prague by 3 colleagues and the timing of the visit was either in the last week of August or the first week of September.


https://www.vox.com/2018/4/13/17236660/michael-cohen-prague-trump-steele-dossier

Thanks for playing you dumb bitch.

A drive from Milan to Prague would take nine hours and would not show any passport stamps across the open borders .

Boston to Pittsburgh would be about the same drive.

Cohen's passport doesn't rule out anything.
 
Then why does the McClatchy story say it is unconfirmed? Funny what liberals consider proof these days.

Poor floridafool melting down because he got busted lying.

:rofl2:

Robert Mueller has evidence that Donald Trump’s personal lawyer Michael Cohen traveled to Prague in 2016, refuting Cohen’s claim that he never visited the Czech capital and bolstering the Christopher Steele intelligence dossier that first described the trip, McClatchy reported on Friday.

Investigators for Mueller, the special counsel in the Russia probe, have evidence Cohen entered the Czech Republic through Germany in late summer 2016, McClatchy reported, citing two unnamed sources.
 
Robert Mueller has evidence that Donald Trump’s personal lawyer Michael Cohen traveled to Prague in 2016, refuting Cohen’s claim that he never visited the Czech capital and bolstering the Christopher Steele intelligence dossier that first described the trip, McClatchy reported on Friday.

Investigators for Mueller, the special counsel in the Russia probe, have evidence Cohen entered the Czech Republic through Germany in late summer 2016, McClatchy reported, citing two unnamed sources.

Why do you believe those unnamed sources over the USC source or Jake Tappers source?

Not even CNN is running this horse dung story that was debunked over a year ago. Thus is nothing but a lying distraction.
 
Back
Top