Melania gets a new tennis court photo op! Everything is peachy keen.

So the pic posted here was "porn"...or just snuggle art?;)

Soft PORN.

I suppose this is considered porn in your eyes.

BiJxnsW.png


The creation of Adam by Michelangelo
 
Then it violated JPP rules..

As they've already been made aware, Damocles says: "If you are going to post the Melania pictures (or others like it)... Keep it out of any place other than NSFW. I have to delete them because the ads folks freak. So, just keep that stuff in NSFW so I don't have to make stupid rules, etc. It should be simple. The images aren't safe to show a normal boss, so don't put them in places that are not marked NSFW."


https://www.justplainpolitics.com/s...post-the-Melania-pictures-(or-others-like-it)


Rana the imbecile reluctantly had to admit that her Queen was required to at least hide the image with a spoiler.
 
You're not a moderator,STFU

Rana the imbecile isn't much of one, since she was apparently unaware of the policy.

Damocles owns the forum, and he said, "If you are going to post the Melania pictures (or others like it)... Keep it out of any place other than NSFW. I have to delete them because the ads folks freak. So, just keep that stuff in NSFW so I don't have to make stupid rules, etc. It should be simple. The images aren't safe to show a normal boss, so don't put them in places that are not marked NSFW."


https://www.justplainpolitics.com/s...post-the-Melania-pictures-(or-others-like-it)
 
I suppose this is considered porn in your eyes.

The creation of Adam by Michelangelo

That's considered art by most, although I'm sure there are some Betty Buttercups who would insist that children not see this until they're in their 30s. :laugh:

The First Strumpet's nudie shots with other nude women are not art; they're meant to titillate those of you male types who get a woody from fantasizing about two chicks together. So while not actually porn since they didn't show any naughty bits, even non-Betty Buttercups wouldn't show that lesbian photo shot to the kids.

You have to admit that for a puritannical and uptight country like the U.S., having a FLOTUS who posed naked for money is pretty hilarious. Even more so because she's the wife of an (R) IMPOTUS beloved by uptight and puritannical fundies everywhere. lol
 
I suppose this is considered porn in your eyes.
BiJxnsW.png


The creation of Adam by Michelangelo

Nobody said that the Creation of Adam is "porn".

The issue isn't Top's eyes, EE. It's what the advertisers object to. They pay some of the bills that allow us to post here without charge, and the site owner wants some images restricted.

"If you are going to post the Melania pictures (or others like it)... Keep it out of any place other than NSFW. I have to delete them because the ads folks freak. So, just keep that stuff in NSFW so I don't have to make stupid rules, etc. It should be simple. The images aren't safe to show a normal boss, so don't put them in places that are not marked NSFW."


https://www.justplainpolitics.com/s...post-the-Melania-pictures-(or-others-like-it)
 
I suppose this is considered porn in your eyes.

BiJxnsW.png


The creation of Adam by Michelangelo

Intent is everything..

The boundary has never been that dufficult for me.

A photograph intended to titilate and appeal to base sexual intincts is not art.

Michelangelo was using his God-given talent to express something transcendent
 
As they've already been made aware, Damocles says: "If you are going to post the Melania pictures (or others like it)... Keep it out of any place other than NSFW. I have to delete them because the ads folks freak. So, just keep that stuff in NSFW so I don't have to make stupid rules, etc. It should be simple. The images aren't safe to show a normal boss, so don't put them in places that are not marked NSFW."


https://www.justplainpolitics.com/s...post-the-Melania-pictures-(or-others-like-it)


Rana the imbecile reluctantly had to admit that her Queen was required to at least hide the image with a spoiler.
Bet they won''t make the same mistake again:) Out of respect;)
 
That's considered art by most, although I'm sure there are some Betty Buttercups who would insist that children not see this until they're in their 30s. :laugh:

The First Strumpet's nudie shots with other nude women are not art; they're meant to titillate those of you male types who get a woody from fantasizing about two chicks together. So while not actually porn since they didn't show any naughty bits, even non-Betty Buttercups wouldn't show that lesbian photo shot to the kids.

You have to admit that for a puritannical and uptight country like the U.S., having a FLOTUS who posed naked for money is pretty hilarious. Even more so because she's the wife of an (R) IMPOTUS beloved by uptight and puritannical fundies everywhere. lol

FIG leafs and 'drapes' in many churches and museums. At least in the US.
 
Intent is everything..

The boundary has never been that dufficult for me.

A photograph intended to titilate and appeal to base sexual intincts is not art.

Michelangelo was using his God-given talent to express something transcendent

Horse mierda, the left considers a cross in a pot of urine to be art.
 
Fun fact:

The Obama administration quietly shuttered the only Justice Department unit that exclusively fought adult obscenity (defined as criminally offensive material that has no “serious literary, political, artistic, or medical value”.)

https://www.thedailybeast.com/obamas-porn-problem-with-liberals-who-want-adult-obscenity-fought
 
Fun fact:

The Obama administration quietly shuttered the only Justice Department unit that exclusively fought adult obscenity (defined as criminally offensive material that has no “serious literary, political, artistic, or medical value”.)

https://www.thedailybeast.com/obamas-porn-problem-with-liberals-who-want-adult-obscenity-fought

Obscenity is in the mind of the observer. many think your dishonest post and borderline obscenity.
 
Nobody said that the Creation of Adam is "porn".

The issue isn't Top's eyes, EE. It's what the advertisers object to. They pay some of the bills that allow us to post here without charge, and the site owner wants some images restricted.

"If you are going to post the Melania pictures (or others like it)... Keep it out of any place other than NSFW. I have to delete them because the ads folks freak. So, just keep that stuff in NSFW so I don't have to make stupid rules, etc. It should be simple. The images aren't safe to show a normal boss, so don't put them in places that are not marked NSFW."


https://www.justplainpolitics.com/s...post-the-Melania-pictures-(or-others-like-it)

I wasn't replying to Top. It's Damo's site and I will comply with his wishes.
 
Back
Top