Manafort suffering depression, anxiety, gout in jail

I said that in the future, he will be regarded as a political prisoner. I stand by that. As soon as he stopped cooperating with Mueller, they threw him in the hole. There are medical wards in hospitals. That is where he belongs.

Not for gout and depression....

You know there's a new problem about paying off indebtedness with polling data.
 
The motive was money. It was literally the subject of Manafort's trial, it's literally what Gates testified about. They they were laundering money and enriching themselves.

Were you not paying attention 6 months ago? Or has your selective amnesia relapsed?
that was not when Manafort was campaign manager.
It was back when he was a lobbiest/agent for the Party of Regions which is a Ukraine party -not Russian.
 
The motive was money. It was literally the subject of Manafort's trial, it's literally what Gates testified about. They they were laundering money and enriching themselves.

Were you not paying attention 6 months ago? Or has your selective amnesia relapsed?


Money laundering, tax evasion and fraud are all crimes.. Is Manafort now considered a snowflake???
 
ROFL @ your clinging to "Russian tax cuts"

the economy is booming . 220k manufacturing jobs this year alone, still record low minority unemployment.
GDP above 3% for the year (wait for it) and solid wage growth

The Economy Is Finally Coming Through for U.S. Workers
Decent wage gains are showing up in paychecks. That should continue for a while.
https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/a...vjQtsZtuA-jyRtN20WAuFlnM_WH-iGyvWm0dvMlCIsgiQ

Before you go crazy, let's make a couple things clear.

Wages have not grown for 90% of workers. In fact, for 90% of workers, they've either flatlined or declined.

Wage growth accelerates for workers, but salaries for the 1% just reached a new high
https://www.marketwatch.com/story/wages-for-the-1-just-reached-their-highest-level-ever-2018-10-18

Wages grew 3.1% on the year in October, the highest level in nine years, according data released Friday by the Bureau of Labor Statistics.

...

The average wage for the top 1% of income earners hit $719,000 per year in 2017, up 3.7% on the year, exceeding their peak of $716,000 per year just before the Great Recession, according to a report released last month by the Economic Policy Institute, a progressive, nonprofit think tank, citing data from the Social Security Administration.


Inflation over that period is about 2.8-3.0% depending on who you ask.

So...if wages grew by 3.1%, but they grew 3.7% for the 1%, and inflation was about 2.8-3%, then that means the majority of workers did not see a pay increase in 2018 because the law of averages dictates that in order for total wage growth to be 3.1%, and wage growth for the top 1% was 3.7%, then wage growth for the bottom 99% has to be below 3.1%, and below inflation, because, math.
 
the economy is booming

No it's not. It might be for the wealthy, but it isn't for everyone else.


220k manufacturing jobs this year alone

Which, when placed in historical context is a true nothingburger.


still record low minority unemployment

Thanks, Obama.


GDP above 3% for the year (wait for it) and solid wage growth

1. GDP over 3% (barely, like 3.1%) only because a full percentage point of that growth from Q2 was due entirely to the rush caused by the tariffs. Then that came crashing back down to earth the following quarter.

2. Solid wage growth...for the 1%. Their wages grew 3.7% which brought up the average to 3.1%. So if wages for the top 1% grew by 3.7%, but the total wage growth was only 3.1%, that means wages for 99% of workers grew less than the total average, flat with inflation or below it.
 
Because it was shared so the GRU would use it to target and influence weak minded Conservatives and sophists, like yourself.
cite. and with more then your fevered Putin delusions


1. Why was the Trump campaign even in contact with Russian officials?

2. Why did Trump lie about people in his campaign having any contact with Russia?

3. Since when is sharing polling data "basic communications"? Or is this another one of your patented goalpost shifts?
Manafort was there for a month - maybe he became campaign manager to pay off his farcical debts to Putin?

