More Bad News For JPP's Coal & Oil Shills

Thing1 said:
Computers on desktops?

LOL
Click to expand...

Your snark only shows your lack of understanding about what we are talking about. I know you think you are being cute and pithy. But you have yet to offer any scientific rational.

You seem to be placing your entire hope on the fact that we went from huge mainframe computers to desk tops.


You apparently believe that there are zero limitations on scientific discovery

You have been watching too much Star Trek
 
Thing1 said:
You should see the stuff that righties post about "endless oil."
Click to expand...
To all intents and purposes; oil, gas and coal are endless. There is way more than is needed until 4th nuclear fission reactors come onstream in 15-20 years time. There is currently enough gas and oil to last up to the end of the century by which time they will no longer be needed.

Sent from my iPhone 25 GT Turbo
 
Right said:
I don't know about "endless", but you can't argue against the fact that there are more proven petrol reserves now than anytime in the past.
Click to expand...
And more being discovered all the time on places like Africa, Asia and Australia.

Sent from my iPhone 25 GT Turbo
 
Milagro said:
There have been many attempts to build a device that violates the laws of thermodynamics. All have failed. Thermodynamics is one of the few areas of science in which there are no exceptions.

Sent from my iPhone 25 GT Turbo
Click to expand...

No alternative energy forms violate the laws of thermodynamics you disingenuous hack.
 
Milagro said:
And more being discovered all the time on places like Africa, Asia and Australia.

Sent from my iPhone 25 GT Turbo
Click to expand...

I like the prospects for geothermal. Once we get all that petrol out of the way we'll be able to drill deeper and harness all that heat.
 
Alice in Liberaland said:
Your snark only shows your lack of understanding about what we are talking about. I know you think you are being cute and pithy. But you have yet to offer any scientific rational.

You seem to be placing your entire hope on the fact that we went from huge mainframe computers to desk tops.


You apparently believe that there are zero limitations on scientific discovery

You have been watching too much Star Trek
Click to expand...

Star Trek was remarkable in it's scientific accuracy, more proof of your scientific illiteracy.
Within 20 years of the show we had;
Communicators, (think flipphone)
Then Tricorders (smartphones)
Dragonspeak ( " Computer? ...Computer? Good morning Computer)

Etc...ad infinitum.

You truly are an ignorant shitstain.
No show in history has been as prescient....as accurate.
 
Rune said:
No alternative energy forms violate the laws of thermodynamics you disingenuous hack.
Click to expand...

You and Sailor keep going out of your way to miss the point.

Solar and wind in of themselves do not violate the laws of thermodynamics.

Read that again. I have never said they did

The point I am trying to make and you and your butt buddy Sailor seem incapable of comprehending is that the laws of thermodynamics make oil, gas and coal more EFFICIENT than wind and solar. Period. It is indisputable. No amount of technology and science can change it.
 
Rune said:
Star Trek was remarkable in it's scientific accuracy, more proof of your scientific illiteracy.
Within 20 years of the show we had;
Communicators, (think flipphone)
Then Tricorders (smartphones)
Dragonspeak ( " Computer? ...Computer? Good morning Computer)

Etc...ad infinitum.

You truly are an ignorant shitstain.
No show in history has been as prescient....as accurate.
Click to expand...

Where are the transporters?
 
Alice in Liberaland said:
You and Sailor keep going out of your way to miss the point.

Solar and wind in of themselves do not violate the laws of thermodynamics.

Read that again. I have never said they did

The point I am trying to make and you and your butt buddy Sailor seem incapable of comprehending is that the laws of thermodynamics make oil, gas and coal more EFFICIENT than wind and solar. Period. It is indisputable. No amount of technology and science can change it.
Click to expand...

You certainly did. I will find the thread and post it. On top of that you are still talking out your ass. I asked you a couple of times what the efficiency of a fossil fuel plant is compared to a solar thermal plant or wind. You never answered. Just blustering hoping some dumb fuck will believe you. Here, let me help you. With your "diffuse" solar bullshit I take it you have never heard of concentrated solar panels or the like. A million btuh of heat is a million btuh of heat no matter what the source. Once again, your "knowledge" of thermodynamics is lacking. Like completely.
 
Milagro said:
Betz Law states that the maximum efficiency possible from a wind turbine is 59%, even in Houston.

Sent from my iPhone 25 GT Turbo
Click to expand...

In other words...

You AGREE IHA is lying when he claimed wind and solar power will never become more efficient, nor improve their output beyond their current levels.
 
Rune said:
Star Trek was remarkable in it's scientific accuracy, more proof of your scientific illiteracy.
Within 20 years of the show we had;
Communicators, (think flipphone)
Then Tricorders (smartphones)
Dragonspeak ( " Computer? ...Computer? Good morning Computer)

Etc...ad infinitum.

You truly are an ignorant shitstain.
No show in history has been as prescient....as accurate.
Click to expand...
Ignorant fucker, the Machine Stops was written in 1909 and predicted much of today's world!!

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Machine_Stops

Sent from my Lenovo K52e78 using Tapatalk
 
Sailor said:
You certainly did. I will find the thread and post it. On top of that you are still talking out your ass. I asked you a couple of times what the efficiency of a fossil fuel plant is compared to a solar thermal plant or wind. You never answered. Just blustering hoping some dumb fuck will believe you. Here, let me help you. With your "diffuse" solar bullshit I take it you have never heard of concentrated solar panels or the like. A million btuh of heat is a million btuh of heat no matter what the source. Once again, your "knowledge" of thermodynamics is lacking. Like completely.
Click to expand...

You are wrong
 
Sailor said:
You certainly did. I will find the thread and post it. On top of that you are still talking out your ass. I asked you a couple of times what the efficiency of a fossil fuel plant is compared to a solar thermal plant or wind. You never answered. Just blustering hoping some dumb fuck will believe you. Here, let me help you. With your "diffuse" solar bullshit I take it you have never heard of concentrated solar panels or the like. A million btuh of heat is a million btuh of heat no matter what the source. Once again, your "knowledge" of thermodynamics is lacking. Like completely.
Click to expand...
See post 112.

Sent from my Lenovo K52e78 using Tapatalk
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top