Mail in ballots are essential!

TOP said:
Why would slash the vote totals?
Click to expand...
Try and understand, The right think lower vote totals give them a better chance to win.SAVE will klck about 21 million people off the rolls. That is a smaller vote. The Reds have been involved in many voter suppression techniques since the 1980s, when they figured a lower vote helped them. Our system is extremely good. How will SAVE make it better? It is not designed to do that.
 
Nordberg said:
You can
Try and understand, The right think lower vote totals give them a better chance to win.SAVE will klck about 21 million people off the rolls. That is a smaller vote. The Reds have been involved in many voter suppression techniques since the 1980s, when they figured a lower vote helped them. Our system is extremely good. How will SAVE make it better? It is not designed to do that.
Click to expand...
That's ridiculous. It's not going to kick that many people off the roll It's easy to check your registration and update.If necessary.There's been plenty of notice , and there's plenty of time... There's plenty of time to get an ID if you need one and everyone needs one.

It's not going to suppress anyone. If someone needs help getting an ID, there are tons of groups too, help them get one....And register... And get them to the polls , if they need a ride. I don't know why you Or anyone else's spazzing out... This is a good thing...
 
TOP said:
That's ridiculous. It's not going to kick that many people off the roll It's easy to check your registration and update.If necessary.There's been plenty of notice , and there's plenty of time... There's plenty of time to get an ID if you need one and everyone needs one.

It's not going to suppress anyone. If someone needs help getting an ID, there are tons of groups too, help them get one....And register... And get them to the polls , if they need a ride. I don't know why you Or anyone else's spazzing out... This is a good thing...
Click to expand...
Don't you need an ID to register to vote?
 
Lionfish said:
QPeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee,
Then why do you oppose any voter qualification rules?
You just like masturbating in victim porn.

Don't you wish you were not so stupid?
Click to expand...
You are drooling on yourself in your stupidity.

No one opposes 'any voter qualification rules' and every State has some.

We oppose these current rules which are NOT voter qualification and are 'voter disqualification' tactics.
 
FastLane said:
Don't you need an ID to register to vote?
Click to expand...

Good Question

image.png
 
LurchAddams said:
So here's the real deal.

There is NO election fraud.

What's happening is that trump know's he's fucked the Republican party and himself with his tariffs, war crimes and being a rapist of little girls.

It's a desperate measure by trump and most Republicans to steal upcoming elections because they can win on their merits. @Uncensored2008 knows this as well which is why your trumptard bitch girl is spamming this thread with you.

You suck.
Click to expand...
Showing an ID will only prevent people who intend on cheating from voting. Democrats would never do that would they? So there is no problem with showing an ID to vote.


Glad to see yourr ticker has not given out on you .....yet.

Did you get a stress test.

You are porno star in gay porn.
 
TOP said:
That's ridiculous. It's not going to kick that many people off the roll It's easy to check your registration and update.If necessary.There's been plenty of notice , and there's plenty of time... There's plenty of time to get an ID if you need one and everyone needs one.

It's not going to suppress anyone. If someone needs help getting an ID, there are tons of groups too, help them get one....And register... And get them to the polls , if they need a ride. I don't know why you Or anyone else's spazzing out... This is a good thing...
Click to expand...

It is NOT about ID.

Magats are refusing all sorts of forms of ID, even if States require they meet verification qualifications, if they know those ID's (Tribal, Student, etc) simply because they know they are the easier ones that Dem voters tend to get while they say 'hunting licenses are ok' as they know those tend to be more for magat voters.

So the game, which the left is correct to reject, is to make things harder and harder and more work for Dems to vote while making it easier for Magats as we all know the more you make people, the more a certain percent will just not do it. And in close elections dissuading even a few percent can matter.

If Magats were pushing FAIR rules for all, which allowed Student, Tribal ID's and married women with changed names, etc the same EASY access to ID as a hunter gets, then it would be supported.

Also why do Magats refuse to allow people to be automatically registered to vote once they have obtained an ID? Why require a separate process? Again it is not because they are trying to improve voting and are trying to dissuade people from voting.
 
QP! said:
It is NOT about ID.

Magats are refusing all sorts of forms of ID, even if States require they meet verification qualifications, if they know those ID's (Tribal, Student, etc) simply because they know they are the easier ones that Dem voters tend to get while they say 'hunting licenses are ok' as they know those tend to be more for magat voters.

So the game, which the left is correct to reject, is to make things harder and harder and more work for Dems to vote while making it easier for Magats as we all know the more you make people, the more a certain percent will just not do it. And in close elections dissuading even a few percent can matter.

If Magats were pushing FAIR rules for all, which allowed Student, Tribal ID's and married women with changed names, etc the same EASY access to ID as a hunter gets, then it would be supported.

Also why do Magats refuse to allow people to be automatically registered to vote once they have obtained an ID? Why require a separate process? Again it is not because they are trying to improve voting and are trying to dissuade people from voting.
Click to expand...

When did you cry when "real ID" was required to get on an airline?
 
RB 60 said:
When did you cry when "real ID" was required to get on an airline?
Click to expand...
Again, for magats who are too stupid, i know this will go over your head.

