Manafort Innocent?
- Thread starter Jarod
- Start date
hvilleherb
Verified User
The term "witch hunt" has been used for a reason.
This was all started with the Steele dossier. The Steele dossier was a result of Hillary's money. Then there was the involvement of Peter Strzok and his secret society.
Teflon Don
I'm back baby
Oh Jarod are you trying to be cute again? Are you really pretending to not know what people are talking about when they call this a witch hunt?
Do you really think that when people are calling this investigation a witch hunt they are talking about Manafort?
Come Jarod. Tell me you aren’t that obtuse. If you admit to pleading ignorance, I will answer your question.
But you have to say “I Jarod am completely ignorant when it comes to the word witch hunt in relation to the Mueller investigation”
You have to type those exact words
Moot. Who cares about the prosecution of anyone concerning INCOME TAX evasion? If convicted....there's a presidential pardon awaiting. Or....who cares about the prosecution of an unethical lawyer? The only reason for concern for any tax payer is why it cost 10s of millions of tax payer dollars to prosecute common criminals when the US has the best justice department on the face of the earth.
Did it really take a "SPECIAL COUNSEL" to prosecute these known crimes that occurred YEARS AGO while Mr. Trump was nothing but a real estate mogul and tv personality...years before the walk down that escalator that you and the liberal world laughed about? Who will get the last laugh? Its already happened in Nov. 2016. That's why you get so excited dry humping Mueller...… you wish 2016 was nothing but a bad dream.
Last edited:
Three responses from the Trump supporters...
...and none of them really answered the questions.
What is that about?
MOOT: NO LEGAL SIGNIFICANCE.
And still none!
Tranquillus in Exile
New member
BS. It started BEFORE the Steele dossier. From late 2015 the CIA and NSA were repeatedly warned by friendly intel agencies of "suspicious communications" between Trump associates and known Russian agents.
It was unprecedented in a US presidential election, but by summer of 2016 the FBI had to take some action. That's when the investigation started.
More of those skills?
Lets try again.....real slow like you are a 5 year old African America being taught in our public school systems down in the hood. MOOT: NO LEGAL SIGNIFIANCE
DRY HUMP: Street language for self masturbation. The left jerks off every time Mueller farts.
Look, if Trump boot-lickers are now clearly in the pro-Kremlin camp, willing to collude with a adversarial foreign power to undermine American elections, how far of a leap do you think it is for them to want criminals to go free simply on a perception that it will be "sticking it" to Mueller and Democrats?
More of those skills?
MOOT: NO LEGAL SIGNIFIANCE
DRY HUMP: Street language for self masturbation. The left jerks off every time Mueller farts.
And still none!
Still with the skills? Because you don't like the answers does not mean they don't exist. If you do not want to know the answer....don't ask the question.
That's what is meant by attempting to frame an argument around any negative position. You demand only to hear the answers that your false premise is asking. Its an argument based upon ignorance. What makes you assume you have the power to steer or direct any argument when you are clearly outclassed? This could go on post after post.....as long as you are glutton for punishment. But....sometimes one grows tried of kicking an ankle bitter. 
Last edited:
evince
Truthmatters
an out right lie fucking idiot
evince
Truthmatters
More of those skills?
MOOT: NO LEGAL SIGNIFIANCE
DRY HUMP: Street language for self masturbation. The left jerks off every time Mueller farts.
do you get your tiny brain overheated in your burka ...oops I mean klan hood?
Still with the skills? Because you don't like the answers does not mean they don't exist. If you do not want to know the answer....don't ask the question.
I want to know the answer.
That is why I asked the question.
I still do not know if you are saying "yes" or "no."
Perhaps you don't either.
If you just want to "tell me off" or some other juvenile thingy...do it. But don't pretend it was an answer to my question.
evince
Truthmatters
Another yapping Ankle Bitter?
all you have is lies and subpar insults you brain cancer on society
And the answer was addressed, clearly, with no ambiguity except to those who are "IGNORANT", as you have demonstrated. MOOT: NO LEGAL SIGNIFICANCE
How does the trial of Manafort effect Mr. Trump? Its moot, its a dog and phony show for the self masturbating democrats to dry hump. Convict Manafort...… its moot.
Good grief, Ralph, I hope you don't do permanent damage to your brain with this.
The questions were:
Do you think Manafort is innocent?
Do you not want him convicted simply because he is associated with Trump?
Are you rooting for him because you don't like Mueller?
Just answer them...rather than all that other bullshit...or stop being annoyed with me pointing out that the bullshit is NOT an answer to the questions.
And the answer is the same. ITS MOOT. What part of convict Manafort did you fail to comprehend in that clear unambiguous answer that you did not like? Who cares if another lobbyist bites the dust?