Flynn had legit reasons for talking to Russians as incoming DNI. Despite the Logan act nonsense that got him unmasked.
Oh and we just found out Flynn was in contact with the FBI on his Russian dinner meeting with Putin!

https://theduran.com/secret-evidence-vindicates-michael-flynns-treasonous-dinner-with-putin/
The Obama administration knew everything about Flynn’s RT dinner, as he fully briefed US intelligence officials on the trip.
DutyerZVYAM3JEh.jpg


Via The Hill:

Were the information Grassley requested made public, America would have learned this, according to my sources:

Before Flynn made his infamous December 2015 trip to Moscow — as a retired general and then-adviser to Donald Trump’s presidential campaign — he alerted his former employer, the DIA.

He then attended a “defensive” or “protective” briefing before he ever sat alongside Vladimir Putin at the Russia Today (RT) dinner, or before he talked with Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak.

The briefing educated and sensitized Flynn to possible efforts by his Russian host to compromise the former high-ranking defense official and prepared him for conversations in which he could potentially extract intelligence for U.S. agencies such as the DIA.

When Flynn returned from Moscow, he spent time briefing intelligence officials on what he learned during the Moscow contacts. Between two and nine intelligence officials attended the various meetings with Flynn about the RT event, and the information was moderately useful, about what one would expect from a public event, according to my sources.

In other words – when Obama’s former Acting Attorney General Sally Yates publicly claimed Flynn had possibly been “compromised” by Moscow, the American public was denied the context surrounding the controversial RT dinner as the Justice Department remained silent.

Solomon notes that “Rather than a diplomatic embarrassment bordering on treason, Flynn’s conduct at the RT event provided some modest benefit to the U.S. intelligence community, something that many former military and intelligence officers continue to offer their country after retirement when they keep security clearances.”
 
that was not when Manafort was campaign manager.

LOL! THAT trial wasn't. But the other charges.. in the other jurisdictions were. The charges in the jurisdiction for which Manafort just plead guilty.



t was back when he was a lobbiest/agent for the Party of Regions which is a Ukraine party -not Russian.

It's sophistry to pretend the pro-Russian Ukranians Manafort worked for before Trump had no ties to Putin and Russia.
 
cite. and with more then your fevered Putin delusions

What do you think this conversation is about, idiot?

What do you think Manafort's lawyers accidentally revealed yesterday?

Wow.

The sophistry is strong with you.
 
Manafort was there for a month - maybe he became campaign manager to pay off his farcical debts to Putin?

Flynn had legit reasons for talking to Russians as incoming DNI. Despite the Logan act nonsense that got him unmasked.
Oh and we just found out Flynn was in contact with the FBI on his Russian dinner meeting with Putin!

https://theduran.com/secret-evidence-vindicates-michael-flynns-treasonous-dinner-with-putin/
The Obama administration knew everything about Flynn’s RT dinner, as he fully briefed US intelligence officials on the trip.
DutyerZVYAM3JEh.jpg


Via The Hill:

Were the information Grassley requested made public, America would have learned this, according to my sources:

Before Flynn made his infamous December 2015 trip to Moscow — as a retired general and then-adviser to Donald Trump’s presidential campaign — he alerted his former employer, the DIA.

He then attended a “defensive” or “protective” briefing before he ever sat alongside Vladimir Putin at the Russia Today (RT) dinner, or before he talked with Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak.

The briefing educated and sensitized Flynn to possible efforts by his Russian host to compromise the former high-ranking defense official and prepared him for conversations in which he could potentially extract intelligence for U.S. agencies such as the DIA.

When Flynn returned from Moscow, he spent time briefing intelligence officials on what he learned during the Moscow contacts. Between two and nine intelligence officials attended the various meetings with Flynn about the RT event, and the information was moderately useful, about what one would expect from a public event, according to my sources.

In other words – when Obama’s former Acting Attorney General Sally Yates publicly claimed Flynn had possibly been “compromised” by Moscow, the American public was denied the context surrounding the controversial RT dinner as the Justice Department remained silent.

