Manafort Innocent?

Irthriuth said:
manadort is irrelevant and muh Russia is fake news

Not guilty verdict would be awesome just for liberal tears tho
Click to expand...


As I said, every JPP liberal thinks Trump is guilty of "colluding" with Putin. Whether they say it publicly or not is a different story because they don't want to be embarrassed. But, in their heart of hearts, they are 1000% convinced that Trump and Putin cheated Hillary out of the election.

This all stems back to the election. And it wasn't about them being wrong. People are wrong about predictions all the time (except you and me of course). What is driving this is that they were so certain of her winning they never once allowed Trump a scintilla of a chance of winning. Not once. There was ZERO scenario where they could see Trump winning. They believe that Obama's victory reshaped the American electorate forever. They believed the "demographics is destiny" crap.

So when such an improbability happened it literally shook them to their core. Instead of looking inward and asking "Did we nominate the wrong person" or "Is there something going in the country that we don't understand", the only thing they could think was "WE WERE CHEATED"

Remember, democrats never lose elections because people aren't buying what they are selling. There are always some other nefarious reasons

- Hanging chads
- Their voters can't read ballots created by democrats but it is the republicans fault
- long lines in democrat run precincts but it is the republicans who are suppressing voters
- They just didn't get their message out
- Muh Russia

Manafort being convicted will only serve as a talking point for the left because he spent one month on Trumps campaign. So they will try to sully Trump with that.

But you are right. If Manafort is acquitted they will lose their collective minds and rest assured they will blame Judge Ellis. They will claim that he was biased against the prosecution and was a puppet of Putin and Trump. I guarantee it.
 
hvilleherb said:
The term "witch hunt" has been used for a reason.

This was all started with the Steele dossier. The Steele dossier was a result of Hillary's money. Then there was the involvement of Peter Strzok and his secret society.
Click to expand...

Which is why we need a 2nd special counsel.
 
I find it funny that 18 months into an alleged collusion investigation, all we are talking about is banking infractions with a guy who was once on the Trump campaign.

This muller investigation is beyond a joke.
 
Irish said:
I find it funny that 18 months into an alleged collusion investigation, all we are talking about is banking infractions with a guy who was once on the Trump campaign.

This muller investigation is beyond a joke.
Click to expand...

18 months into the Watergate investigation all we were talking about was a two-bit burglary with some guys who the president had never heard of.
 
Jarod said:
18 months into the Watergate investigation all we were talking about was a two-bit burglary with some guys who the president had never heard of.
Click to expand...

And when Nixon slunk out of the Oval Office over 50% of Republican voters still approved of him.

So...
 
Darth Omar said:
I’m far from convinced Putin had anything to do with the DNC hack/leaks.
Click to expand...

Crowdstrike has a bad record /it depends on this (invented) Russian cutout as a go between for Assange and the Russian government -and the FBI never investigated the server -which the DNC refused to turn over.

That has deep state shenanigans written all over it
 
Teflon Don said:
As I said, every JPP liberal thinks Trump is guilty of "colluding" with Putin. Whether they say it publicly or not is a different story because they don't want to be embarrassed. But, in their heart of hearts, they are 1000% convinced that Trump and Putin cheated Hillary out of the election.

This all stems back to the election. And it wasn't about them being wrong. People are wrong about predictions all the time (except you and me of course). What is driving this is that they were so certain of her winning they never once allowed Trump a scintilla of a chance of winning. Not once. There was ZERO scenario where they could see Trump winning. They believe that Obama's victory reshaped the American electorate forever. They believed the "demographics is destiny" crap.

So when such an improbability happened it literally shook them to their core. Instead of looking inward and asking "Did we nominate the wrong person" or "Is there something going in the country that we don't understand", the only thing they could think was "WE WERE CHEATED"

Remember, democrats never lose elections because people aren't buying what they are selling. There are always some other nefarious reasons

- Hanging chads
- Their voters can't read ballots created by democrats but it is the republicans fault
- long lines in democrat run precincts but it is the republicans who are suppressing voters
- They just didn't get their message out
- Muh Russia

Manafort being convicted will only serve as a talking point for the left because he spent one month on Trumps campaign. So they will try to sully Trump with that.

But you are right. If Manafort is acquitted they will lose their collective minds and rest assured they will blame Judge Ellis. They will claim that he was biased against the prosecution and was a puppet of Putin and Trump. I guarantee it.
Click to expand...

^Laughable rambling bullshit
 
Lesh said:
So speaketh the Russian Troll.

Keep your posts short and people might not notice the ridiculous syntax
Click to expand...

If you are stupid enough to; take that false/fake news/ false witness testimony. Run with it. I consent. TDS sicko. I testify truly.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top