Eagle_Eye
Well-known member
So the pic posted here was "porn"...or just snuggle art?![]()
Soft PORN.
I suppose this is considered porn in your eyes.
The creation of Adam by Michelangelo
So the pic posted here was "porn"...or just snuggle art?![]()
Soft PORN.
Then it violated JPP rules...good thing you're not a mod![]()

Whataboutism!
Then it violated JPP rules..
You're not a moderator,STFU
I suppose this is considered porn in your eyes.
The creation of Adam by Michelangelo

I suppose this is considered porn in your eyes.
![]()
The creation of Adam by Michelangelo
I suppose this is considered porn in your eyes.
![]()
The creation of Adam by Michelangelo
Bet they won''t make the same mistake againAs they've already been made aware, Damocles says: "If you are going to post the Melania pictures (or others like it)... Keep it out of any place other than NSFW. I have to delete them because the ads folks freak. So, just keep that stuff in NSFW so I don't have to make stupid rules, etc. It should be simple. The images aren't safe to show a normal boss, so don't put them in places that are not marked NSFW."
https://www.justplainpolitics.com/s...post-the-Melania-pictures-(or-others-like-it)
Rana the imbecile reluctantly had to admit that her Queen was required to at least hide the image with a spoiler.
Bet they won''t make the same mistake againOut of respect
Maybe...I'm just going by post #164....I suspect that they will.
That's considered art by most, although I'm sure there are some Betty Buttercups who would insist that children not see this until they're in their 30s.
The First Strumpet's nudie shots with other nude women are not art; they're meant to titillate those of you male types who get a woody from fantasizing about two chicks together. So while not actually porn since they didn't show any naughty bits, even non-Betty Buttercups wouldn't show that lesbian photo shot to the kids.
You have to admit that for a puritannical and uptight country like the U.S., having a FLOTUS who posed naked for money is pretty hilarious. Even more so because she's the wife of an (R) IMPOTUS beloved by uptight and puritannical fundies everywhere. lol
It's all they've got...
Intent is everything..
The boundary has never been that dufficult for me.
A photograph intended to titilate and appeal to base sexual intincts is not art.
Michelangelo was using his God-given talent to express something transcendent
Horse mierda, the left considers a cross in a pot of urine to be art.
Fun fact:
The Obama administration quietly shuttered the only Justice Department unit that exclusively fought adult obscenity (defined as criminally offensive material that has no “serious literary, political, artistic, or medical value”.)
https://www.thedailybeast.com/obamas-porn-problem-with-liberals-who-want-adult-obscenity-fought
Didn't leftists defend the Charlie Hebdo terrorists who killed 12 people because someone printed some cartoons?
Obscenity is in the mind of the observer. many think your dishonest post and borderline obscenity.
Nobody said that the Creation of Adam is "porn".
The issue isn't Top's eyes, EE. It's what the advertisers object to. They pay some of the bills that allow us to post here without charge, and the site owner wants some images restricted.
"If you are going to post the Melania pictures (or others like it)... Keep it out of any place other than NSFW. I have to delete them because the ads folks freak. So, just keep that stuff in NSFW so I don't have to make stupid rules, etc. It should be simple. The images aren't safe to show a normal boss, so don't put them in places that are not marked NSFW."
https://www.justplainpolitics.com/s...post-the-Melania-pictures-(or-others-like-it)