Solomon notes that “Rather than a diplomatic embarrassment bordering on treason, Flynn’s conduct at the RT event provided some modest benefit to the U.S. intelligence community, something that many former military and intelligence officers continue to offer their country after retirement when they keep security clearances.”

So notice how your strategy is just to flame the board will bullshit that has nothing to do with what I asked.

1. Why was the Drumpf campaign even in contact with Russian officials?

2. Why did Drumpf lie about people in his campaign having any contact with Russia?

3. Since when is sharing polling data "basic communications"? Or is this another one of your patented goalpost shifts?
 
No it's not. It might be for the wealthy, but it isn't for everyone else.
wage growth and good job growth is across ALL SECTORS. You sound like an idiot socialist.
Do you live in AOC's district?

Which, when placed in historical context is a true nothingburger.
Obama lost 200K manufacturing jobs, and then had the stupidity to say "they aren't coming back"
unless Trump had a magic wand.

Thanks, Obama.
historic lows were under Trump, not Obama


1. GDP over 3% (barely, like 3.1%) only because a full percentage point of that growth from Q2 was due entirely to the rush caused by the tariffs. Then that came crashing back down to earth the following quarter.
stupid. annual GDP considers the entire year. quarter by quarter numbers don't matter

2. Solid wage growth...for the 1%. Their wages grew 3.7% which brought up the average to 3.1%. So if wages for the top 1% grew by 3.7%, but the total wage growth was only 3.1%, that means wages for 99% of workers grew less than the total average, flat with inflation or below it.
GDP and wage growth are superior to Obama's who chugged along at 2% for both ( per annum)
 
So notice how your strategy is just to flame the board will bullshit that has nothing to do with what I asked.

1. Why was the Drumpf campaign even in contact with Russian officials?

2. Why did Drumpf lie about people in his campaign having any contact with Russia?

3. Since when is sharing polling data "basic communications"? Or is this another one of your patented goalpost shifts?
answered. stop posting and start reading for comprehension
 
Not to mention taking foot longs


Jailed former Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort is suffering from depression, anxiety and “severe gout” while behind bars, his lawyers say in new court filings.

Manafort is being kept in solitary confinement “to ensure his safety” but the conditions “have taken a toll on his physical and mental health,” his attorneys wrote in a document made public Tuesday.



https://nypost.com/2019/01/08/manafort-suffering-depression-anxiety-gout-in-jail-lawyers/

so......now he knows how innocent black men feel being locked up.

the fuckin pussy needs to stop whinning
 
It's sophistry to pretend the pro-Russian Ukranians Manafort worked for before Trump had no ties to Putin and Russia.
Manafort was trying to get the Party of Region. to look more to Europe not Russia.
From the analysis set out in the previous section of this Report, the answer to the problem is clear -- Victor Yanukovych must be replaced.-- Paul Manafort in a June 2005 memo
You look at anything that has to do even remotely with Russia and become triggered without understanding situations
 
he's not getting healthcare if he developed gout.
Lot's of people talk about prisoners rights in regards to diet and religion; but keeping people in cages is inhuman.
I wouldn't even do it to any simian

It's their problem to solve - but nobody cares so they get away with it

You have got to be kidding me...…..coming from one of the most racist pricks on this board who has never had a soft spot for black men in prison.

GTFOH.....you racist fucks are something else.
 
They have to protect Manafort from the general population. Prisons must be awful.. I guess that's why most people obey the law.. They don't want to go there.

Your body produces uric acid when it breaks down purines — substances that are found naturally in your body.

Purines are also found in certain foods, such as steak, organ meats and seafood. Other foods also promote higher levels of uric acid, such as alcoholic beverages, especially beer, and drinks sweetened with fruit sugar (fructose).

Normally, uric acid dissolves in your blood and passes through your kidneys into your urine.

unless of course your black......then you can serve time for crimes you didn't commit.
 
Back
Top