Trumps and Magats are REFUSING to include in 'Real ID' forms of ID that they find are most used by Dem voters even when States say they will ensure they meet the qualifications that Hunters License and the other forms of 'accepted ID' meet.

Why?

Answer : Because this is not about making sure people have 'real ID' or they would allow State Universities to update their Student ID's to those standards and then accept them and THEY REFUSE to allow that.

So the proper question you need to ask RB, if you were not so poorly educated, is 'why the left will not play this game with the magats when it is such a dishonest game'.
 
QP! said:
that is a nonsensical and stupid summarization.


Stupidtiy of assertions refuted :

- Unchecked mail in balloting DOES NOT help Democrats win any more than it helps Magats win. IT IS NEUTRAL TO WHO WINS.
Click to expand...
Magats is not a word, Kewpie.
QP! said:
- An election lasting 7 weeks rather than one day IN NO WAY benefits Dems over Magats. IT IS NEUTRAL TO WHO WINS.
Click to expand...
Magats is not a word, Kewpie.
QP! said:
- Checking on who is voting IN NO WAY benefits Dems over Magats. In most audit and checks, even in Trumps 2016 term checks, recounts, etc, BENEFITED MORE the Dem candidates who tended to rise in totals. But the process is NEUTRAL TO WHO WINS.
Click to expand...
Magats is not a word, Kewpie.
QP! said:
- The issue is not whether it is "Widespread" and is whether it is "Determinative" or approaching ANY THING CLOSE to determinative, and all the DATA and FACTS collected say that answer is NO IT IS NOT. And moreso, when the 'lack of widespread' fraud/errors happens they tends to BENEFIT Magats more, but overall they are NEUTRAL TO WHO WINS.
Click to expand...
Lie.
QP! said:
So as usual Damocles you have fallen for a bunch of magat talking points and think they are meaningful without digging into if there is any substance to them.

You got DUPED, AGAIN.
Click to expand...
Magat is not a word, Kewpie.
 
QP! said:
It is NOT about ID.

Magats are refusing all sorts of forms of ID, even if States require they meet verification qualifications, if they know those ID's (Tribal, Student, etc) simply because they know they are the easier ones that Dem voters tend to get while they say 'hunting licenses are ok' as they know those tend to be more for magat voters.

So the game, which the left is correct to reject, is to make things harder and harder and more work for Dems to vote while making it easier for Magats as we all know the more you make people, the more a certain percent will just not do it. And in close elections dissuading even a few percent can matter.

If Magats were pushing FAIR rules for all, which allowed Student, Tribal ID's and married women with changed names, etc the same EASY access to ID as a hunter gets, then it would be supported.

Also why do Magats refuse to allow people to be automatically registered to vote once they have obtained an ID? Why require a separate process? Again it is not because they are trying to improve voting and are trying to dissuade people from voting.
Click to expand...
Just get the ID..... Why would it be harder for Democrats to vote?
 
QP! said:
The Save Act main goal is to give the Feds the ability to reset voter rolls every 30 days.
Click to expand...
Lie.
QP! said:
Tie that to State Voter Rolls registry the DoJ is corruptly going State to State to collect and you have 95% of the Magat game on stealing the next election.
Click to expand...
Magat is not a word, Kewpie.
QP! said:
You jump all the hoops, register to vote,
Click to expand...
Are you claiming to be too stupid to register to vote, Kewpie?
QP! said:
and do so as the Dem organizers always say you need to do it, which is early, and then the Magats purge your voter roll requiring you to do all again. And over and over they do it. The Feds will not purge Red Voting areas and only Blue voting areas.
Click to expand...
Magats is not a word, Kewpie. There is no such thing as color in a voting area.
QP! said:
A substantial amount, of even the most motivated voters will give up if required to keep doing the same time consuming task over and over.
Click to expand...
What task? Kewpie? You seem to be making shit up.
QP! said:
Add to that smaller things like the US Supreme Court changing the liability laws to say that USPS cannot be held liable now even for 'purposeful and deliberate non delivery of mail', when prior they could be and you can see the Trump controlled USPS just not send out to targeted Blue voting districts any mail that is potential Passport or Birth Certificate, and 'delaying and losing it' in their system until they know it is too late to register.
Click to expand...
Irrelevance fallacy, Kewpie.
 
QP! said:
Again, for magats who are too stupid, i know this will go over your head.
Click to expand...
Magats is not a word, Kewpie.
QP! said:
Trumps and Magats are REFUSING to include in 'Real ID' forms of ID that they find are most used by Dem voters even when States say they will ensure they meet the qualifications that Hunters License and the other forms of 'accepted ID' meet.
Click to expand...
Illiteracy: Use of plural for singular. Meaningless text (Magat). You should probably actually read the bill, Kewpie. You are making shit up.
QP! said:
Why?
Click to expand...
Why are you making shit up? Only YOU would know that, Kewpie.
QP! said:
Answer : Because this is not about making sure people have 'real ID' or they would allow State Universities to update their Student ID's to those standards and then accept them and THEY REFUSE to allow that.
Click to expand...
Irrelevance fallacy. Student ID does not show citizenship.
QP! said:
So the proper question you need to ask RB, if you were not so poorly educated, is 'why the left will not play this game with the magats when it is such a dishonest game'.
Click to expand...
Magats is not a word, Kewpie.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top