More Bad News For JPP's Coal & Oil Shills

Stretch said:
1) Laughers and scoffers don't bother me.
2) Simple math shows millions of years of oil and has constantly been renewing with lighter crude showing up as the newer batches. So, its already been replenishing over many, many lifetimes.
3) It's not from "fossils". No animals and plants have been found in depths below 100 miles.
4) Do them all from personal choice. I don't care. Oil, gas, coal, wind, solar...whatever floats your boat. :)

National Geographic mirrors leftist ideologies in all forms of its media anyway.
Click to expand...
:)
 
Cypress said:
I'm not going to play word games with you. I have never understood why most message boarders feel the need to play arm chair expert on every topic under the sun. I worked for near a decade in petroleum exploration. But if it somehow suits your cyber-ego to think you know more than me about petroleum, I have no vested interest in debunking your fantasy.

Your assertion that oil is available as an "endless" supply would be laughed out of every oil corporation meeting and seminar I ever attended. Oil takes millions of years to generate, and thus it is not available to us to use as energy in limitless and endless supplies. To suggest or imply anything else is word games suitable only for dunces and ignoramuses.
Click to expand...

Yes it takes millions of years. We have only been extracting it for a hundred. We aren't starting from zero and it has been producing it for hundreds of millions of years. We have plenty. Drill baby drill.

PS

Why have you not retrofitted your home with a form of "alternative" electricity? It's available and according to the JPP experts really cheap and "renewable"
 
Sailor said:
That right there just shows me you do not know fuck all about energy. How to describe it, the terminology, or what that means. Then, to make it worse, when you read the rest of your "schooling" one really realizes you just need to shut up. That is without a doubt the most elementary school level logic of trying to explain this, and completely wrong to boot.
Click to expand...
There have been many attempts to build a device that violates the laws of thermodynamics. All have failed. Thermodynamics is one of the few areas of science in which there are no exceptions.

Sent from my iPhone 25 GT Turbo
 
ZappasGuitar said:
More uninformed IHA blather.

If wind and solar power will never become more efficient, nor improve their output beyond their current levels, then how did the USA just set A RECORD for the percentage of energy provided by alternative fuels?
Click to expand...
Betz Law states that the maximum efficiency possible from a wind turbine is 59%, even in Houston.

Sent from my iPhone 25 GT Turbo
 
Milagro said:
There have been many attempts to build a device that violates the laws of thermodynamics. All have failed. Thermodynamics is one of the few areas of science in which there are no exceptions.

Sent from my iPhone 25 GT Turbo
Click to expand...

Translation: ILA is 100% correct in what he said. The laws of thermodynamics are immutable. You cannot take a diffuse form of energy like sunlight and turn it into a dense form of energy like coal without massive energy input. It's is IMPOSSIBLE.

Now given Tommys disdain for me it must have pained him to admit I am correct
 
Cypress said:
I worked for near a decade in petroleum exploration. But if it somehow suits your cyber-ego to think you know more than me about petroleum,.
Click to expand...

Typical liberal. You got yours, ... now fuck everyone else.

Seen it a thousand times with wealthy arrogant libs. Even the Goracle's old man was VP for Occidental petroleum after serving in the Senate. I'm sure Al did not return any of that "evil money" after he inherited it. :palm:

Will you return yours? ... and claim the high moral ground?
 
Bigdog said:
Typical liberal. You got yours, ... now fuck everyone else.

Seen it a thousand times with wealthy arrogant libs. Even the Goracle's old man was VP for Occidental petroleum after serving in the Senate. I'm sure Al did not return any of that "evil money" after he inherited it. :palm:

Will you return yours? ... and claim the high moral ground?
Click to expand...

Amazing isn't it?

Rana is a perfect example. He old man worked in oil in Alaska. It was oil money that cured her when her titties turned toxic. You would think she would be more grateful.

She didn't cure that. Oil did
 
Micawber said:
Republicans like the very notion that in a century we can deplete 100 million years of energy conserved by nature from the remains of T Rex and company. It's a "piss on your grave" thing. It makes them happy.
Click to expand...
I'd be a bit more impressed if you said that you didn't drive a car and cycles everywhere!

Sent from my iPhone 25 GT Turbo
 
Thing1 said:
Do the math. At some point, we will be.

The idea that you're arguing any sort of sustainability given the timeframes involves is an immediate credibility nosedive for any other arguments you're trying to make.
Click to expand...
You are very ignorant, I try to educate you but it's an uphill struggle. Have you ever heard of power density? Consider the power density of wind energy, which is about 1.2 W/m^2, and solar photovoltaic, which can produce about 6 W/m^2. Contrast those with a nuclear power plant that typically has a power density of around 60 times that of wind. That is just one of four factors to consider; there are also energy density, cost and scale as well.

Sent from my iPhone 25 GT Turbo
 
Last edited:
Milagro said:
You are very ignorant, I try to educate you but it's an uphill struggle.
Click to expand...

Good luck. You're talking way above his comprehension level.

Thingy can't even understand that the Ocean's PH of 8.1 is alkaline, not acidic :palm:
 
pH is the negative log of hydrogen ion concentration in a water-based solution. The term "pH" was first described by Danish biochemist Søren Peter Lauritz Sørensen in 1909. pH is an abbreviation for "power of hydrogen" where "p" is short for the German word for power, potenz and H is the element symbol for hydrogen. The H is capitalized because it is standard to capitalize element symbols.

pH = -log[H+]
Click to expand...

https://www.thoughtco.com/what-does-ph-stand-for-608888
 
Milagro said:
You are very ignorant, I try to educate you but it's an uphill struggle. Have you ever heard of power density? Consider the power density of wind energy, which is about 1.2 W/m^2, and solar photovoltaic, which can produce about 6 W/m^2. Contrast those with a nuclear power plant that typically has density of around 60 times that of wind. That is just one of four factors to consider; there are also energy density, cost and scale as well.

Sent from my iPhone 25 GT Turbo
Click to expand...

You didn't hear? We are going to science our way out of those pesky thermodynamic challenges. Thingy is convinced that some day in the not too distant future someone is gonna figger out how to make energy travel uphill without expending more energy. It will be exciting times.

And the we will all be eating with our replicator.
 
Alice in Liberaland said:
You didn't hear? We are going to science our way out of those pesky thermodynamic challenges. Thingy is convinced that some day in the not too distant future someone is gonna figger out how to make energy travel uphill without expending more energy. It will be exciting times.

And the we will all be eating with our replicator.
Click to expand...

Computers on desktops?

LOL
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top