Yes, real history isn't your strong point. that;s why you rely on historical fantasy pretty much 100% of the time.
Mark Levin on Tariffs and courts.
- Thread starter Truth Detector
- Start date
Yes, real history isn't your strong point. that;s why you rely on historical fantasy pretty much 100% of the time.
heads of state murder people over Jay walking laws too.
this is an odd case of cherry picking a bad aspect of war.
the whole nation eventually benefitted from the tariffs that made America a global superpower.
you're welcome.
the mistake was getting rid of them ever.
Moderate tariffs, not the idiotic 300% ones, which are nothing more than an extortion racket against the South at the time. They completely altered the entire tax system to favor the northern interests, then sniveled and cried when they said 'fuck you' and started setting up their own trade union. They decided on a 10% tariff. Guess who would then be getting most of the shipping trade? They would have dominated the western trade and forced a bunch of crooks into having to compete in an open market instead of one ruled by trusts and bankers.
Into the Night
Verified User
Inversion fallacy.
Buzzword fallacy.
Go learn what a 'shill' is. Go learn English.
Go learn what 'ideologue' means. Buzzword fallacy.
Buzzword fallacies. Random phrases. No argument presented.
Go learn English.
Into the Night
Verified User
Random words. No apparent coherency. Go learn English.
Into the Night
Verified User
Random words and phrases. No apparent coherency. Argument from randU fallacy. No argument presented.
Into the Night
Verified User
What 'tariff'???
What 'tax system'???
What 'trade union'???
What 'tariff'???
?????????
What 'tariff'???
What 'tax system'???
What 'trade union'???
What 'tariff'???
?????????
Yes, you are indeed completely ignorant. Nothing new there. We get it; Democrats All Bad all the time. Republicans all good all the time. Your self-assigned job is be the thought Police for the idiots who think the GOP is grand, and you can't stand anything that doesn't promote that bullshit. You're no different than the commie deviants in that regard.
Now post 20 more pages of parsed rubbish and pretend you're a Player. lol
Into the Night
Verified User
Of what??? Your wacky wanderings?
Quite true. You've turned feeling bad into an art form.
I would say most do these days.
?????
You have no idea what communism is, do you?
Random words ignored.
More strawmen, no refutations, as expected.
Into the Night
Verified User
Random words. No argument presented.
Sammy Jankis
Was it me?
yes. libertarians and communists have the same goal, the eventual destruction of the state so nobody can tell oligarchs no.
Projection
The process of displacing one’s feelings onto a different person, animal, or object. The term is most commonly used to describe defensive projection—attributing one’s own unacceptable urges to another.
Dumbest shit I've read today. What really must suck is you being a brainless halfwit with the IQ of a lemming thinking you know what you are erroneously whining about.
ignorance
/ĭg′nər-əns/
noun
The condition of being uneducated, unaware, or uninformed.
The condition of being ignorant; the lack of knowledge in general, or in relation to a particular subject; the state of being uneducated or uninformed.
A willful neglect or refusal to acquire knowledge which one may acquire and it is his duty to have.
FIFY brainless dumb fuck.
Projection
The process of displacing one’s feelings onto a different person, animal, or object. The term is most commonly used to describe defensive projection—attributing one’s own unacceptable urges to another.
FIFY brainless dumb fuck.
Projection
The process of displacing one’s feelings onto a different person, animal, or object. The term is most commonly used to describe defensive projection—attributing one’s own unacceptable urges to another.
Are you afraid if you don't suck up to the GOP shills here they will change the secret handshake and lock you out of the treehouse? lol
Oh my, I triggered a GOP shill. Good.
During the period when the U.S. federal government was funded entirely by tariffs, primarily from 1790 to 1860, the economy relied heavily on import duties as its main source of revenue. This reliance on tariffs not only generated funds for the government but also served to protect emerging domestic industries from foreign competition, fostering early industrial growth in the nation. -- duck duck go assist
Compare those to the ones Lincoln wanted forced on the country. They were ridiculously high and would only serve to help monopolies and Wall Street bankers, already corrupt and incompetent. It was mote than just tariffs, it was the massive land giveaways to the railroads, the Homestead Acts, which were basically just a franchise of the railroad giveaways, and the Land Acts, all just freebies for speculators and insiders like the pols profiting from the govt. construction and land giveaways to the Union Pacific scam.
Crédit Mobilier scandal - Wikipedia
That is one of the dumbest positions I have ever heard. Of course the people who have to pay a tax are allowed to challenge the tax. If they do not pay the tax, they will go to prison, are you arguing that they cannot challenge being sent to prison?
Obviously, the importers have a legal standing to challenge the law, because they have to pay the taxes.
The Framers of the Constitution definitely gave the right to redress in the courts when taxed.
The Constitution clearly says that duties(another name for tariffs) are under the sole authority of the Congress. It goes on to say Congress has sole authority over trade, and taxes in general.
The president has to consult with Senate, and get a two thirds support from the Senate over treaties. But, treaties would not generally raise tariffs. You end a war with a peace treaty, but it would be odd to start a war with a war treaty. When the Japanese bombed Pearl Harbor, the USA unilaterally responded by declaring war. We did not negotiate with the Japanese to declare a war treaty. The same is true with a trade war.
So all foreign countries have to do is not agree, and your whole argument falls apart?
It is about INTERSTATE commerce. Not foreign trade.
So when the Constitution says "foreign nations", you think it was just a joke?
Fort Sumter did not blockade the port, so you have no point.
That would be a bit extreme.
Sammy Jankis
Was it me?
yes.During the period when the U.S. federal government was funded entirely by tariffs, primarily from 1790 to 1860, the economy relied heavily on import duties as its main source of revenue. This reliance on tariffs not only generated funds for the government but also served to protect emerging domestic industries from foreign competition, fostering early industrial growth in the nation. -- duck duck go assist
Compare those to the ones Lincoln wanted forced on the country. They were ridiculously high and would only serve to help monopolies and Wall Street bankers, already corrupt and incompetent. It was mote than just tariffs, it was the massive land giveaways to the railroads, the Homestead Acts, which were basically just a franchise of the railroad giveaways, and the Land Acts, all just freebies for speculators and insiders like the pols profiting from the govt. construction and land giveaways to the Union Pacific scam.
Crédit Mobilier scandal - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
that was all kinds of mercantilism and fascism all mixed together.
the illuminists are capable of growing a country and causing it to flourish as well.
they are smart people, capable of great good or evil, according to their whim.
I pray for them.
Trump's tariffs are much more in line with those back then, before Lincoln, 10%-30% range, with a few punitive ones, which usually get negotiated back down as they lower their tariffs on our stuff. After 1870 they were back to that range but a little higher, some in the 50% range, but the land and railroad scams were still in effect and the 'Gilded Age' of SC corruption, judicial activism, and general warfare on small and medium businesses created a 'Left' in this country that didn't exist pre-civil war.
Last edited:
Hey dumbass, that was the while point of it being there, idiot. Buchanan tried to use it to keep collecting Union tariffs, and all that did was cause 4 other states to secede; Lincoln wanted that exact same reaction, and got it. If anybody refused to be shaken down trying to enter the harbor, they would be fired upon by the fort.
Mn, you really are never right; an amazing 100% record so far.